| Date |
Text |
| 2015-10-06 15:32:13 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | PLAN REVIEW IN PROGRESS |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | 1. PROPERTY OWNER SENT PHOTOS WHICH I WAS TO REVIEW |
| | WHEN PLANS WERE RESUBMITTED. DUE TO THE LENGTH OF TIME |
| | SINCE THE PHOTOGRAPHS WERE SENT (TWO MONTHS), I NO |
| | LONGER HAVE THAT EMAIL. |
| | |
| | HOWEVER, BASED ON AERIALS, IT IS CLEAR THAT SOMETIME |
| | AFTER DECEMBER 2010, THE EAST AND SOUTH PARKING AREAS |
| | WERE SEALCOATED AND RESTRIPED, AND NO ACCESSIBLE |
| | PARKING WAS INSTALLED AS REQUIRED. INCORPORATE PARKING |
| | STRIPING INTO THE PLAN. ACCESSIBLE PARKING ON AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2. PLAN SUBMITTED APPEARS REDUCED AND IS DIFFICULT TO |
| | READ. PROVIDE A FULL SIZE PLAN, FBC 107.FOR INSTANCE, |
| | LOOK AT THE TOP RIGHT; TITLE BLOCK, REVISION NUMBERS |
| | ARE NOT LEGIBLE. THE REMAINDER OF THE PAGE IS VERY |
| | SMALL AND DIFFICULT TO READ. |
| | |
| | 3. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT AND SUBMITTED FOR |
| | PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS |
| | FS481. B2STUDIO APPEARS TO BE AN ARCHITECTURAL FIRM. |
| | |
| | 4. RAMPS ARE TO HAVE LANDINGS AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF |
| | THE RAMP RUN, FBC 5TH EDITION ACCESSIBILITY 405.7. |
| | DETAIL 3 SHOWS A LANDING AT THE TOP, DETAIL 2 IS CALLED |
| | A RAMP DETAIL BUT DOES NOT SHOW LANDINGS AND SLOPE |
| | APPEARS MINIMAL. SPEC SLOPE ON PLAN. |
| | |
| | 5. A 1/2" ELEVATION DIFFERENCE IS SHOWN AT WHAT APPEARS |
| | TO BE DOORWAYS (ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES/EXITS). REVISE |
| | PLAN TO SHOW DOORS, DOOR SWING, MANEUVERING CLEARANCE |
| | FBC 5TH EDITION ACCESSIBILITY 305.7. |
| | |
| | 6. "ADA ROUTE" IS SHOWN AS 4', NO WIDTH DIMENSION |
| | PROVIDED FOR WHAT APPEARS TO BE SIDEWALKS LEADING TO |
| | ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES/EXITS. |
| | |
| | 7. AS ADVISED, SEE COMMENT #1, REVISE PLAN TO |
| | INCORPORATE SEALCOATING AND STRIPING INTO THIS PLAN OR |
| | SUBMIT A SEPARATE APPLICATION. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY |
| | RESULT IN A VIOLATION ISSUED WITH 4X PERMIT FINE |
| | ASSESSED. |
| | |
| | SEALCOATING/RESTRIPE IS NOT WITHIN THE SCOPE OF A PAVER |
| | CONTRACTOR LICENSE. A SEPARATE PERMIT BY A CONTRACTOR |
| | LICENSED FOR THIS SCOPE IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 8. AS OWNER WAS UNABLE TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF A |
| | RESTRIPE PERMIT FOR THIS PROPERTY, REVISE PLANS TO |
| | INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: |
| | |
| | REVISE PLAN TO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: |
| | |
| | TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES |
| | NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES |
| | LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES |
| | LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND ACCESS AISLES |
| | SHOW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM PUBLIC WAY |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM ACCESSIBLE SPACE TO ACCESSIBLE |
| | ENTRANCE |
| | |
| | SEE FBC 2010 ACCESSIBLITY 202.3 (ALTERATIONS), 208.2 |
| | (PARKING SPACES), 502 (PARKING SPACES), 206 (ACCESSIBLE |
| | ROUTE). |
| | |
| | YOU MAY FIND THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT USEFUL, |
| | PARTICULARLY THE INTRODUCTION: "WHEN A BUSINESS |
| | RESTRIPES A PARKING LOT, IT MUST PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE |
| | PARKING SPACES AS REQUIRED BY THE ADA STANDARDS FOR |
| | ACCESSIBLE DESIGN." |
| | |
| | HTTP://WWW.ADA.GOV/RESTRIPE.HTM |
| | |
| | 9. FBC 2010 ACCESSIBILITY 208.2.1, THE FOLLOWING USES |
| | HAVE ADDITIONAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS: |
| | |
| | HOSPITAL OUTPATIENT FACILITES |
| | REHABILITATION FACILITIES |
| | OUTPATIENT PHYSICAL THERAPY FACILITIES |
| | |
| | PLAN IS TO EITHER SHOW LOCATION OF TENANTS WITH ANY OF |
| | THE ABOVE USES OR PLAN IS TO INCLUDE A STATEMENT WHICH |
| | STATES THAT NONE OF THE ABOVE USES (HOSPITAL OUTPATIENT |
| | FACILITIES, REHABILITATION FACILITIES, OUTPATIENT |
| | PHYSICAL THERAPY FACILITIES) ARE AT THIS LOCATION. |
| | |
| | |
