| Date |
Text |
| 2015-05-20 11:23:06 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRESSURES ON S.01 ARE FOR |
| | A TWO STORY STRUCTURE WITH A 23'-0" MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. |
| | THIS PROJECT IS FOR A ONE STORY STRUCTURE WITH A 14'-5" |
| | MEAN ROOF HEIGHT PER THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS. FBC-R |
| | 301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 2) THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT IS 15'-4" ON THE NORTH |
| | ELEVATION ON SHEET A.05 AND IT IS 14'-5" ON THE OTHER |
| | ELEVATIONS. CLARIFY. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 3) PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR THE 5' MASONRY WALL |
| | AND GATES AT THE REAR OF THE STRUCTURE. FBC-R 301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 4) SPECIFY THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | FOR THE 10 : 12 SLOPED AND 1/2" : 12 FLAT ROOF AREAS ON |
| | THE PLANS. FBC-R 301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 5) IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF WINDOW ( SINGLE HUNG, FIXED, |
| | HORIZONTAL SLIDING, ETC. ) FOR EACH OPENING ON THE |
| | PLANS. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 6) SPECIFY THE SIZES OF THE DOOR SIDELITES AND OF EACH |
| | WINDOW WHEN MULTIPLES ARE INSTALLED IN ONE OPENING AS |
| | IN THE FAMILY ROOM. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 7) FBC-R 403.1.4, AS WELL AS, THE SOIL REPORT REQUIRES |
| | THE BOTTOM OF FOOTINGS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 12" BELOW |
| | FINAL GRADE. DETAIL 1 ON S.03 FOR THE 18" DEEP FOOTING |
| | WILL NEED TO BE REVISED SO THAT THE 6" ABOVE GRADE IS |
| | TO THE FINISHED FLOOR RATHER THAN THE 1-1/2" BLOCK |
| | RECESS. |
| | |
| | 8) SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | OUTDOOR GRILL AND HOOD WHICH INDICATES THAT IT IS |
| | LISTED FOR USE ON A COVERED PORCH WITH ONLY ONE SIDE |
| | OPEN TO THE EXTERIOR. FBC-R G2406.1 |
| | |
| | 9) SUBMIT THE CURRENT EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE SPRAY |
| | FOAM INSULATION THAT WILL BE USED. FBC-R 316 |
| | |
| | 10) SOME OF THE WINDOWS APPEAR TO BE SINGLE HUNG |
| | WINDOWS AND THERE WAS NOT A PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED |
| | FOR THEM. A PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED FOR |
| | HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS (NOA NO.11-1031.04), BUT |
| | THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ANY OF THESE. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY. DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | |
| | 11) SPECIFY THE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT FROM THOSE LISTED |
| | IN NOA NO. 13-0723.05 THAT WILL BE USED TO INSTALL THE |
| | CONCRETE ROOF TILE AND PROVIDE ADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO |
| | THE OVERTURN MOMENT. FBC-R 301.2.1 ( NOTE: IF AN |
| | ADHESIVE WILL BE USED, SUBMIT IT'S PRODUCT APPROVALS.) |
| | |
| | 12) SPECIFY THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY AND MAXIMUM DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE FROM NOA NO. 11-0119.09 ( FIRESTONE MODIFIED |
| | BITUMEN ROOF SYSTEM) THAT WILL BE INSTALLED. SUBMIT |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR ENHANCED |
| | FASTENING. FBC-R 301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 13) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIMES AND PROVIDE |
| | CLARIFICATION, PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
