| Date |
Text |
| 2015-08-03 07:57:14 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | 1. FBC3501.3.5, PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION TO SHOW THAT THE |
| | FABRIC MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF NFPA701. NO TEST REPORT |
| | OR RESULT WAS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 2. PROVIDE A SITE PLAN SHOWING PROPOSED LOCATION, |
| | HEIGHT AT LOWEST PORTION OF THE AWNING FABRIC, DISTANCE |
| | TO PROPERTY LINE, AND IF IT EXTENDS OVER THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE, INCLUDE THE SIDEWALK WIDTH AND DIMENSION FOR THE |
| | PORTION OF THE AWNING THAT WILL EXTEND OVER THE PUBLIC |
| | WAY, FBC 5TH EDITION BUILDING 3202, CITY OF WEST PALM |
| | BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SECTION |
| | 107. |
| | |
| | 3. FBC 5TH EDITION EXISTING BUILDING SECTION 301.1, |
| | DESIGNER TO STATE WHICH METHOD OF ALTERATION IS ELECTED |
| | FOR THIS PROJECT. |
| | |
| | IT APPEARS THAT THIS IS A LEVEL I ALTERATION, NEW |
| | MATERIALS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR |
| | NEW CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO DETERMINE CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 4. THIS CONTRACTOR WAS UNDER AGREEMENT TO CLOSE OUT 5 |
| | EXPIRED PERMITS PER MONTH. THREE MORE PERMITS HAVE |
| | EXPIRED (TWO WHICH WERE SUPPOSED TO TAKE CARE OF |
| | EXPIRED PERMITS). FAILURE TO CLOSE OUT A SUBSTANTIAL |
| | NUMBER OF PERMITS IMMEDIATELY MAY RESULT IN A COMPLAINT |
| | FILED AGAINST THIS CONTRACTOR. |
| | |
| | MUCH TIME (BOTH BY ME AND BY DIANE FULCHER) WAS SPENT |
| | WITH JOE MATTEI AND DAWN MATTEI EXPLAINING HOW EXPIRED |
| | PERMITS ARE RESOLVED. WHEN RESUBMITTING, CONTRACTOR |
| | SHOULD HAVE A LIST OF EXPIRED PERMITS WHICH HAVE BEEN |
| | CLOSED. THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 26 REVOKED PERMITS, BUT |
| | TWO OF THE REPLACEMENT PERMITS HAVE EXPIRED, WHICH |
| | INDICATES THAT APPROXIMATELY 24 EXPIRED PERMITS HAVE |
| | BEEN RESOLVED. |
| | |
| | CONTRACTOR TODAY HAS A TOTAL OF 77 EXPIRED PERMITS. THE |
| | INITIAL AGREEMENT WHICH WAS, I BELIEVE, IN SEPTEMBER |
| | 2014 WAS FOR 5 PERMITS A MONTH TO BE RESOLVED. RESOLVED |
| | = NEW PERMIT ISSUED, INSPECTED, CLOSED. OBTAINING |
| | PERMITS AND ALLOWING THEM TO EXPIRE IS NOT RESOLUTION |
| | OF AN EXPIRED PERMIT. NEW PERMITS WHICH WERE OPEN |
| | DURING THIS TIME PERIOD (9/14 TO PRESENT) HAVE EXPIRED. |
| | |
| | IN SEPTEMBER 2014, CONTRACTOR APPLIED FOR A TOTAL OF 9 |
| | REISSUE PERMITS; 8 ARE CLOSED, ONE IS AGAIN IN EXPIRED |
| | STATUS. THE EIGHT RESOLVED WILL BE CONSIDERED AS |
| | SEPTEMBER 2014 COMPLIED WITH 5 EXPIRED PERMITS |
| | RESOLVED; OCTOBER 2014 HAD 2 RESOLVED (THE 2 EXTRA FROM |
| | SEPTEMBER, NEW EXPIRED DOESN'T COUNT TOWARDS RESOLVED |
| | PERMITS). CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A LIST OF THE FIVE |
| | PERMITS PER MONTH WHICH WERE RESOLVED. IF NONE OTHER |
| | THAN THE 7 THAT I WAS ABLE TO IMMEDIATELY IDENTIFY WERE |
| | RESOLVED, PLEASE RESOLVE 48 OF THE 76 EXPIRED PERMITS |
| | AT THIS TIME (FIVE PER MONTH, OCTOBER THROUGH JULY). |
| | |
| | COMMENT #4 WILL NOT PREVENT THIS PERMIT FROM BEING |
| | ISSUED. HOWEVER, FAILURE TO RESOLVE 48 EXPIRED PERMITS |
| | (AT A MINIMUM, SUBMIT REISSUE PERMITS) MAY RESULT IN A |
| | COMPLAINT BEING FILED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
