Date |
Text |
2016-02-18 13:58:29 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| 561-805-6724 |
| |
| THE PEDDS SUBMITTED TO DATE DO NOT START WITH THE |
| EARLIEST VERSION OF THE PLANS SUBMITTED. PEDDS HAVE |
| BEEN SUBMITTED THREE TIMES, AND AT QUICK GLANCE IT |
| APPEARS THAT EACH PEDDS SUBMITTAL HAS BEEN FOR THE |
| SHEETS IN EACH RESUBMITTAL. PEDDS FOR REVIEW CYCLES 1 |
| AND 2 HAVE NOT BEEN SUBMITTED. FOR AN EXAMPLE, PLEASE |
| SEE THE SCREEN SHOT (SENT VIA EMAIL TO |
| [email protected]) OF THE CIVIL DRAWINGS (C01 THROUGH |
| C12, VARIOUS SUBMITTAL DATES) AND THE PEDDS SUBMITTED |
| FOR THE CIVIL DRAWINGS (SHEETS C5, 6, 9 AND 12 ONLY). |
| THE ARCHITECTURAL PEDDS ARE ALSO INCOMPLETE. I HAVE |
| CONFIRMED THAT OUR OFFICE HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY PEDDS |
| PRIOR TO 12/9/2015. |
| |
| IN THE PROJECTDOX "SIGNATURE" FOLDER, DOCUMENTS WHICH |
| APPEAR TO BE RELATED TO PEDDS WERE UPLOADED ON |
| 4/7/2015. PEDDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE ORIGINAL SIGNED, |
| SEALED, DATED DOCUMENTS AND ARE TO BE COMPLETE. THE |
| DOCUMENTS UPLOADED ARE INCOMPLETE AS THEY DO NOT |
| INCLUDE THE PAGE NAMES SEALED. FOR AN EXAMPLE OF THIS, |
| PLEASE SEE THE SCREEN SHOTS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS |
| EMAIL. |
| |
| PLEASE PROVIDE THE MISSING PEDDS (OR OTHER SIGNATURE |
| DOCUMENTS) TO THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR REVIEW. IF YOU |
| NEED ASSISTANCE, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME AT YOUR |
| CONVENIENCE. |
| |
| 2/18/16 PEDDS SUBMITTALS DATED 1/25/16, 12/9/15, |
| 2/16/16 ROUTED TO PEDDS BOX |
| |
2016-02-17 13:45:58 | 2/17/16 PEDDS GIVEN TO SHILL |
2016-01-25 16:37:54 | 1.25.16 NEW PEDDS RECEIVED, WAITING ON PLAN REVIEW TO |
| BE COMPLETED. LEM |
2015-12-09 11:15:25 | PEDDS SUBMITTED 12/9/15 WAITING ON FULL PASSED PLAN |
| REVIEW TO GIVE TO SKENNEDY, IN THE PEDDS BOX AT THE |
| MOMENT |