Date |
Text |
2015-04-15 08:48:38 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| 561-805-6724 |
| |
| FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE, A SUMMARY OF THE DOCUMENTS |
| SUBMITTED ARE AT THE END OF THIS PLAN REVIEW. |
| |
| 1. DUE TO THE NUMBER OF PERMITS, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT |
| A "MASTER" BE GENERATED. THE PERMIT DOCUMENTS WOULD BE |
| STORED UNDER THE MASTER, PERMIT CARDS WOULD REFERENCE |
| THE MASTER, AND CONTRACTOR WOULD PROVIDE A FEW SETS OF |
| DOCUMENTS - ONE FOR THIS DEPARTMENT TO RETAIN, AND A |
| FEW SETS FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES (THE NUMBER WOULD |
| DEPEND ON THE NUMBER OF BUILDINGS FOR WHICH INSPECTIONS |
| WOULD BE CALLED IN ON ONE DAY AS IT IS A REQUIREMENT TO |
| HAVE THE PLANS PROVIDED ON THE JOBSITE AT TIME OF |
| INSPECTION). A MINIMUM OF THREE INSPECTION SETS ARE |
| RECOMMENDED. |
| |
| IF CONTRACTOR ELECTS NOT TO USE A MASTER, EACH PERMIT |
| PACKAGE IS TO BE REVISED TO ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS. THE |
| NOA WAS SUBMITTED WITH SHEET 2 ON THE TOP OF THE |
| PACKAGE. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PUT NOA PAGES IN |
| ORDER. THIS HAS BEEN DONE FOR YOU FOR APPROXIMATELY |
| HALF OF THE APPLICATIONS. |
| |
| 2. PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE EXISTING ROOF. THE |
| PERMIT DOCUMENTS SHOULD INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION |
| REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE, FBC 107. |
| |
| BASED ON TWO RECORDS, (PERMIT #01041400 FOR ADDRESSES |
| 7113,7114 71ST WAY AND 7223 7224 72ND WAY, ALSO SEE |
| 01041405, 01041403), IT APPEARS THAT THE EXISTING ROOF |
| SYSTEM IS TPO, INSULATED DECK (NOA 98-0305.02, JPS |
| ELASTOMERIC CORPORATION, STEVENS ROOFING SYSTEMS, |
| SINGLE PLY ROOFING SYSTEM OVER CONCRETE DECK, NOA |
| SUB-TYPE TPO). DESCRIPTIONS OF ADDRESSES INCLUDED IN |
| THESE THREE PERMITS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET. I |
| HAVE VERIFIED THAT BOTH 01041400 AND 01041405 WERE |
| ISSUED WITH THE TPO ROOF NOA REFERENCED. EXISTING ROOF |
| TYPE SHOULD BE FIELD VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR. |
| |
| 3. SEE PAGE 3, PVC SINGLE PLY ROOF SYSTSMS IS |
| UNDERLINED. BASED ON OUR PERMIT RECORDS FOR THIS |
| PROJECT, THE ROOF IS TPO. TPO IS NOT ONE OF THE SYSTEMS |
| INCLUDED IN THE MIAMI DADE NOA. PLEASE ADDRESS BY |
| PROVIDING INFORMATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER WHICH |
| DOCUMENTS THE SUITABILITY OF THIS APPLICATION. |
| |
| 4. PROVIDE SPEC SHEETS FOR THE GACOWASH. THIS SHOULD |
| PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE PRODUCT AS WELL AS |
| RECOMMENDED DILUTION RATE, FBC 107. |
| |
| 5. E5320 IS SPECIFIED AS A "PRIMER COAT" IN THE |
| PROPOSAL. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER SPEC SHEETS/INSTALLATION |
| INSTRUCTIONS, FBC 107. APPLICATION PROPOSES "PRIMER" AT |
| A RATE OF 1 GALLON / 250 SF. SINCE THIS PRODUCT DOES |
| NOT APPEAR TO HAVE A PRODUCT APPROVAL (IT IS ONLY |
| REFERENCED IN THE ROOF COATING SYSTEMS IN THE NOA), |
| PROVIDE MANUFACTURER SPEC SHEETS WHICH INCLUDE |
| INFORMATION ABOUT THE PRODUCT AND THE RECOMMENDED |
| APPLICATION METHOD AND RATE. ALTHOUGH IT DOES NOT HAVE |
| A PRODUCT APPROVAL, IT APPEARS THAT THIS IS THE PRODUCT |
| WHICH ASSURES THE BOND REQUIRED FOR WIND RESISTANCE FBC |
| 1609. |
| |
| 6. APPLICATION AND PROPOSAL SPECIFY GACO FLEX S2000, |
| 1.5 GALLONS PER 100 SF. SEE PAGE 3 OF THE NOA; TWO |
| COATS AT A MINIMUM RATE OF .75 GAL / 100' EACH ARE |
| REQUIRED. ALTHOUGH THE TOTAL GALLONS PER SF IS |
| CONSISTENT WITH THE NOA, THE APPLICATION METHOD |
| PROPOSED ("A TOP COAT") DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE |
| REQUIREMENTS OF THE NOA. |
| |
| 7. ONLY ONE PAGE OF A THREE PAGE CONTRACT WAS PROPOSED. |
| PROVIDE THE COMPLETE CONTRACT, FBC 109. |
| |
| 8. IF METHOD OF INSTALLATION AS PROPOSED ON THE |
| APPLICATION IS NOT APPROVED, NEW APPLICATIONS WILL BE |
| REQUIRED. IT IS RECOMMENDED TO HAVE ONLY INFORMATION |
| DESCRIBING THE PROJECT ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION (WHICH |
| SHOULD INCLUDE ROOF AREA, TYPE OF ROOF PROPOSED, MEAN |
| ROOF HEIGHT, DECK TYPE), AND HAVE SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| INSTALLATION IN THE PERMIT DOCUMENTS. IT IS NOT TYPICAL |
| TO SPEC INSTALLATION IN THE PERMIT DESCRIPTION. AS THE |
| PERMIT DESCRIPTION ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION DOES NOT |
| APPEAR TO BE CODE COMPLIANT, A NEW PERMIT APPLICATION |
| WILL BE REQUIRED UNLESS IT IS DETERMINED THAT THE |
| INSTALLATION METHOD PROPOSED ON THE APPLICATION IS |
| ACCEPTABLE AND A PERMIT IS ISSUED WITH THIS SPEC. |
| |
| 9. PERMIT 02090676 FOR 7404 74TH WAY IS EXPIRED (DID |
| NOT OBTAIN A FINAL INSPECTION). IF THIS PROJECT |
| INCLUDES THIS ADDRESS, THIS PERMIT IS TO BE RESOLVED |
| PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT FOR THAT BUILDING. |
| |
| TO RESOLVE THE EXPIRED PERMIT: |
| |
| APPLICATION WITH THE DESCRIPTION: "FINAL INSPECTION |
| ONLY TO CLOSE EXPIRED PERMIT #02090676" TO BE SUBMITTED |
| AT THE BUILDING DIVISION USING THE STANDARD COUNTY WIDE |
| BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. A RECORDS RESEARCH REQUEST |
| SHOULD BE SUBMITTED AT THE SAME TIME TO OBTAIN A COPY |
| OF THAT PERMIT. IF AVAILABLE, IT WILL BE SUPPLIED FOR |
| YOU. |
| |
| AFTER ISSUANCE, A FINAL INSPECTION SHOULD BE SCHEDULED. |
| |
| ******************************************************* |
| ************ |
| INFORMATION REGARDING DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED WITH |
| APPLICATION: |
| |
| NOA 12-0426.06 WAS SUBMITTED. |
| |
| APPLICATION PROPOSED INSTALLATION STATES: "APPLY PRIMER |
| AT RATE OF 1 GALLON PER 250 SQ FT APPLY G4CO FLEX S-200 |
| AT RATE OF 1.5 GALLONS PER 100 SQ FT." |
| |
| SYSTEM "S-2000" IS UNDERLINED ON PAGE 3 OF THE NOA. |
| |
| PAGE 2 OF THE NOA HAS BEEN PULLED OUT OF ORDER AND PUT |
| ON THE TOP OF EACH PACKAGE. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY THIS |
| WAS DONE; IT APPEARS THAT THE SYSTEM SELECTED IS ON |
| PAGE 3. NOA SHOULD BE PUT IN ORDER. |
| |
| THE CONTRACT PROVIDED PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING, WHICH IS |
| CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICATION: |
| |
| PRIMER COAST OF GACOFLEX E-5320 PRIMER AT A RATE OF 1 |
| GALLON PER 250 SF |
| TOP COAT OF GACOFLEX S-2000 COATING AT A RATE OF 1.5 |
| GALLONS PER 100 SF |
| ******************************************************* |
| ************ |