| Date |
Text |
| 2015-03-25 15:27:31 | PROVISO |
| | REVISION REQUIRED PRIOR TO FIRST INSPECTION |
| | ISSUED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK |
| | |
| | 1. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR |
| | PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS |
| | FS471 (CALCS PREPARED BY DENNIS PATRICK, PE). ONE SHEET |
| | IS A PHOTOCOPY (POLE DRAWING, SEE COMMENT #2). ONE SET |
| | OF CALCS IS NOT SIGNED AND DATED. |
| | |
| | 2. THE SHEET LABELED "ALEXANDER LOFTS WEST PALM BEACH, |
| | FL VEF04.8SPL POLE WITH TENON ASSEMBLY" LACKS A TITLE |
| | BLOCK FOR THE ENGINEER, SEE FS471 AND |
| | FAC61G15-23.002(3)(A) AND IS REQUIRED TO BE A SIGNED, |
| | SEALED, DATED ORIGINAL. |
| | |
| | 3. THE INDEX SHEET SHOULD, ACCORDING TO |
| | FAC61G15-23.002(B), INCLUDE "SUFFICIENT INFORMATION ON |
| | INDEX SHEET SO THAT THE USER WILL BE AWARE OF EACH |
| | PORTION OF THE SPECIFICATIONS OR CALCULATIONS FOR WHICH |
| | EACH PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE." INDEX SHEET |
| | HAS "SHEETS 1 -9" AS METHOD OF IDENTIFYING THE SHEETS |
| | WITH NO DESCRIPTION. |
| | |
| | FIRST PAGE IS LABELED "SHEET 1A OF 9." THE NEXT SHEETS |
| | ARE LABELED "PAGE 1 OF 8," "PAGE 2 OF 8," ETC. THE LAST |
| | PAGE IS MARKED "SHEET 9/9." IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE |
| | PAGES BE MARKED "1 OF 9," "2 OF 9," ETC. THIS CAN BE |
| | WRITTEN/ADDED ON TO EACH SHEET IN ADDITION TO OTHER |
| | PAGE NUMBERS WHICH MAY BE ON THE PAGE AS LONG AS |
| | INTENTION IS CLEAR. |
| | |
| | IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE INDEX SHEET BE REVISED TO |
| | INCLUDE AN IDENTIFICATION OF THE DOCUMENTS. FOR |
| | INSTANCE: |
| | |
| | SHEET 1/9: AMERON CATALOG #VEF04.8SPL 15', LIGHT POLE |
| | SPECIFICATION |
| | SHEETS 2/9 THROUGH 8/9: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS FOR ROUND |
| | FLUTED PRESTRESSED CONCRETE ELECTROLIER, DATED |
| | 11/11/2014 |
| | |
| | ETC. |
| | |
| | THE COMMENT REGARDING INDEX SHEET HAS BEEN MADE IN THE |
| | PAST FOR THIS ENGINEER. ALTHOUGH I HAVE NEVER SPOKEN |
| | WITH THE ENGINEER, I WAS TOLD THAT HE DIDN'T UNDERSTAND |
| | THE COMMENT. IF THE COMMENT IS STILL NOT CLEAR, PLEASE |
| | CALL ME TO DISCUSS. ANOTHER FORMAT CAN BE USED PROVIDED |
| | THAT THERE IS "SUFFICIENT INFORMATION ON INDEX SHEET SO |
| | THAT THE USER WILL BE AWARE OF EACH PORTION OF THE |
| | SPECIFICATIONS OR CALCULATIONS FOR WHICH EACH |
| | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE." |
| | |
| | 4. THE STATEMENT THAT "AASHTO 150MPH WIND ZONE |
| | CORRESPONDS TO 2010 FBC 193 MPH WIND ZONE OF THE FBC |
| | 2010" NEEDS FURTHER CLARIFICATION. |
| | |
| | FBC 2010 USES ASCE7-10 WHICH DOES NOT ALLOW A .77 |
| | FACTOR ; THIS REDUCTION (USED IN AASHTO/ASCE7-05) IS |
| | BUILT INTO THE WIND SPEED MAP. PLEASE REVISE THE |
| | ULTIMATE (FBC 2010) WIND SPEED TO CORRELATE WITH 150MPH |
| | WITH .77 REDUCTION. IT APPEARS THAT CALCS COMPLY EVEN |
| | AFTER THIS IS CORRECTED. IF ENGINEER DISAGREES, PLEASE |
| | HAVE HIM CALL OR EMAIL TO EXPLAIN. |
| | |
| | 5. DELEGATED ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED BY ENGINEER |
| | OF RECORD, FAC61G15-23. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
