Date |
Text |
2015-09-10 19:10:58 | PLAN |
| REVIEW COMMENTS |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| (561) 805-6714 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| DENIED BY BUILDING |
| PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| |
| 1) THE ENERGY FORM DOES NOT SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC |
| ENERGY CONSERVATION SECTION 402. THE U-FACTOR SPECIFIED |
| IS MORE THAN THE MAXIMUM OF .65. THE PERCENTAGE OF |
| GLASS TO FLOOR AREA IS NOT 20 PERCENT. THE RAISED FLOOR |
| AREA IS SPECIFIED AS 56 SQFT AND THE ENCLOSED AREA IS |
| 177 SQFT. THE AHU LOCATION IS NOT LISTED ON THE FORM. |
| THE FORM IS NOT SIGNED BY THE OWNER/AGENT. YOU WILL |
| NEED TO SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION FOR THE WINDOWS THAT WILL |
| BE INSTALLED TO SHOW THEIR U-FACTOR AND SHGC. |
| |
| 2) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE NEW |
| WINDOWS THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING |
| BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. FBC107.3.4.1 |
| |
| 3) SHOW THAT THE WINDOWS WILL COMPLY WITH R301.2.1.2 |
| PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. WINDOWS IN BUILDINGS LOCATED IN |
| WINDBORNE DEBRIS REGIONS SHALL HAVE GLAZED OPENINGS |
| PROTECTED FROM WINDBORNE DEBRIS. GLAZED OPENING |
| PROTECTION FOR WINDBORNE DEBRIS SHALL MEET THE |
| REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST OF ASTM E 1996, |
| ASTM E 1886, SSTD 12 OR TAS 201,202 AND 203 OR AAMA 506 |
| REFERENCED THEREIN. ( IF USING STORM PANELS, SUBMIT |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS AND AN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. ) |
| |
| 4) THE VALUE OF $10,000.00 ON THE APPLICATION FOR THE |
| SCOPE OF WORK SHOWN ON THE PLANS APPEARS TO |
| UNDERVALUED. SUBMIT A COPY OF THE SIGNED CONTRACT. FBC |
| 109.3 BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. FOR PERMITTING |
| PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE |
| TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, |
| ELECTRIC, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH, |
| RELATIVE SITE WORK, ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, |
| MARKETING COSTS, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY |
| LAND VALUE. VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST |
| PUBLISHED DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS |
| SERVICES (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.), AS PUBLISHED BY |
| INTERNATIONAL CODE CONGRESS. FINAL BUILDING PERMIT |
| VALUATION SHALL BE SET BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. SUBMIT |
| A COPY OF THE SIGNED CONTRACT TO VERIFY THE VALUATION |
| OF THE PROJECT. |
| |
| 5) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIMES AND PROVIDE |
| CLARIFICATION, PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER |
| INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN |
| ADDRESSED. |
| |
| |