Date |
Text |
2014-12-28 12:48:53 | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| |
| THE OVERALL SCOPE OF WORK AND WHAT IS PROPOSED AS NEW |
| IS UNCLEAR. ACCORDINGLY THE VALUATION IS NOT PRESUMED |
| TO BE ACCURATE. PROVIDE A SCOPE OF WORK AND A COST |
| BREAKDOW IF THAT MAY BE HELPFUL. ADDITIONALLY, IT IS |
| UNCLEAR WHO THE MECHANICAL DESIGNER OF RECORD IS AND IF |
| THE DUCT SYSTEM, HAND DRAWN, ON SHEET A-1 IS NEW OR |
| EXISTING. IS THE ROOF COVERING TO BE REPLACED? IS THERE |
| AN ADDITION PROPOSED? PLAN INDICATES 1,152 SF RECORSD |
| SHOW EXISTING TOTAL UNDER AIR IS 720 SF. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| A SITE PLAN OR SURVEY. |
| |
| FBC 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. |
| CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE DIMENSIONED AND DRAWN |
| UPON SUITABLE MATERIAL. ELECTRONIC MEDIA DOCUMENTS |
| SHALL BE SUBMITTED WHEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING |
| OFFICIAL. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT |
| CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF |
| THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL |
| CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT |
| LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED |
| BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. SUCH DRAWINGS AND |
| SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM |
| OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, |
| WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE |
| TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC, |
| AND THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE |
| OR IN PART, NOR SHALL THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS |
| EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC |
| INFORMATION. ALL INFORMATION, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS |
| AND ACCOMPANYING DATA SHALL BEAR THE NAME AND SIGNATURE |
| OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN |
| |
| FBC-107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. ALL |
| INFORMATION, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCOMPANYING |
| DATA SHALL BEAR THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON |
| RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. (MECHANICAL PLAN) |
| |
| FBC 107.3.5.3 ? PROVIDE A SITE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE |
| SETBACKS AND BUILDING SEPARATION. |
| |
| ADDITIONALLY, IT SEEMS YOU ARE REPLACING SOME WINDOWS. |
| THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED HAS AN "OREIAL " & AN |
| "EQUAL SPLIT" OPTION, WHICH IS PROPOSED. NO PRODUCT WAS |
| SUBMITTED FOR THE MULLIONS. ADDITIONALLY, |
| |
| FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THOSE |
| PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY FAC RULE 9N-3 REVIEWED |
| AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| SPECIFICALLY, PROVIDE ROOFING,(IF APPLIABLE) & WINDOW |
| MULLION. |
| |
| THE ENERGY SUBMITTAL WILL BE EVALUATED UPON |
| RESUBMITTAL. |
| |
| STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO |
| CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER |
| (561) 805-6710 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |