Date |
Text |
2015-03-21 11:09:12 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| 561-805-6724 |
| |
| A NOTE STATING THAT THIS IS A REPLACEMENT FOR AN |
| EXISTING SUN ROOM PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED. NO PERMIT |
| NUMBER OR OTHER EVIDENCE OF A PERMIT WAS PROVIDED. |
| |
| COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| |
| 1. THE NATURE OF EXISTING CONDITIONS IS NOT CLEAR. |
| |
| NO PERMITS FOR WINDOWS SINCE 1998/1999, SO ANY |
| IMPROVEMENTS WHICH EXIST CURRENTLY WOULD HAVE BEEN |
| PERMITTED PRIOR TO THAT TIME. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS |
| WOULD AFFECT BEDROOM EGRESS; PLEASE LABEL ROOMS WHICH |
| OPEN INTO THE SUN ROOM. |
| |
| PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL DETAIL FOR THE EXISTING WALLS. I |
| LOCATED RECORD TWO PERMITS FOR SCREEN PORCH BUT CANNOT |
| EASILY ACCESS THE PLANS FOR THESE PERMITS. IT IS NOT |
| CLEAR WHETHER THE EXISTING SUBSTRATE IN THE PORCH CAN |
| ACCOMODATE THE ADDITIONAL LOAD OF IMPACT WINDOWS. |
| |
| FBC 2010 RESIDENTIAL 301 |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW: |
| |
| AS PLANS STILL SHOW THE "SUNROOM" AS EXISTING, A |
| PARTIAL RECORDS RESEARCH (30 MINUTES) HAS BEEN DONE ON |
| CONTRACTOR'S BEHALF. |
| |
| HOUSE WAS PERMITTED UNDER PERMIT 5165D ON 9/21/1970. A |
| "SCREEN ENCLOSURE" WAS PERMITTED ON 1/14/71 (6199D). A |
| "SCREEN PORCH ADDITION" WAS PERMITTED ON 12/10/1982 |
| (3987I). THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THE SCREEN ENCLOSURE |
| PERMITTED TWICE WAS CONVERTED TO A "SUN ROOM" WITH |
| WINDOWS. THERE ARE TWO ISSUES TO ADDRESS; STRUCTURAL |
| AND EGRESS. |
| |
| THE PLAN PROVIDED SHOWS TWO BEDROOMS WITH WINDOWS TO |
| THE OUTSIDE AS WELL AS OPENINGS INTO THE SUN ROOM. |
| PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR EACH AS WELL AS OPENING TYPE |
| (TYPE OF WINDOW), FBC 2010 RESIDENTIAL 310. |
| |
| THE FIRST SCREEN PORCH SHOWS "EXISTING FOOTING & FLOOR |
| SLAB - MIN 8" X 12" 2 #4". I WAS UNABLE TO SEE PLANS |
| FOR THE SECOND "SCREEN PORCH ADDITION" PERMIT #3987I. |
| IT IS SUGGESTED THAT YOU DO A RECORDS RESEARCH REQUEST |
| TO DETERMINE WHAT PLANS ARE AVAILABLE FOR THAT PERMIT, |
| IF ANY. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE ROOF AND RELATED |
| STRUCTURE WAS DONE AT THAT TIME, BUT BASED ON THE |
| DESCRIPTION IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT WINDOWS WERE |
| PERMITTED. |
| |
| [email protected] FOR RECORDS RESEARCH REQUEST. |
| |
| PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL PLAN WHICH DEMONSTRATES THAT THE |
| STRUCTURE CAN ACCOMODATE THE ADDITIONAL WEIGHT OF THE |
| IMPACT WINDOWS. BASED ON THE PERMIT DESCRIPTION, IT |
| APPEARS THAT SCREEN WAS PERMITTED. A MORE THOROUGH |
| RESEARCH MAY PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. |
| |
| AN IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT MAY BE REQUIRED. |
| |
| |
| |