| Date |
Text |
| 2015-07-15 19:51:37 | PLEASE NOTE THAT I, MIKE ALBARRAN, ELECTRICAL PLANS |
| | EXAMINER HAVE COMPLETED THE REVIEW OF THE ABOVE |
| | MENTIONED JOB. BELOW ARE THE COMMENTS WITH REGARDS TO |
| | THE REQUIRED CORRECTIONS. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL BE |
| | CORRECTED AND THE PLANS RESUBMITTED FOR ANOTHER REVIEW. |
| | 1. YOU HAVE SUBMITTED A GENERIC DRAWING WITH MULTIPLE |
| | SYSTEMS. YOU SHALL INDICATE WHICH OF THESE SYSTEMS YOU |
| | WILL BE INSTALLING. IF YOUR INSTALLATION DIFFERS FROM |
| | THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS, A SITE SPECIFIC DRAWING SHALL |
| | BE PROVIDED. |
| | 2. YOU SHALL PROVIDE A SITE SPECIFIC RISER DIAGRAM |
| | SHOWING LOCATION OF INTERCONNECTION OF THE PV SYSTEM |
| | AND VARIOUS COMPONENTS. THIS RISER SHALL INCLUDE ALL |
| | REQUIRED SIGNAGE. |
| | 3. THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS APPEAR TO INCLUDE A BACK-FED |
| | BREAKER WITHOUT ANY REFERENCES TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | NEC 690.9(E). |
| | 4. THE SUBMITTED SPECS FOR THE INVERTER FAIL TO |
| | INDICATE A LISTING OR RATING FOR AN INTER-ACTIVE SYSTEM |
| | AS REQUIRED IN NEC 690.60. |
| | 5. FAILURE WITH NOTE 4 ABOVE VOIDS COMPLIANCE WITH NEC |
| | 690.61. |
| | 6. ROMEX, AS MENTIONED IN YOUR NOTES IS A BRAND NAME |
| | AND NOT A TYPE OF LISTED CABLE; FURTHERMORE NEC |
| | 334.12(B)(4) PROHIBITS THE USE OF NM, NMC ETC. IN WET |
| | LOCATIONS. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. |
| | |
| | THANK YOU |
| | |
