Date |
Text |
2015-04-09 15:51:10 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| PERMIT: 14120130 |
| ADD: 1901 S. DIXIE HWY. |
| CONT: SISCACONSTRUCTION |
| TEL: (561)686-5545 |
| |
| 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W |
| * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA |
| BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION |
| 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. |
| |
| 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 |
| COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, |
| SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS |
| OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW |
| DATE: THURS. 09/ 2015 |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| 1) COVERSHEET INDICATES UNDER THE CODE ANALYSIS: |
| 1A-B) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 1C) 2ND REQUEST SUBMIT FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS. THE PLANS |
| INDICATE THERE IS AN EXISTING FIRE SPRINKLER. NOT SHOWN |
| ON PLANS NOR IS THERE ANY ADDITIONAL LAYOUT OF FIRE |
| SPRINKLER HEADS FOR THE PROPOSED MEZZANINE LEVEL. SINCE |
| THIS IS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY UNDER THE EXISITNG |
| BUILDING CODE SECTION 904.1 REFERS TO SECTION 912. |
| |
| 2010 EXT. BLDG. CODE 912.2.1 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. |
| WHERE A CHANGE IN OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION OCCURS THAT |
| REQUIRES AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO BE |
| PROVIDED BASED ON THE NEW OCCUPANCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| CHAPTER 9 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, SUCH |
| SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE AREA WHERE THE |
| CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY OCCURS. |
| |
| 2010 FBC-B 903.1.2 GROUP A2 WHEN THE FIRE AREA HAS AN |
| OCCUPANT LOAD OF 100 OR MORE FIRE SPRINKLERS ARE |
| REQUIED. |
| 107.3.5 MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR BUILDINGS. |
| 107.3.5.1 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS |
| 5. FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS SHALL INCLUDE: SCHEMATIC |
| FIRE SPRINKLERS |
| |
| 2) SITE PLAN AP 1.0: |
| |
| 2A) 2ND REQUEST. NOTE THE SITE PLAN APPEARS THE FRONT |
| ENTRY WALL AND DOOR IS WITHIN OR ON THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| 2010 FBC-B 3202.2 ENCROACHMENTS ABOVE GRADE AND BELOW 8 |
| FEET IN HEIGHT. DOORS AND WINDOWS SHALL NOT OPEN OR |
| PROJECT INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| |
| 2B) 2ND REQUEST. THE DISPROPORTIONATE COST SUBMITTED |
| WAS REJECTED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL THERE ARE LINE |
| ITEMS THAT DO NOT PERTAIN TO ACCESSIBILITY. PLEASE |
| REVIEW SECTION |
| 202.4.2 ACCESSIBILITY WHICH CAN BE DEDUCTED, : (I) AN |
| ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE; (II) AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE |
| ALTERED AREA; (III) AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM |
| FOR EACH SEX OR A SINGLE UNISEX RESTROOM; (V) |
| ACCESSIBLE DRINKING FOUNTAINS AND (VI) WHEN POSSIBLE |
| PARKING LOTS. THE FRONT ENTRY OVER THE PROPERTY LINE |
| THE COST OF REFRAMING, THE DOOR FRAME AND LABOR CAN NOT |
| BE COUNTED, A NEW ACCESSIBLE THRESHOLD OR DOOR LATCH |
| YES, RESTROOMS COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH MAKING RESTROOMS |
| ACCESSIBLE, SUCH AS INSTALLING GRAB BARS, ENLARGING |
| TOILET STALLS, INSULATING PIPES, OR INSTALLING |
| ACCESSIBLE FAUCET CONTROLS; THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WOULD |
| ALLOW THE REFRAMING FOR ACCESSIBLE RESTROOMS. |
| |
| THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE PARKING LOT DOUBLE |
| STRIPED TO THE CITY MUNI CODE. THE SITE PLANS FAILS TO |
| SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2010 FL. EXT. BLDG. CODE 906.1 |
| WHICH REFERS YOU BACK TO THE 2010 FL. ACCESSIBILTY CODE |
| SEE SECTION 202.4.1 AND 202.4.1 DISPROPORTIONATE COST. |
| EITHER THE CONTRACTOR OR DESIGNER OF RECORD ON THEIR |
| LETTER HEAD PROVIDE A COST BREAKDOWN WHERE $67,200.00 |
| DOLLORS WILL BE SPENT IN ACCESSIBLE UPGRADES. PLEASE |
| NOT THE ORDER IN WHICH THE FUNDS ARE TO BE SPENT. FL |
| ACC. CODE 202.4.2. (I) AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE; (II) AN |
| ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE ALTERED AREA; (III) AT LEAST |
| ONE ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM FOR EACH SEX OR A SINGLE UNISEX |
| RESTROOM; (IV) ACCESSIBLE TELEPHONES; (V) ACCESSIBLE |
| DRINKING FOUNTAINS; AND (VI) WHEN POSSIBLE, ADDITIONAL |
| ACCESSIBLE ELEMENTS SUCH AS PARKING, STORAGE, AND |
| ALARMS. |
| |
| ZONING STATED THAT THE 50% RULE FOR LANDSCAPING BUT IT |
| WOULD NOT REQUIRE THE RESTRIPPING OF THE PARKING LOT, |
| IT WILL BE DETERMINED BY IF THE FUNDS SENT FOR |
| DISPROPORTIONALITY ARE USED UP BEFORE THE PARKING LOT |
| GETS INVOLVED FOR ACCESSIBLITY. |
| |
| 2C) NOTE TO GAIN ENTRY TO THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING YOU |
| WILL BE CROSSING A ALLEYWAY WHERE DETECTABLE WARNINGS |
| WOULD BE REQUIRED SINCE THIS IS A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. |
| 2010 FL. ACCESSIBILITY CODE 705. |
| |
| 3) COMPLIED, WINDOW PRESSURES ARE GOOD. |
| |
| 4-5) BUILDING PROVISO: 107.3.4.2 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. |
| FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, DEFERRED SUBMITTALS |
| ARE DEFINED AS THOSE PORTIONS OF THE DESIGN THAT ARE |
| NOT SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF THE APPLICATION AND THAT |
| ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN A |
| SPECIFIED PERIOD. DEFERRAL OF ANY SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL |
| HAVE THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE |
| REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE |
| SHALL LIST THE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ON THE CONSTRUCTION |
| DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE |
| SUBMITTED TO THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN |
| RESPONSIBLE CHARGE WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD |
| THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION |
| INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE |
| BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO |
| THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL |
| ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE DEFERRED |
| SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING |
| OFFICIAL. |
| 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.41 |
| COMPONENTS & CLADDING. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY |
| AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF |
| PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS. |
| (B) WINDOWS |
| (C) PANEL WALLS: STOREFRONTS, WALL LOUVERS, EFIS |
| SYSTEMS |
| (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES |
| (G) PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS |
| |
| 5) 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS |
| WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 SHALL BE |
| REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, |
| SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. |
| |
| 6) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 7) 2ND REQUEST. SHEET S4.0 ALSO HAS STATEMENTS FOR |
| SOILS REPORTS FOR ALL OF THE NEW FOUNDATIONS FOR THE |
| MEZZANINE LEVEL. THE ASSUMED SAFE BEARING VALUE OF THE |
| SOILS IS 2500 PSF. NOTE 3 READS: SOILS SUPPORTING ALL |
| FOOTING MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY A REGISETERD |
| SOILS ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. APPROVED IN |
| WRITING MUST INDICATE THE SOIL IS ADEQUATE TO SAFETLY |
| SUSTAIN SPECIFIED SOIL BEARING PRESSURE. 2010 FBC-B |
| 1803.2 INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 8) 2ND REQUEST. RESPONCE SEE DETAIL 11/A5.0, THIS |
| DETAIL IS FOR A BULKHEAD OR SOFFIT NOT A DROPPED |
| CEILING. SHEET A1.1 SHOWS A DROPPED CEILING OVER |
| EXPOSITION KITCHEN AND PICK UP AREA, PLEASE PROVIDE |
| DETAILS OF HOW THIS SYSTEM WILL BE ATTACHED TO THE |
| FRAMING SYSTEM ABOVE THE GIRDERS APPEAR TO BE SPACED |
| 10'-0" APART.107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS |
| REQUIRED. |
| |
| 9)COMPLIED> SHEET A1.1 CEILING PLAN THERE IS A SYMBOL T |
| THAT APPEARS NUMEROUS TIMES ON THE PLANS, THIS SYMBOL |
| IS NOT FOUND IN THE CEILING PLAN LEGEND. 107.2.1.3 |
| ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 10) 2ND REQUEST SHEET A1.0, A1.2 THE MAIN FLOOR PLAN |
| DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR THE PICK |
| UP AREA SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH 2010 FL ACCESS. CODE |
| 904.4. SALES AND SERVICE COUNTERS. SALES COUNTERS AND |
| SERVICE COUNTERS SHALL COMPLY WITH 904.4.1 OR 904.4.2. |
| THE ACCESSIBLE PORTION OF THE COUNTER TOP SHALL EXTEND |
| THE SAME DEPTH AS THE SALES OR SERVICE COUNTER TOP. |
| |
| 11) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 12) COMPLIED. |
| |
| |
| |
| JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| |