| Plan Review Notes For Permit 15061269 |
| Permit Number |
15061269 |
|
| Review Stop |
E |
| Sequence Number |
3 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2015-10-14 17:51:04 | AT A MEETING THIS AFTERNOON WITH REPRESENTATIVES FROM | | | KAST, THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, THE ARCHITECT THE | | | OWNER AND MYSELF WE DISCUSSED THE REQUIRED CORRECTIONS | | | AS INDICATED BY MY REVIEW NOTES. I WAS FALSELY LED TO | | | BELIEVE THAT THERE HAD BEEN A RE-SUBMITTAL ADDRESSING | | | ALL THE CORRECTIONS ACCOMPANIED BY A NARRATIVE WHICH | | | WESLEY JOLIN APPROVED. AFTER OUR MEETING I TRIED TO GO | | | INTO PROJECTDOX TO STRAIGHTEN OUT THE SUPPOSEDLY | | | INCORRECT VERSIONING AND REALIZED THAT IT WAS ALL | | | FALSE, THERE HAS NOT BEEN A RE-SUBMITTAL AND WES HAS | | | NOT SEEN A REVISED SET OF DRAWINGS. AS HE STATED IN | | | COMMUNITY PLUS, HE APPROVED BASED ONLY ON THE | | | ENGINEER'S LETTER. THESE FOLKS HAVE BEEN REMINDED | | | NUMEROUS TIMES TO GET THEIR CORRECTED SUBMITTAL IN FOR | | | REVIEW AND THEY HAVE NOT DONE SO. IRRESPONSIBILITY ON | | | THEIR PART DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN EMERGENCY ON MINE. | | | ON THE OTHER HAND, THIS STRUCTURE BEING GREATER THAN | | | 75' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE CONSIDERED PER FBC-BUILDING A | | | HIGH-RISE AND THEREFORE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FIRE | | | ALARM REQUIREMENTS AS INDICATED IN THE 5TH EDITION OF | | | THE FBC-B 2014 SECTION 907.2.13 |
|
