Date |
Text |
2015-05-26 10:17:31 | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| (561) 805-6714 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| DENIED BY BUILDING - ( NOTE: THE PERMIT APPLICATION AND |
| OLD PLANS ARE MISSING FROM THIS RESUBMITTAL. ) |
| |
| PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| |
| 1) NEW COMMENT. BASED ON YOUR RESPOSE TO THE PREVIOUS |
| COMMENT, YOU INTEND TO BRING THE ILLEGALLY ENCLOSED |
| PORCHES INTO CODE COMPLIANCE. SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF |
| ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THAT THE ENCLOSED PORCHES |
| COMPLY WITH THE 2010 FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION AND SEE |
| THE IMPACT FEE REVIEW STOP. |
| |
| 2) REPEAT COMMENT. THE VALUE OF $7500.00 SPECIFIED ON |
| THE APPLICATION IS LOW FOR THE WORK SHOWN ON THE PLANS. |
| FBC 109.3 BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. FOR PERMITTING |
| PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE |
| TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, |
| ELECTRIC, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH, |
| RELATIVE SITE WORK, ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, |
| MARKETING COSTS, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY |
| LAND VALUE. VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST |
| PUBLISHED DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS |
| SERVICES (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.), AS PUBLISHED BY |
| INTERNATIONAL CODE CONGRESS. FINAL BUILDING PERMIT |
| VALUATION SHALL BE SET BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| |
| 3) REPEAT COMMENT. THE PLANS SPECIFY NEW IMPACT DOORS |
| AND WINDOWS. FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA |
| RULE 9N-3 THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN |
| WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH FL OR NOA NUMBERS INCLUDING |
| INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES |
| FOR EACH OF THE DIFFERENT ROOFING MATERIALS, |
| WINDOW/GLASS TYPES, STRUCTURAL MULLIONS AND EXTERIOR |
| DOOR TYPES. |
| NEW COMMENT. THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED |
| ARE FOR NON-IMPACT RATED WINDOWS AND GLAZED EXTERIOR |
| DOORS. IF YOU WILL BE INSTALLING NON-IMPACT WINDOWS AND |
| DOORS, REVISE THE PLAN NOTES AND SUBMIT PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS FOR THE REQUIRED IMPACT PROTECTION |
| |
| 4) REPEAT COMMENT. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R311.7.7 |
| AND R312 FOR GUARDS AND HANDRAILS ON THE DECK STAIRS. |
| NEW COMMENT.THE PLAN SPECIFIES THAT THE STAIRS HAVE 6 |
| RISERS. FBC-R311.7.7 REQUIRES HANDRAILS NOT LESS THAN |
| 34 INCHES OR MORE THAN 38 INCHES ON AT LEAST ONE SIDE |
| OF A FLIGHT OF STAIRS WITH FOUR OR MORE RISERS. |
| |
| 5) REPEAT COMMENT. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-R314.3.1 |
| WHEN ALTERATIONS, REPAIRS OR ADDITIONS REQUIRING A |
| PERMIT OCCUR, OR WHEN ONE OR MORE SLEEPING ROOMS ARE |
| ADDED OR CREATED IN EXISTING DWELLINGS, THE INDIVIDUAL |
| DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH SMOKE ALARMS |
| LOCATED AS REQUIRED FOR NEW DWELLINGS. |
| NEW COMMENT. IN ADDITION TO THE SMOKE ALARMS REQUIRED |
| IN EACH SLEEPING ROOM, THEY ARE REQUIRED OUTSIDE EACH |
| SLEEPING AREA IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE |
| BEDROOMS. |
| |
| 6) NEW COMMENT. THE TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL SECTION ON |
| SHEET 5 SPECIFIES 6" BATT INSULATION WITH AN R-30 MIN. |
| INSULATION VALUE. THERE ARE NOT ANY 6 INCH THICK BATT |
| INSULATIONS THAT CAN PROVIDE A R-30 THERMAL RESISTANCE. |
| DEPENDING ON THE INSULATING MATERIAL USED, THE |
| THICKNESS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE R-30 VARIES. YOU CAN |
| REVISE NOTE TO SAY MINIMUM R-30 BATT INSULATION. FBC |
| 107.2.1 |
| |
| 7) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIMES AND PROVIDE |
| CLARIFICATION, PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER |
| INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN |
| ADDRESSED. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |