Date |
Text |
2014-12-15 07:57:42 | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS |
| |
| 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| (561) 805-6714 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| |
| BUILDING |
| |
| 1) THE NEW PRODUCT APPROVALS (MI SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS, |
| FIXED WINDOWS AND SLIDING GLASS DOORS) THAT WERE |
| SUBMITTED ARE INCOMPLETE. THE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS |
| ARE REQUIRED. SUBMIT COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE |
| ITEMS THAT WILL BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE |
| 9N-3. |
| |
| 2) THERE WERE NO PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED FOR NEW |
| STRUCTURAL MULLIONS. THE ONES THAT WERE SUBMITTED AND |
| APPROVED ORIGINALLY ARE FROM LAWSON AND THE REVISED |
| WINDOWS ARE MI. FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE |
| REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND |
| APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| |
| 3) PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF THE WIND RESISTANCE TEST |
| REPORTS ( ASTM E 330 ) FOR THE "ELDORADO STONE" WALL |
| COVERING. FBC-R 703.1.2 |
| |
| 4) IN THE DOOR/WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET A3.0, THE |
| DESIGN PRESSURES ( +38.6 PSF, -40.0 PSF) FOR SLIDING |
| GLASS DOOR " 4D" DO NOT MATCH THE PRESSURES SPECIFIED |
| FOR THIS DOOR ON PLAN SHEETS A1.0 AND A1.1 (+38.1 PSF, |
| -42.9 PSF). FBC 107.2.1 |
| |
| 5) THERE WERE NOT ANY CHANGES ON SHEETS A2.0, A2.1 AND |
| P1.0 FROM THE APPROVED PLANS. OTHER THAN THE ITEMS |
| LISTED IN REVIEW NOTE #4, THE OTHER REVISED PLAN SHEETS |
| WERE OKAY. THERE WERE A TOTAL OF THIRTEEN (13) REVISED |
| PLAN SHEETS AND THREE (3) REVISED PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE THE WINDOW MULLION PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL THAT WAS NOT SUBMITTED. |
| |
| |