Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 14120909
Permit Number 14120909
Review Stop B
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2015-08-10 07:21:462010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION
 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013.
 REVISION REQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT
  
 ****PROVISOS****
 ISSUED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK
 THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE PROVISO ITEMS, REVISION
 REQUIRED PRIOR TO FIRST INSPECTION
 ITEMS ABOVE ARE TO BE DONE PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION
 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE ADDRESSED IF PLANS ARE
 RESUBMITTED FOR OTHER TRADES. IF PLANS ARE NOT
 RESUBMITTED, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL BE PROVISO ITEMS,
 REVISION REQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT.
  
 PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT COMMENTS HAVE BEEN REARRANGED
 AND RENUMBERED FOR CLARITY. COMMENTS WHICH ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED AT THIS TIME (AS OTHER TRADES FAILED AND A
 RESUBMITTAL IS REQUIRED) ARE BELOW. THE ITEMS WHICH ARE
 TO BE ADDRESSED AT A FUTURE DATE, OR ARE INFORMATIONAL
 ONLY, ARE NOW ALL AT THE END OF THE COMMENT LIST.
  
 1. ARCHITECT?S RESPONSE INCLUDED BUILDING REVIEWS 1 AND
 2. IF RESUBMITTING, ONLY CURRENT ITEMS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED.
  
 2. FBC 107, AN OVERALL INDEX WAS PROVIDED (SHEET G000C)
 BUT THE INDEX IS NOT IN THE SAME ORDER AS THE
 PROJECTDOX FILES AND MANY SHEETS ARE STILL OUT OF
 ORDER. THIS HAS RESULTED IN ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW TIME
 FOR ALL REVIEWERS TO ATTEMPT TO LOCATE PAGES AND SERIES
 OF PLANS WITHIN THE FILE. A REVIEW OF PLAN ORDER WILL
 BE DONE PRIOR TO THE NEXT PLAN REVIEW.
  
 SOME ITEMS MAY HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED DUE TO THIS
 ISSUE. SOME OF THE PROJECTDOX ISSUES ARE:
  
 PHASE ONE/VOLUMEN ONE, EVERYTHING AFTER A625 (INCLUDING
 A626-644, INTERIORS, FOOD SERVICE) IS MISSING (FILES DO
 NOT FOLLOW SHEET A625 AS INDEX STATES, BUT ARE
 SCATTERED THROUGHOUT THE PLAN). THERE ARE A TOTAL OF AT
 LEAST 17 SHEETS WHICH ARE OUT OF ORDER. REPEAT COMMENT.
  
 IN101A BELONGS IN PHASE I, IS OUT OF ORDER AND IN PHASE
 2. THIS COMMENT APPLIES TO ALL OF THE IN SHEETS (OUT OF
 ORDER, PAGES ARE SCATTERED THROUGHOUT THE PLAN). REPEAT
 COMMENT.
  
 THE ORDER OF THE PHASE / VOLUMEN IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH
 THE ORDERING OF THE PHASE / VOLUMEN IN THE PROJECTDOX
 FILE
  
 PHASE 2 IRRIGATION SHEETS ARE NOT INCLUDED ON EITHER
 INDEX (G000C OR PHASE TWO VOLUMEN TWO INDEX)
  
 2110 - G000B DOESN'T INCLUDE FS (FOOD SERVICE) SHEETS,
 BUT THERE ARE FS SHEETS WHICH FOLLOW THE T (TECHNOLOGY)
 SHEETS. FS SHEETS ARE SHOWN ON G000C, BUT NOT IN THE
 ORDER SHOWN.
  
 REGARDING NAMING OF SHEETS, PAGES HAVE BEEN DIFFICULT
 TO LOCATE DUE TO INCONSISTENT INDEX AND NAMING
 CONVENTION WHICH IS NOT TYPICAL. SP WAS USED FOR SITE
 POOL, BUT IS USUALLY SITE PLAN. FS WAS USED FOR FOOD
 SERVICE, BUT THIS NAME IS USUALLY ASSIGNED TO FIRE
 SPRINKLER PAGES. K IS THE LETTER TYPICALLY USED FOR
 KITCHEN EQUIPMENT PLANS. OTHER REVIEWERS ARE STILL
 UNABLE TO LOCATE PAGES WHICH REQUIRE REVIEW. A DETAILED
 EXPLANATION OF PLAN ORDER ISSUES IS AVAILABLE VIA EMAIL
 UPON REQUEST.
  
 SEE PREVIOUS LIST REGARDING THE ORDER OF THE SERIES
 WITHIN THE PROJECTDOX FILE. THIS WAS NOT FIXED FOR THIS
 SUBMITTAL.
  
 ARCHITECT PROVIDED A RESPONSE NARRATIVE FOR AN
 EXPLANATION OF THE FILE ORDER. THIS IS NOT CONSISTENT
 WITH THE NAMING CONVENTION USED FOR THE FILES WHICH
 WERE UPLOADED, SO THE NARRATIVE IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH
 THE PROJECTDOX DOCUMENT. IN A 602 PAGE PLAN, IT IS VERY
 TIME CONSUMING TO SPECTULATE AS TO LOCATION OF
 INFORMATION.
  
 3. APPENDIX C INCLUDES INFORMATION NOT INCLUDED IN THE
 SUMMARY PAGE PREPARED BY ARCHITECT. PER ARCHITECT?S
 COVER LETTER FOR THE APPENDIX DOCUMENT, APPENDIX C
 SHOULD INCLUDE ONLY FIRESTOP SYSTEMS AND DOOR HARDWARE
 INFORMATION.
  
 SOME PAGES INCLUDE INFORMATION REVIEWED BY OTHER TRADES
 (ELECTRICAL WIRING SPECS, COMMERCIAL KITCHEN EQUIPMENT
 SPECS, ETC.).
  
 THE SPEC BOOK SHEETS SUBMITTED HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED.
 SPEC BOOKS SHOULD NOT BE A PART OF THE PERMIT FILE AS
 THE PLANS ARE TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE. REMOVE THE SPEC
 SHEETS AND ALL OTHER SHEETS NOT INCLUDED ON THE
 APPENDIX SUMMARY FROM THE FILE. THEY SHOULD BE UPLOADED
 AS A SEPARATE FILE.
  
 IT WOULD HELPFUL IF THE COVER PAGE SUMMARY (WHICH
 SERVES AS AN INDEX) WOULD INCLUDE PAGE NUMBERS. THE
 DOCUMENT IS 191 PAGES. ANY LARGE DOCUMENT SHOULD BE
 PAGINATED, FBC 107. OR, SPLIT THE DOCUMENT INTO SEVERAL
 DOCUMENT.
  
 4. A101 DOES NOT MATCH THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN AND OTHER
 SHEETS, PLEASE CORRELATE. IT IS DIFFICULT TO PERFORM A
 LIFE SAFETY REVIEW WITH THE MULTIPLE GRAPHICS ON THE
 LIFE SAFETY PAGE, OVERALL FLOOR PLAN WHICH IS CLEAN IS
 AN OLD VERSION, AND THE ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN HAS
 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS (WAS NOT INTENDED TO USE FOR LIFE
 SAFETY). THE GRAPHICS ON THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN OBSCURES
 WALLS AND DOORS. SHEET A101 IS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE
 LIFE SAFETY REVIEW.
  
 5. G101 HAS A NOTE, TRAVEL DISTANCE TO GATE 48FT 10IN,
 APPEARS TO LEAD TO A DOOR, NOT A GATE, PLEASE REVISE.
 THIS IS THE SAME EXIT ACCESS WHICH GRAPHICALLY DEPICTS
 A WALL BLOCKING MEANS OF EGRESS, FBC 107.
  
 6. DINING SHOW A DOUBLE DOOR OPENING INTO POOL AREA
 WITH TRAVEL DISTANCE TO GATE 107FT 3IN, BUT NO EXIT
 SIGN. EXIT STRATEGY NOT CLEAR.
  
 7. FBC 1005.1, THE LOSS OF ONE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL
 NOT REDUCE THE CAPACITY TO LESS THAN 50 PERCENT, SEE
 POOL AREA. ONE EXIT SIGN IS ADJACENT TO TWO GATES
 (DOUBLE AND SINGLE), OCCUPANT LOADS LISTED FOR BOTH, AS
 WELL AS OCCUPANT LOAD STATED FOR THE EXIT TO THE SOUTH,
 NO EXIT SIGNS FROM BUILDING TO POOL AREA, NOT CLEAR
 WHICH 452 OCCUPANTS ARE EXITING THROUGH THIS AREA (59,
 117, 276 LABELED FOR POOL GATES).
  
 8. OK OR MOVED TO END OF COMMENT LIST (INFORMATIONAL OR
 FUTURE PROVISO ITEMS, NOT REQUIRED TO BE ADDRESSED WITH
 THE REVISION)
  
 9. G101, CORRIDOR 187 IS NOT A RATED CORRIDOR BUT
 SERVES THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS AS THERE IS AN EXIT SIGN
 FROM CORRIDOR 188 TO CORRIDOR 187, FBC TABLE 1018.1.
 THERE IS A NOTE WHICH STATES THAT TRAVEL DISTANCE IS
 134FT, BUT IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE THIS IS APPLICABLE.
  
 SEE OTHER COMMENT REGARDING EXIT ENCLOSURE DEFINITION;
 REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY MEANS OF EGRESS COMPONENTS AND
 EXIT STRATEGY.
  
 10. A101A AND G101, 47 FIXED SEATS SHOWN INCLUDING ONE
 COMPANION SEAT (TWO ARE REQUIRED BUT CAN BE MOVABLE IF
 COMPARABLE TO FIXED SEATING), TWO WHEELCHAIR SPACES
 APPEAR TO BE SHOWN (NOT MARKED, BUT RECTANGLES ARE
 SHOWN) BUT AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 46 STATED AND NO
 OCCUPANT LOAD STATED FOR THE THEATER VESTIBULE. PLEASE
 CLARIFY THE MATH AND OCCUPANT LOAD. ALSO INCORPORATE A
 STATEMENT THAT ANY STAFF MEMBERS ENTERING THIS ROOM
 WILL BE USING ONE OF THE SEATS OR ADD A REASONABLE
 NUMBER OF STAFF MEMBERS TO THE OCCUPANT LOAD.
  
 REVISE PLAN TO LABEL THE TWO WHEELCHAIR SPACES AS SUCH.
  
 11. PROVISO, G101 AND A213, THE DOORS FOR THE MULTI
 PURPOSE ROOM INCLUDE SIDELIGHTS WHICH APPEAR TO BE
 IDENTICAL TO THE DOORS BUT DO NOT OPERATE. SEE FBC
 1008.1, REVISE PLAN TO SHOW HOW THE DOORS WILL BE
 EASILY DISTINGUISHABLE FROM THE INOPERABLE SIDELITES.
  
 SIGNAGE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE DUE TO THE LARGE NUMBER OF
 OCCUPANTS ATTEMPTING TO EXIT. ALSO SIGNAGE WOULD BE
 CONFUSING; SIGN STATES THIS IS NOT AN EXIT, BUT IT IS
 AN EXIT; UNLESS THE SIGN IS POSTED ON THE SIDELITE,
 SIGNAGE IS NOT CLEAR AS TO WHAT IS NOT AN EXIT.
  
 THIS ISSUE WILL BE A PROVISO ITEM. THE SIDELITES ARE
 GRAPHICALLY SHOWN AS IDENTICAL TO THE DOORS.
  
 THIS APPLIES TO BOTH DOORS 126 AND 124 (AND ANY OTHER
 DOORS AS APPLICABLE).
  
 12. FROM PREVIOUS LISTS, G101, AEROBICS 146 AND FITNESS
 143 APPEAR TO HAVE AN OCCUPANT LOAD OVER 50, BUT SECOND
 EXIT ACCESS NOT CLEAR. AEROBICS ROOM HAS TWO DOORS BUT
 BOTH LEAD TO SAME CORRIDOR (COMMON PATH). FITNESS ROOM
 HAS ONLY ONE EXIT ACCESS. TWO MEANS OF EGRESS REQUIRED
 FROM SPACES WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OVER 50, TWO EXITS
 REQUIRED FOR THE AREA.
  
 2ND REVIEW, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. ARCHITECT RESPONSE
 IS THAT THE ROOMS INDIVIDUALLY HAVE AN OCCUPANT LOAD
 LESS THAN 50.
  
 AEROBICS AND FITNESS ROOMS EACH SEPARATELY HAVE AN
 OCCUPANT LOAD LESS THAN 50 BUT TOGETHER HAVE AN
 OCCUPANT LOAD OVER 50 WITH THE PARTITION OPEN. TO TREAT
 EACH AREA SEPARATELY, REPLACE THE MOVABLE PARTITION
 WITH A WALL. OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION IS STATED AS
 BUSINESS. THIS SHOULD BE ASSEMBLY, SEE DEFINITION.
 REGARDLESS OF OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION, THE DOORS ARE
 TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL (146 AND 146A),
 1008.1.2 AS OCCUPANT LOAD EXCEEDS 50 WITH THE PARTITION
 OPEN.
  
 TRAVEL DISTANCE IS MEASURED TO THE GALLERY WHICH IS
 CALLED AN EXIT ENCLOSURE. SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING
 THE DEFINITION OF EXIT ENCLOSURE. NOTE THAT AS
 DESIGNED, ALL OCCPANTS OF THIS AREA ARE FORCED TO GO
 THROUGH THE GALLERY WHICH IS OPEN TO TWO ELEVATORS.
  
 CONSIDER THE SCENARIO THAT SHOULD THERE BE AN ISSUE
 (FIRE OR SMOKE) IN THE ELEVATOR SHAFT, OCCUPANTS FOR
 THIS AREA ARE FORCED TO GO THROUGH A SMOKE FILLED EXIT
 ENCLOSURE. RATIONALE OF INCLUDING TWO ELEVATORS, TOILET
 ROOMS, LOW VOLTAGE SERVER ROOM, HOUSEKEEPING ROOM, OPEN
 LIVING ROOM LIBRARY, WORK ROOM IN AN ?EXIT ENCLOSURE?
 IS NOT CLEAR.
  
 SEE ALSO IBC CODE AND COMMENTARY 2009 (THE BASE CODE
 FOR FBC 2010), PAGE 7-62 (SECTION 708.14.1) WHERE
 ELEVATOR LOBBIES AND EXCEPTIONS ARE DISCUSSED AT
 LENGTH, WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES:
  
 OF COURSE, THE ELEVATOR HOISTWAY DOORS CAN NEVER OPEN
 INTO AN EXIT ENCLOSURE.
  
 REVISE PLAN SO THAT THE EXIT ENCLOSURE INCLUDES ONLY
 ITEMS WHICH DO NOT POSE A HAZARD TO THE EXIT ENCLOSURE.
 THE LIVING ROOM WILL CONTAIN FURNITURE AND OTHER
 COMBUSTIBLES (HAZARD). THE ELEVATORS THEMSELVES POSE A
 HAZARD (EVEN WITH PRESSURIZATION). THE OTHER ROOMS
 CURRENTLY SHOWN WITHIN THE EXIT ENCLOSURE SHOULD ALSO
 BE SEPARATED FROM THE EXIT ENCLOSURE.
  
 REVISE PLAN SO THAT EXIT STRATEGY ADDRESSES THESE
 CONCERNS.
  
 13. AN ADDITIONAL DOOR WAS PROVIDED TO ADDRESS THE DEAD
 END BUT SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING TWO EXITS REQUIRED
 AND USE OF THE GALLERY AS AN EXIT ENCLOSURE. PRIOR TO
 RESUBMITTAL, ENSURE THAT NO NEW DEAD ENDS ARE CREATED.
  
 14. G101, REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE OCCUPANT LOAD AND AREA
 FOR THE FITNESS ROOM AND AEROBICS ROOM (SEPARATELY AS
 THE LARGER AREA CAN BE COMBINED TO TWO SMALLER AREAS).
 AS IT APPEARS THAT THE AEROBICS AND FITNESS AREA
 OCCUPANT LOAD WILL BE OVER 50, DOORS ARE TO SWING IN
 THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL, FBC 1008.1.2.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED. CHANGE DOOR SWING OR ADD A WALL AT THE
 LOCATION OF THE FOLDING PARTITION. OCCUPANT FOR THE
 ROOM WITH THE PARTITION IS OVER 50 (PER BUILDING
 OFFICIAL).
  
 15. THE AEROBICS AND FITNESS AREA OCCUPANT LOAD IS OVER
 50, FIRE EXIT HARDWARE OR PANIC HARDWARE REQUIRED FOR
 THOSE DOORS AND ALL OTHER DOORS IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS,
 FBC 1008.1.10, 1004.9.
  
 NOT ADDRESED.
  
 16. EGRESS GATE IS REQUIRED TO HAVE EITHER FIRE EXIT
 HARDWARE OR PANIC HARDWARE, FBC 1008.1.10, 1008.2.
 REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE THE REQUIREMENT OR DETAIL.
  
 RESPONSE LETTER STATES TO SEE AS102. INDEX SHOWS THE AS
 SERIES BEFORE A SHEETS. UNABLE TO LOCATE SHEET (NOT IN
 THIS LOCATION). COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 17. DOOR SCHEDULE HAS A COLUMN FOR ?ELECTRIC? BUT THAT
 COLUMN IS BLANK. IT APPEARS THAT THIS SHOULD BE
 APPLICABLE FOR SLIDING DOORS IN THE REQUIRED MEANS OF
 EGRESS AND EXIT. EXIT DOOR 122 (DOOR TYPE G1) SHOULD
 ALSO COMPLY WITH FBC 1008.1.4.2, 1008.1.4.3.
  
 18. A601 AND G101, DOORS IN FIRE BARRIERS REQUIRE A 45
 MINUTE FIRE RATING, FBC TABLE 715.4. IT IS NOT CLEAR
 WHICH DOORS ARE BEING CONSIDERED IN A CORRIDOR RATHER
 THAN AN OCCUPANCY SEPARATION. SEE DOORS 173C, 182, 172,
 183.
  
 DOOR 173C IS A 20 MINUTE DOOR, BUT THE CORRIDOR 184
 RATING IS NOT CONTINUOUS AS IT APPEARS TO TRANSITION
 INTO THE GALLERY. USE OF CORRIDORS, INCIDENTAL AND
 ACCESSORY USES FBC 508 ARE NOT ENTIRELY CLEAR. IF ANY 1
 HOUR RATINGS ON THE PLAN ARE REMOVED WHEN RESUBMITTING,
 PLEASE ALSO NOTE ALSO SMOKE AND PROTECTION REQUIREMENT
 IN 508.2.5.2.
  
 19. SEE G102 AND OTHER FLOORS, THERE IS AN UNIDENTIFIED
 1 HOUR RECTANGLE ADJACENT TO THE ELEVATOR 2-2. THIS
 AREA IS NOT IDENTIFIED ON A102, A102A. FBC 107, USE OF
 THIS SPACE AND REQUIRED FIRE RESISTANCE RATING NOT
 CLEAR.
  
 20. THE MCKEON DOOR SPECIFIED DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS OF FBC 715.4. THE DOOR SPEC SHEET STATES
 THAT IT MEETS UL 10B FOR 20 MINUTES. SEE G101, 45
 MINUTE AND 60 MINUTE ARE REQUIRED.
  
 21. PLANS IN MANY LOCATIONS USE THE LANGUAGE "UNDER
 SEPARATE PERMIT" (FOR INSTANCE, SHEET 036 - S6.2). IF
 ALL WORK TO BE INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT, REVISE
 LANGUAGE.
  
 PLANS STILL REFER TO SEPARATE PERMIT FOR PHASE I AND
 PHASE II. PHASE ONE PLANS REFER TO PHASE TWO AS A
 SEPARATE PERMIT. PHASE TWO REFERS TO PHASE ONE AS A
 SEPARATE PERMIT. SEE OTHER COMMENT REGARDING
 CONSIDERING PUTTING THE TWO PHASES INTO TWO SEPARATE
 PERMITS. IF ALL WORK TO REMAIN UNDER ONE PERMIT, PLEASE
 REVISE LANGUAGE AS IT IS CONFUSING. SEE FBC 107, PLANS
 SHOULD BE CLEAR AS TO SCOPE AND NATURE OF WORK.
  
 22. INCORPORATE FIRE RATING REQUIREMENTS AND DETAILS
 FOR THE FLOOR, STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS FBC TABLE 601.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED. DETAILS SHOWING THE TESTED ASSEMBLY OR
 CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE REQUIRED, SEE FBC 703. A
 STATEMENT IN A RESPONSE LETTER THAT EVERYTHING COMPLIES
 IS NOT ADEQUATE TO DEMONSTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE FOR THIS
 HIGH RISE BUILDING.
  
 NOTE THAT THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN, WHICH SHOWS OTHER FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATINGS, IS LACKING INFORMATION REGARDING
 EXTERIOR WALLS AND STRUCTURAL FRAME. PROPOSED FIRE
 RATING FOR THE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS IS NOT CLEAR. IT IS
 NOT CLEAR WHETHER FBC TABLE 601 OR 602 WILL DETERMINE
 THE EXTERIOR WALL RATINGS.
  
 NEW COMMENTS DUE TO NEW INFORMATION:
  
 23. CLOUDS INDICATING CHANGES FROM REVISION 0 TO
 REVISION 4 HAVE BEEN REMOVED. FOUR VERSIONS OF G101
 HAVE BEEN UPLOADED TO PROJECT DOX. ONE SET WAS NOT
 REVIEWED (VERSION 2) AND IT APPEARS THAT VERSION 3 HAS
 BEEN UPLOADED TWICE.
  
 PLEASE RETAIN ALL CLOUDS FOR CHANGES NOT REVIEWED
 (FUTURE REVISIONS).
  
 24. G101, AREA SCHEDULE (GROSS BUILDING) IS LACKING THE
 TOTAL AND ALSO LACKS THIRD THROUGH SEVENTH FLOOR, FBC
 107, FBC 107.
  
 25. G101, AT 3 HOUR FIRE WALL, PLAN STATES THAT 1 HOUR
 FIRE PROTECTION IS REQUIRED (EXTENDED 4 FT FROM FIRE
 WALL). SEE FBC TABLE 601 AND 602; BASED ON OTHER MORE
 STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS, 1 HOUR DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE
 SUFFICIENT. BEARING WALLS ARE TO BE 3 HOURS. SEE OTHER
 COMMENT REGARDING FIRE RATING DETAILS.
  
 26. A352, PT WOOD AND EXT PLYWOOD IS SHOWN. SEE FBC
 603, 717.5, 718.3, IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS AN
 EXCESSIVE AMOUNT OF COMBUSTIBLE, NON FRT LUMBER
 INSTALLED AT 130 FT. EITHER REVISE TO NON COMBUSTIBLE
 MATERIALS OR PROVIDE RATIONALE OR EXCEPTION.
  
 27. G101, ROOM TO THE NORTH OF AIR HANDLER ROOM 180 IS
 NOT LABELED.
  
 28. G101, THE DINING ROOM EGRESS (SOUTH EAST CORNER OF
 DISPLAY KITCHEN DINING B) PATH TO WOUTH EXIT GOES
 THROUGH A WALL, SEE THE L SHAPE AREA BETWEEN NORTH
 WALLS OF OFFICE 163C AND DRY STORAGE 166. REVISE OR
 CLARIFY.
  
 29. SP AND WF SHEETS, NEW POOL AND WALL FOUNTAIN PLANS
 WERE SUBMITTED. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED AT THIS
 TIME AND REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS. HOWEVER, IN TAKING A
 CURSORY GLANCE AT THE PLANS, IT APPEARS THAT THE POOL
 WAS DESIGNED TO FBC 2010 RESIDENTIAL DUE TO THE FBC
 2010 RESIDENTIAL REFERENCES ON THE PLANS.
  
 30. ENERGY CALCS WERE SUBMITTED. INCLUDED ON THE ENERGY
 CALCS IS A GAS HOT WATER BOILER, BETWEEN 300,000 AND
 2.5 MILLION BTUS. SEE FBC 1015.3 REGARDING EXITING
 REQUIREMENTS FOR BOILER ROOMS. WHERE IS THIS BOILER
 LOCATED? IT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN, FBC
 107. REVISE OR CLARIFY.
  
 31. REVISED SHEET G101 SHOWS TRAVEL DISTANCE AS 130FT
 FROM THE FITNESS LOUNGE TO THE EXIT ENCLOSURE. SEE THE
 DEFINITION OF CORRIDOR, FBC 1002, AN ENCLOSED EXIT
 ACCESS COMPONENT THAT DEFINES AND PROVIDES A PATH OF
 EGRESS TRAVEL TO AN EXIT.
  
 SEE ALSO DEFINITION OF EXIT ENCLOSURE, AN EXIT
 COMPONENT THAT IS SEPARATED FROM OTHER INTERIOR SPACES
 OF A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE BY FIRE RESISTANCE RATED
 CONSTRUCTION AND OPENING PROTECTIVES. MANY ROOMS ARE
 INCLUDED IN THE GALLERY (HOUSEKEEPING, LIVING ROOM,
 ELEVATOR LOBBIES, TOILET ROOMS, ETC.). DEFINITION
 STATES THAT AN EXIT ENCLOSURE IS TO BE SEPARATED FROM
 OTHER INTERIOR SPACES.
  
 THIS COMMENT ALSO APPLIES TO THE RESIDENTIAL AREA
 EXITING. RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR TAKES THE OCCUPANT
 THROUGH THE 1 HOUR RATED CORRIDOR THROUGH THIS GALLERY
 AREA, NOW CALLED AN EXIT ENCLOSURE, BUT THE GALLERY AS
 SHOWN ON G101 DOES NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN EXIT
 ENCLOSURE. AN EXIT ENCLOSURE IS TO BE SEPARATED FROM
 OTHER INTERIOR SPACES. ONCE AN OCCUPANT ENTERS THE
 EXIT, THE EXIT IS TO BE CONTINUOUS UNTIL THE EXIT
 DISCHARGE.
  
 32. CHANGES TO THE PROPERTY LINE (REPLAT) REQUIRE THAT
 COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 705.8 (MAXIMUM AREA OF
 EXTERIOR WALL OPENINGS BASED ON FIRE SEPARATION
 DISTANCE) AND FBC TABLE 602 (FIRE RESISTANCE RATING
 REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTERIOR WALLS BASED ON FIRE
 SEPARATION DISTANCE) BE SHOWN. A REVISION WILL BE
 REQUIRED PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION.
  
 33. REVISE SHEET G001, REQUIRED FIRE RESISTIVE RATINGS.
 DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE IS FOR GREATER THAN 30FT
 SEPARATION. AS THERE IS A PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN THE TWO
 BUILDINGS, THIS IS NOT ACCURATE. DUE TO THE EXCEPTION
 FOR ONE STORY (1 HOUR REDUCTION FBC TABLE 601 FOOTNOTE
 A), DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE (FBC TABLE 602) APPEARS
 TO BE MORE RESTRICTIVE (2 HOUR REEQUIRED FROM 5 FEET TO
 UNDER 20 FEET).
  
 34. THRESHOLD PLAN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY FS 553.79 TO
 BE CORRECTED ON STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. EVIDENCE THAT THIS
 HAS BEEN CORRECTED IS TO BE SENT TO ME VIA EMAIL PRIOR
 TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. PLANS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED AS A
 REVISION PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT IF PERMIT IS ISSUED THIS
 REVIEW CYCLE. IF PERMIT IS NOT ISSUED IN THIS REVIEW
 CYCLE, REVISED DRAWINGS TO BE RESUBMITTED. (EMAIL
 RECEIVED FROM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ON 8/18/15)
  
 35. AS ALL STRUCTURAL SHEETS ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 REVISED, SEE PREVIOUS LIST REGARDING THE ADDRESS ON THE
 PLAN AND REVISE. STRUCTURAL SHEETS STILL HAVE INCORRECT
 ADDRESS OF 4920 LORING DRIVE.
  
 36. UNIT 1A, SHOW CLEAR FLOOR SPACE CENTERED ON SINK,
 SHEET A 401A.
  
 37. AS 109, POOL BAR AREA, CLARIFY PURPOSE THIS AREA;
 IS THIS FOR STAFF ONLY (WORK AREA), OR FOR USE BY
 RESIDENTS AND THEIR GUESTS? THERE IS A STATEMENT ON THE
 PLAN WHICH STATES THAT AMENITY SPACES AND COMMON AREAS
 ARE ONLY USED BY RESIDENTS AND THEIR GUEST. THERE ARE
 OFFICES, SPA, LARGE RESTAURANT STYLE DINING AREA, BUT
 THE PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE WHICH AREAS ARE FOR USE BY
 EMPLOYEES.
  
 IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER ACCESSIBILITY OR FAIR HOUSING
 APPLIES. MORE INFORMATION REQUIRED; NO CLEAR FLOOR
 SPACE SHOWN FOR FIXTURES, SINK AND COUNTER ARE AT 40
 INCHES. WILL FOOD OR DRINKS BE SOLD AT THIS LOCATION?
 SEE FBC 2010 ACCESSIBILITY 804, 902, 904, 606, CFR
 100.205(C)(1).
  
 38. BREAK ROOM APPEARS TO BE FOR EMPLOYEE USE. SINK TO
 COMPLY WITH FBC 2010 ACCESSIBILITY 606.
  
 39. SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS REGARDING OTHER ACCESSIBILITY
 AND FAIR HOUSING AND REVISE PLAN TO SHOW APPLICABLE
 DIMENSIONS.
  
 40. SEE FIRE REPEAT COMMENT REGARDING FBC 403.3.2,
 SHEET 402, FIRE PUMP SHALL BE SUPPLIED BY A MINIMUM OF
 TWO WATER MAINS LOCATED IN DIFFERENT STREETS. AS WITH
 THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS, REVISE AND PROVIDE EVIDENCE VIA
 EMAIL THAT THIS ITEM HAS BEEN ADDRESSED.
 *****************************
 PROVISOS
 ISSUED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK
  
 1. AS PER OWNER?S AGREEMENT, A REPLAT WILL BE FILED
 WITHIN 45 DAYS OF PERMIT ISSUANCE. FINAL PLAT REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO C.O. A NEW SITE PLAN SHOWING DISTANCE TO THE
 NEW PROPERTY LINE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AS A
 REVISION.
  
 2. ADVISORY ONLY, SEPARATE PERMITS (PLANS, APPLICATION,
 REVIEWS, AND FEES) REQUIRED FOR PARKING LOT, SIGNAGE,
 AWNINGS, FENCING, POOL, TRELLIS, SITE WALL, SEPARATE
 BUILDINGS (INCLUDING GENERATOR BUILDING), FBC 107.
  
 3. THE FOLLOWING SHEETS HAVE BEEN VOIDED AND WERE NOT
 REVIEWED: SP101, SP102, SP103, SP104, SP105, SP106,
 WF101, WF102, AND WF103. SUBMIT THESE PAGES UNDER
 SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 4. ADVISORY ONLY, THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES WAS SENT VIA
 EMAIL, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES
 78-123, 78-126.
  
 THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE PROVISO THAT,
 WITHIN 90 DAYS OF ISSUANCE, THE APPROVAL WILL BE
 PROVIDED. PLEASE SEND A COPY OF THE APPROVAL WHEN
 AVAILABLE VIA EMAIL TO [email protected] IN ORDER TO
 DOCUMENT THE PERMIT FILE.
  
 5. ADVISORY ONLY, FS 553.79(7)(C) ALL SHORING AND
 RESHORING PROCEDURES, PLANS, AND DETAILS BE SUBMITTED
 TO THE ENFORCEMENT AGENCY FOR RECORDKEEPING.
 SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING TO BE SUBMITTED AT EACH
 LIFT. FAILURE TO SUBMIT SHORING/RESHORE PLANS TO THE
 BUILDING DIVISION FOR PLAN REVIEW AT THE TIME OF EACH
 LIFT MAY RESULT IN A STOP WORK ORDER. AS THIS ISSUE HAS
 BEEN PROBLEMATIC IN THE PAST, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT A
 NOTE BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PLAN.
  
 6. ADVISORY ONLY, PRODUCT APPROVALS REVIEWED BY
 DESIGNER OF RECORD ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW PRIOR
 TO INSTALLATION, FBC 107, FBC 1609 (SUBMITTAL, NO FEE).
 COMPONENTS AND CLADDING TO COMPLY WITH WALL PRESSURES
 SHOWN ON SHEET S8.5:
  
 ZONE 4 + 52.0 / - 52.2
 ZONE 5 + 52.0 / -95.7
  
 FOR ROOF COVERING, SEE ROOF PLAN REVIEW STOP OR SHEET
 S8.5 FOR PRESSURES.
  
 8. PROVISO, FBC 911.1.4, LAYOUT OF FIRE COMMAND CENTER
 AND ALL FEATURES REQUIRED BY 911.1.5 TO BE SUBMITTED
 AND APPROVED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
  
 9. PROVISO, G101 AND A213, THE DOORS FOR THE MULTI
 PURPOSE ROOM INCLUDE SIDELIGHTS WHICH APPEAR TO BE
 IDENTICAL TO THE DOORS BUT DO NOT OPERATE. SEE FBC
 1008.1, DOORS TO BE EASILY DISTINGUISHABLE FROM THE
 INOPERABLE SIDELITES.
  
 10. PROVISO, THE FOLLOWING TEST REPORTS FOR THE
 FLOORING UNDERLAYMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO
 INSTALLATION (INFORMATIONAL NOTE: PER S2.4, S3.1 FLOOR
 SLABS ARE 8IN, SO STC AND IIC TESTS ON AN 8IN SLAB OR
 LESS ARE ACCEPTABLE): STC (FBC 1207.2), IIC (FBC
 1207.3), ASTM E 84 (FBC 603.1).
  
 11. PROVISO, FBC 2010 ACCESSIBILITY 703, SIGNS TO
 COMPLY WITH THIS SECTION.
  
 12. PROVISO, DETAILS FOR UL ASSEMBLIES REFERENCED ON
 THE PLANS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED WITH OPTIONS NOTED PRIOR
 TO INSTALLATION. IF NOT PREPARED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD,
 SHOP DRAWING REVIEW REQUIRED PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL.
  
 AS THE EXTERIOR WALLS ARE FIRE RATED, DETAILS FOR
 STRUCTURE AND EXTERIOR WALLS REQUIRED PRIOR TO
 COMMENCEMENT.
  
 13. PROVISO, REVISED PLANS TO INCLUDE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT
 AREA, PER FLOOR, PER OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION, TO
 INCLUDE BOTH PHASE I AND PHASE II, FBC 107, FBC 109.
 VALUE (ADJUSTED PER ICC TABLE AND COTLEUR & HEARING
 SITE PLAN) WILL BE CONFIRMED AND MAY BE INCREASED.
 ISSUED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK.
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved