| Date |
Text |
| 2015-06-27 16:59:53 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | 1- BRING PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) |
| | FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED |
| | PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT. COUNTY IMPACT FEE |
| | ORDINANCE OF THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. |
| | |
| | 2- NEED TO SPECIFY CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS. SEC R315 OF |
| | 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 3- SHEET A901: REVISE THE SLIDING GLASS DOORS AND |
| | WINDOWS HEAD AND JAMB NOTES. BEVELED BUCKS ARE NOT |
| | ALLOWED. SEC. R612.10.2 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 4- SHEET S2: |
| | A) DETAIL 1/S2 IS MISSING THE ROOF SHEATHING NAIL TYPE, |
| | SIZE AND SPACING. SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #5 BELOW. |
| | |
| | B) SPECIFY THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE |
| | R301.5 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 5- DETAIL 12/S3: SEC R803.2.3.1 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL |
| | REQUIRES 8D RING SHANK NAILS MIN. PLYWOOD BLOCKING |
| | DETAIL CALLS FOR 10D NAILS. REVISE AS REQUIRED OR |
| | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING THAT 10D NAILS ARE EQUAL |
| | OR BETTER THAN 8D RING SHANK NAILS. SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM # 4(A) ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN. SEC R401.3 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 7- SOIL TEST REPORT IS INCOMPLETE. PROVIDE SOIL TEST |
| | REPORT WITH ALL THE INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 1803.6 FBC-2010. |
| | |
| | 8- REVISE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. SEC 103.2.1.1.2 OF |
| | 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION: |
| | A) PROVIDE CORRECT BUILDER'S NAME, CORRECT PERMIT |
| | OFFICE AND CORRECT JURISDICTION NUMBER ON TOP OF FORM. |
| | |
| | B) IDENTIFY WHERE ARE THE INSULATED DOORS SHOWN ON PAGE |
| | 4 OF 6. IT DOESN'T MATCH PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | C) REVISE THE BUILDING ORIENTATION TO MATCH PLANS. AND, |
| | REVISE THE WALLS AND WINDOWS ORIENTATION ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | D) REVISE THE OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION OF EACH |
| | WINDOW/DOOR TO MATCH PLANS. |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: WINDOWS AND DOORS LABELS WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON ITEM |
| | #7. |
| | |
| | 9- PROVIDE STRUCTURAL FRAMING DETAIL FOR OVAL WINDOWS |
| | AS SHOWN ON PLANS. SEC. R301.1 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 10- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) MAHOGANY ENTRY DOOR SIZE ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | B) ROOF TILE. |
| | |
| | C) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE. SEE ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | FOR LISTED ADHESIVE. |
| | |
| | D) PEEL & STICK CONCRETE ROOF TILE UNDERLAYMENT AS |
| | SPECIFIED ON DETAIL D1 OF SHEET A801. |
| | |
| | E) PRECAST LINTELS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | 11- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE ALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS IN WRITING (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) |
| | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 12- CLARIFY WHY THERE IS ANOTHER ENGINEER (NOT THE |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD) SUBMITTING A "WINDOW & DOOR |
| | INSTALLATION?. ALSO, THE DESIGN PRESSURES ARE DIFFERENT |
| | THAN THOSE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. WHICH |
| | ONE IS THE ONE WITH THE CORRECT DESIGN PRESSURES? AND, |
| | THE SLIDING GLASS DOORS MULLIONS ARE NOT CLEAR |
| | (HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL?). SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 13- CLEARLY IDENTIFY MULLION SIZE FOR OPENINGS #108, |
| | #109 AND #110 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES OF SEC. R301 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. CLEARLY |
| | IDENTIFY THE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL MULLIONS. |
| | |
| | 14- SLIDING GLASS DOORS NOA 14-0128.11. PAGE 6 OF 22 |
| | WAS HIGHLIGHTED WITH TABLE 1A WITH LOWER SILL HEIGHT. |
| | DOORS WITH LOW SILL HEIGHT DON'T MEET THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES FOR OPENING #110. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 15- TRUSS PACKAGE: |
| | A) TRUSS PACKAGE DOESN'T COMPLY WITH SEC. 61G15-31.003. |
| | THE COVER PAGE IS MISSING THE ENGINEER OF RECORD |
| | INFORMATION AND EACH INDIVIDUAL TRUSS DRAWING NEEDS THE |
| | TRUSS ENGINEER'S INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | B) ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE TRUSS |
| | PACKAGE BEFORE SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | NOTE: TRUSS PACKAGE DOESN'T NEED TO BE RE-SUBMITTED TO |
| | THIS OFFICE NOW. ON RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS, THE |
| | CONTRACTOR MAY DELIVER THE REVISED TRUSS PACKAGE TO THE |
| | INSPECTOR AT TIME OF FRAMING INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | 16- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS |
| | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO $568,741. THE |
| | PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $8938.19. |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ***PLEASE REPLACE AND REMOVE ANY REVISED DRAWING. |
| | SUBMITT OLD COPY FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
