Date |
Text |
2015-03-27 14:01:18 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW |
| ___________________________________________ |
| |
| DATE OF REVIEW: 03.27.2015 |
| PERMIT NO.: 14120431 |
| ADDRESS: 23RD STREET / PONCE DE LEON AVENUE |
| CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: DANIEL PETROCCHI |
| TELEPHONE NO.: 305.495.3745 |
| SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW 99-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING. |
| ___________________________________________ |
| |
| REVIEW STATUS: FAILED |
| ___________________________________________ |
| |
| PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN |
| REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| |
| IMPORTANT - THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE |
| ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS, AS OULTINED IN |
| CHAPTER 78 - ARTICLE V OF THE CITY'S CODE OF |
| ORDINANCES. |
| |
| THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE ISSUED PREVIOUSLY, AND |
| APPEAR TO NOT HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED: |
| |
| 1. THE PROPOSED PLANS DIFFER FROM THAT WHICH WAS |
| APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION (RESOLUTION NO. |
| 146-12). A MINOR DSI AMENDMENT APPLICATION SHALL BE |
| SUBMITTED TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - |
| PLANNING DIVISION, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING |
| PERMIT. |
| |
| 2. SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL BE |
| SUBMITTED. APPLICATION SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY A |
| CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE (MATERIALS + LABOR). |
| |
| 3. THE SHADE/FLOWERING TREE SPACING ALONG THE EAST |
| BUFFER, JUST SOUTH OF 23RD STREET, EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM |
| SPACING. |
| |
| 4. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH A |
| PERMANENT IRRIGATION SYSTEM PROVIDING 120% COVERAGE. |
| |
| 5. SEPARATE IRRIGATION PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL BE |
| SUBMITTED. |
| |
| 6. SHEET A.001 INDICATES THAT THE CIVIL PLANS ARE |
| PROVIDED "FOR REFERENCE ONLY", BUT THE NOTES ON SHEET |
| A.200 INDICATE THAT THE CIVIL PLANS ARE TO BE UTILIZED |
| FOR ALL PARKING, ETC. PLEASE CLARIFY. WHAT PERMIT IS |
| THE PARKING AND OTHER SITE-RELATED IMPROVEMENTS BEING |
| COVERED UNDER? I HAVEN'T BEEN NOTIFIED OF ANY OTHER |
| PERMIT APPLICATIONS. |
| |
| 7. BIKE RACK DETAIL AND DIMENSIONED LAYOUT SHALL BE |
| PROVIDED. BIKE RACKS SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED AND |
| AVAILABLE FOR THE RETAIL SPACES...THE ONLY LOCATION |
| SHOWN ON THE PLAN APPEARS TO BE ONLY AVAILABLE TO |
| RESIDENTS FOR STORAGE. RESPONSE LETTER FROM ARCHITECT |
| INDICATES THAT THE DETAIL IS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS, |
| BUT IT WAS NOT. RESPONSE LETTER FROM LANDSCAPE |
| ARCHITECT INDICATES THAT THE DETAIL IS ON THE |
| ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, BUT IT WAS NOT. |
| |
| THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NEW AND ARE THE RESULT OF |
| THE REVISIONS SUBMITTED, OR WERE NOT IDENTIFIED AT THE |
| TIME OF THE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW: |
| |
| 8. ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE/PAVEMENT MARKING APPEARS TO BE |
| NEEDED TO REGULATED TRAFFIC FLOW IN THE GARAGE. I |
| BELIEVE WE'VE DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY THE ADDITION OF |
| SIGNS HANGING FROM THE CEILING OF THE GARAGE, NO LEFT |
| TURN SIGNS, ETC. |
| |
| 9. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT A CALL BOX WAS GONIG TO |
| BE INSTALLED AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE TO PROVIDE |
| ABILITY FOR GUESTS TO GAIN ACCESS AFTER THE GATES HAVE |
| BEEN CLOSED. |
| |
| 10. AS DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY, PLEASE PROVIDE THE |
| DIMENSION OF THE BALCONY PROJECTIONS ON THE ELEVATION, |
| SHOW THEM OUTLINED ON THE SITE PLAN, ETC. PLEASE NOTE |
| THAT BALCONIES, INCLUDING THEIR RAILINGS, SHALL NOT |
| ENCROACH MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACK. |
| |
| 11. THE PARKING SPACES CANNOT OVERHANG INTO THE |
| REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER. THIS IS AN ISSUE WITH THE |
| WESTERN-MOST ROW OF PARKING, AS WELL AS THE 2 SPACES |
| ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. AT THOSE SPACES ADJACENT |
| TO THE 4.5 LANDSCAPE BUFFER, WHEEL STOPS SHOULD BE |
| INSTALLED, OR THE CURB LINE MOVED IN 2 FEET, AND THE |
| SPACES SHOULD BE DESIGNATED AS "COMPACT". WITH THE |
| ADDITION OF THE HANDICAP SPACE ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY |
| LINE, THIS IS A PROBLEM BECAUSE THE AREA ONLY ALLOWS |
| FOR A 16 FOOT LONG SPACE, WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE |
| MINIMUM DIMENSIONS FOR A HANDICAP PARKING STALL. |
| |
| 12. DATA TABLE ON SHEET A2.00 INDICATES 19 COMPACT |
| SPACES, BUT ONLY THREE ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. |
| |
| 13. THE LANDSCAPING ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE |
| BUILDING, AND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY, |
| CONFLICTS WITH THE PROPOSED METAL CANOPY ACROSS THE |
| FIRST FLOOR. THE CANOPY WILL NEED TO BE SEGMENTED AND |
| INSTALLED BETWEEN THE TREES AT THE ENTRANCES/WALKWAYS |
| INTO THE RETAIL SPACES. |
| |
| 14. EACH COMPACT SPACE WILL NEED TO BE SIGNED/MARKED AS |
| SUCH. |
| |
| 15. LANDSCAPING NEEDS TO BE INSTALLED IN THE NORTHWEST |
| CORNER OF THE PROPERTY, AS THIS IS A REQUIRED LANDSCAPE |
| BUFFER. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE GATE INTO THE POOL |
| AREA, AND THE DOOR ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING |
| CROSS THE PROPERTY LINE AND TIE INTO THE EXISTING |
| SIDEWALK ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. THIS WOULD REQUIRE |
| AN EASEMENT FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY BUT WILL ALLOW |
| LANDSCAPING TO BE INSTALLED ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| |
| 16. IT DOESN'T APPEAR TO MAKE SENSE FOR THE ALUMINUM |
| FENCE TO EXTEND AS FAR EAST AS IT DOES, ON THE SOUTH |
| PROPERTY LINE. THIS CREATES A 2-3 FOOT AREA BETWEEN THE |
| FENCE AND THE BUILDING THAT WILL BE VERY DIFFICULT TO |
| MAINTAIN, ETC. |
| |
| 17. IS THERE ANY WAY TO REINTRODUCE WINDOWS, ETC. INTO |
| THE WEST ELEVATION? |
| |
| THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL |
| PURPOSES ONLY: |
| |
| 18. ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY |
| SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PERMITTING BY THE CITY?S |
| ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. |
| |
| 19. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS OF |
| ALL OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR UPGRADES NECESSARY TO |
| EFFECTUATE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT |
| LIMITED TO WATER MAINS, LIFT STATIONS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY, |
| ETC. |
| |
| 20. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING |
| AND MAINTAINING ALL LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE PUBLIC |
| RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE DEVELOPER SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITS, |
| AGREEMENTS, EASEMENTS, ETC. THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO |
| EFFECTUATE SUCH INSTALLATION. |
| |
| ___________________________________________ |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| ___________________________________________ |
| |
| QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| |
| JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| |
| PHONE: 561.822.1448 |
| FAX: 561.822.1460 |
| |
| EMAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| WWW.WPB.ORG |
| |