Date |
Text |
2017-02-14 13:12:40 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| REVISED 2/14 TO ADD CODE SECTION FBC A 206.4 |
| REVISED 2/27 TO ADD INFORMATION FROM EMAIL SENT 2/16/17 |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| 561-805-6724 |
| |
| FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| |
| 3. FBC A 201.1.1, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO SECOND FLOOR IS |
| NOT CLEAR. THE ROUTE SHOWN INCLUDES STAIRS IN THE |
| EXISTING BUILDING. STAIRS ARE NOT A COMPONENT OF AN |
| ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, SEE FBC 402.2. |
| |
| A RAMP IN THE EXISTING BUILDING IS SHOWN, BUT THE ROUTE |
| IS NOT CLEAR. A1.01 AND OTHER SHEETS DO NOT CLEARLY |
| SHOW HOW AN OCCUPANT ENTERS THE BUILDING FROM THE RAMP. |
| THE RAMP DOES NOT APPEAR TO LEAD TO AN ENTRANCE TO THE |
| BUILDING. |
| |
| THE WIDTH OF THE ROUTE (BASE OF STAIRS TO BUILDING) IS |
| NOT CLEAR IF THE RAMP IN THE BACK OF THE BUILDING IS |
| THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. THIS ROUTE APPEARS CUMBERSOME AND |
| MORE DIFFICULT THAN THE ROUTE THROUGH THE FRONT; |
| LONGER, GOES THROUGH AN EXIT STAIR, TWO DOORS, AND AN |
| UNIDENTIFIED AREA. IF THIS IS PROPOSED AS THE |
| ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, PLEASE GET THIS APPROVED VIA EMAIL |
| PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL BY SENDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| VIA EMAIL. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW: PLEASE SEE FBC A LOCATION (PARTIAL TEXT): |
| |
| ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL COINCIDE WITH OR BE LOCATED IN |
| THE SAME AREA AS GENERAL CIRCULATION PATHS. |
| |
| SEE ALSO ADVISORY 206.3: |
| |
| THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE MUST BE IN THE SAME AREA AS THE |
| GENERAL CIRCULATION PATH .... ADDITIONALLY, ACCESSIBLE |
| VERTICAL INTERIOR CIRCULATINO MUST BE IN THE SAME AREA |
| AS STAIRS AND ESCALATORS, NOT ISOLATED IN THE BACK OF |
| THE FACILITY. |
| |
| AS PER OUR TELEPHONE DISCUSSION, PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR |
| THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. THE FIRST DESIGN INCLUDED A RAMP |
| ADJACENT TO THE STAIRS, SO ALL OCCUPANTS ENTER FROM THE |
| SAME AREA FACING THE DROP OFF LOCATION. THE NEW DESIGN |
| HAS ALL OCCUPANTS ENTERING VIA THE SAME AREA, BUT THE |
| ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE IS AT THE REAR AND HAS AN |
| ADDITIONAL 65 FEET OF TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ARRIVE AT THE |
| ELEVATOR. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS IS AN EQUIVALENT |
| FACILITATION. |
| |
| 7. FBC 107, AS THIS PERMIT WAS READY FOR ISSUANCE, |
| SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION WHICH IS NO LONGER APPLICABLE |
| IS IN THE PACKAGE (SUCH AS ENERGY CALCS). PLEASE TREAT |
| THESE THE SAME AS PLANS; THE ONES WHICH SHOULD BE |
| REMOVED SHOULD BE MARKED VOID AND RETAINED SEPARATELY, |
| WITH THE VOIDED PLAN SHEETS. ASSEMBLE TWO SETS OF |
| SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW. |
| |
| 18. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE FOLLOWING |
| PROVISOS: |
| |
| BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE OR |
| FORM BOARD SURVEY SHOWING PROPOSED ELEVATIONS IS |
| REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR |
| FINISHED CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE IS REQUIRED |
| PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION. |
| |
| NEW COMMENT 2/16: |
| |
| AFTER REVIEW OF THE ACTUAL CIRCULATION PATH (OF WHICH I |
| WAS PREVIOUSLY NOT AWARE) AND DISCUSSION WITH THE |
| BUILDING OFFICIAL, IT APPEARS THAT VERTICAL |
| ACCESSIBILITY SERVING THIS BUILDING IS REQUIRED. THE |
| PLAN PROPOSED THAT OCCUPANTS WHO CANNOT NAVIGATE THE |
| STAIRS ARE TO EXIT THE NEW BUILDING AND ENTER THE |
| ADJACENT BUILDING IN ORDER TO UTILIZE AN EXISTING |
| ELEVATOR. IT APPEARS THAT THE NEW BUILDING REQUIRES AN |
| ELEVATOR. |
| |
| SEE FBC 206.3: "WHERE CIRCULATION PATHS ARE INTERIOR, |
| REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL ALSO BE INTERIOR." |
| |
| FOR INSTANCE, AN OCCUPANT IN THE NEW BUILDING WHO IS |
| ABLE TO USE THE STAIRS CAN GO DIRECTLY TO THE SECOND |
| FLOOR AFTER ENTERING VIA ADMINISTRATION. SOMEONE UNABLE |
| TO USE THE STAIRS WILL BE REQUIRED TO EXIT THE BUILDING |
| AND ENTER A DIFFERENT BUILDING IN ORDER TO ACCESS THE |
| SECOND FLOOR OF THE NEW BUILDING. |
| |
| |
| |
| |