Date |
Text |
2016-04-22 07:38:34 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| 561-805-6724 |
| |
| 1. PER CONVERSATION WITH WENDY ANDERSON, INVESTIGATOR |
| FOR FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, THE TWO |
| ENGINEERS WHICH HAVE TAKEN OVER PORTIONS OF THE JOB |
| (MEPFT) ARE SUCCESSOR ENGINEERS (SEE FAC61G15-27.001) |
| AND, AS SUCH, MUST PROVIDE ALL DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY |
| THE ORIGINAL ENGINEER WITH THE SUCCESSOR PROFESSIONAL |
| ENGINEER'S TITLE BLOCK IN COMPLIANCE WITH WITH FS471 |
| AND FAC61G15-23.002. |
| |
| IT APPEARS THAT THE INTENT OF THE TITLE BLOCK |
| REQUIREMENT (FS471, FAC61G15-23.002) IS TO DEMONSTRATE |
| RESPONSIBILITY, AND FBPE RESPONSIBILITY IS TAKEN BY |
| INDIVIDUALS, NOT FIRMS. ALLOWING THE ORIGINAL |
| ENGINEER'S NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER TO REMAIN ON ALL |
| PLAN SHEETS (ALTHOUGH BOTH ORIGINAL ENGINEERS AND BOTH |
| SUCCESSOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ALL WORK FOR THE SAME |
| ENGINEERING FIRM) DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OR THE |
| LETTER OF THE LAW AND RULE. AS THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN |
| REVISED TWICE SINCE ISSUANCE, PLEASE DO THE FOLLOWING: |
| |
| IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE APPROVAL OF ALL SIGNATURE |
| DOCUMENTS, AND TO BRING THE PERMIT RECORD FILE INTO |
| COMPLIANCE, PROVIDE A DOCUMENT WHICH SHOWS THE HISTORY |
| OF EACH MEPFT SHEET (AND ANY OTHER SHEETS AFFECTED, IF |
| APPLICABLE). A SPREADSHEET IS SUGGESTED (AND IS |
| SOMETIMES PROVIDED TO US VOLUNTARILY FOR SOME PROJECTS |
| TO BETTER TRACK LARGE PROJECTS). |
| |
| FOR ALL SHEETS NOT SUPERSEDED BY SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS, |
| SUBMIT A REVISION WHICH CORRECTS THE TITLE BLOCK TO BE |
| IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAC61G15-27.001, FAC61G15-23.002. |
| |
| 2. THE FORMAT OF THE SIGNATURE DOCUMENT IS ACCEPTABLE |
| (ONE PDF DOCUMENT, COVER PAGE CLEARLY INDICATES EACH |
| SHEET FOR WHICH EACH DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IS TAKING |
| RESPONSIBILITY, AND EACH DESIGN PROFESSIONAL HAS SIGNED |
| AND SEALED EACH SHEET. |
| |
| THE BUILDING DIVISION WILL ALWAYS ACCEPT SIGNATURE |
| DOCUMENTS, DIGITAL SIGNATURES, ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES |
| WHICH ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW. A PREFERRED |
| PRACTICE MAY BE DEVELOPED. |
| |