Date |
Text |
2015-05-01 14:35:47 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| W. P. B. PERMIT: 14110863 |
| ADD: 5483 LEEPER DR. |
| CONT: ANDERSON MOORE CONSTRUCTION |
| TEL: (561) 662-1819 |
| E-MAIL: RKENNEY @AMCBUILD.COM |
| |
| 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W |
| * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA |
| BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION |
| 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. |
| |
| IMPORTANT NOTICE: EFFECTIVE MARCH 30, 2015 |
| ALL PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN REVIEWS WILL BE PERFORMED |
| ELECTRONICALLY |
| UPON APPLICATION AND FEE PAYMENT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| SUBMISSION OPTIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| 1 UPLOAD VIA THE PROJECT DOX PORTAL WITH DIGITAL |
| SIGNATURES OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AS APPLICABLE; USE |
| THE REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT |
| 2 INCLUDE ON A CD IF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DIGITAL |
| SIGNATURES ARE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED; USE THE REQUIRED |
| NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT |
| 3 INCLUDE ON A CD WITH ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER |
| DESIGN DOCUMENTS SIGNED AND SEALED AS REQUIRED; USE THE |
| REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT |
| 4 ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER DESIGN DOCUMENTS SUBJECT |
| TO ADMINISTRATIVE FEES TO DIGITIZE THE DOCUMENTS |
| ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED WHEN IT BECOMES |
| AVAILABLE |
| |
| 3RD REVIEW |
| DATE: FRIDAY MAY 01/2015 |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| 1-2 COMPLIED. |
| |
| 3) SEMI-COMPLIED. 3) THE TITLE SHEET LIST THE COMMON |
| PATH OF TRAVEL OF 28'-11"/ MAX. PROVIDED (50'). PLEASE |
| REFER TO SHEET LS.101 THE MEZZANINE LEVEL FROM THE |
| FURTHEST POINT ON THE MEZZANINE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE |
| STAIRS A MAXIMUM OF 100 FT. NOTE THIS IS IN A STRAIGHT |
| LINE, AS THE CROW FLIES. CHIEF LEDUC AS ASKED FOR A |
| LAYOUT OF THE MEZZANINE AREA RACKS OR BENS, WITH |
| FURNISHINGS THE TRAVEL DISTANCE WILL DIFFENTLY EXCEED |
| THE 100 FT REQUIRING A SECOND EXIT. 1015.2.1 TWO EXITS |
| OR EXIT ACCESS DOORWAYS. |
| |
| 4) COMPLIED. SOILS REPORTS SUBMITTED. |
| |
| 5) COMPLIED. RESIDENT INSPECTOR FORMS. |
| |
| 6) A) COMPLIED. SHEET S-3 DOES HAVE THE CORRECT WIND |
| DESIGN 170 MPH, EXPOSURE C, BLDG. CAT. II, MEAN ROOM |
| HEIGHT OF 34 FT. 8 1/4 INCHES, THE WALL PRESSURES IN |
| VASD WALL ZONES 4 & 5, ARE GOOD. |
| |
| 6B) PLEASE NOTE THE 2ND SUBMITTAL FROM NUCOR WITH THE |
| CORRECT WIND SPEED OF 170 VULT CONSIST OF SHEETS C1, F1 |
| & FD1. THE 1ST SUBMITTAL HAD 10 PAGES OF NUCOR PLANSFOR |
| THE MEZZANINE AND APPROXIMATELY 5/16 OF AN INCH WORTH |
| OF STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING. THESE PLANS ARE |
| MISSING FROM THE NEW 170 MPH PACKAGE. |
| DID THE GIRT AND PURLIN LOCATION CHANGE OR ARE THE (2) |
| PACKAGES TO BE RECONFIGURED INTO ONE PACKAGE? IS |
| ANDERSON-MOORE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RE-ORGANIZEING THIS |
| PAPERWORK? FOR THE REMAINDER OF THIS REVIEW I'M GOING |
| TO USE THE REMAINDER OF THE 180 MPH FOR GIRT AND PURLIN |
| SPACING TO COMPARE PRESSURES AND SPACING FOR CODE |
| COMPLIANCE. 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS |
| REQUIRED. |
| |
| 6C) NUCOR WALL PRODUCT APPROVAL FLORIDA REPORT FL |
| 2686-R3 REVERSE CLASSIC PANEL, PLEASE NOTE THERE ARE |
| (2) STRENGTH OF PANELS WITHIN THIS REPORT BOTH BEING 26 |
| GAUGE METAL PANELS. PLEASE IDENTIFY IF THE 50 KSI OR |
| THE 80 KSI ARE TO BE INSTALLED ON THIS PROJECT, THE |
| PRESURES ARE DIFFERENT FOR THE SAME SPANS. FOR THE |
| INTERIOR WALL ZONE 4, FOR (4) OR MORE SPANS @ 4 FT. |
| (BASED ON THE 180 MPH GIRT SPACING SHEETP3 OF 05) THE |
| REQIURED PRESSURE OF 44.76 VASD WILL WORK ON EITHER |
| CHART, BUT IN WALL ZONE 5 THE END ZONE, WITH THE GIRTS |
| SPACED 4 FT. O.C. THE REQUIRED PRESSURE OF 55.02 |
| NEITHER CHART MEETS THE REQUIRED PRESSURES, IN WALL |
| ZONE 5 THE GIRTS WILL NEED TO BE CLOSER TOGETHER TO |
| ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED PRESSURE OF 55.02 VASD AS ALLOWED |
| BY THE PRODUCT LIMITATIONS. THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR |
| THE REDUCED SUPPORT SPACING MAY BE COMPUTED USING |
| RATIONAL ANALYSIS PREPARED BY A FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL |
| ENGINEER OR BASED ON NUCOR'S LOAD SPAN TABLE. |
| |
| 6D) NUCOR ROOF PANEL PRODUCT APPROVAL FL4891-R-6 |
| CLASSIC PANEL HAS THE SAME (2) STRENGTH METALS, A 50KSI |
| & 80 KSI. PLEASE IDENTIFY WHICH PRODUCT IS GOING TO BE |
| INSTALLED ON THIS PROJECT. THE PRODUCT APPROVAL DOES |
| INDICATE THE 50 KSI STEEL HAS TO BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS. |
| IT WOULD APPEAR IF THIS PRODUCT IS TO BE INSTALLED THE |
| ENGINEER OF RECORD WILL NEED TO BE INVOLVED WITH THE |
| DESIGN. THE 80 KSI PRODUCT STATES THAT WITH SUPPORTING |
| PURLINS WITH SPACING OF 60.187 INCHES O. C. THE |
| PRESSURES ARE GOOD FOR 52.5. WITHIN THIS PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS THERE ARE NO SPAN TABLES PROVIDED. NUCORS ROF |
| SPANS BASED ON THE 180 MPH SHEET P3 OF 05 INDICATES |
| SPANS OF 4 FT. NUCORS STRUCTURAL DESIGN PAGGE A2 ROOF |
| PRESSURES ARE IN VULT. WHEN CONVERTED OVER TO VASD ROOF |
| ZONE PRESSURES OF ZONE # 1 -41.26, |
| ZONE # 2 -71.83 & ZONE # 3 -106.23. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| DOCUMENTATION THAT THIS PRODUCT WILL BE ABLE TO MEET |
| THESE PRESSURES. |
| |
| 6E) NUCOR BUILDING SYSTEMS IS AN ENGINEERED SYSTEM. FOR |
| THE FINAL SET OF PERMITTABLE DOCUMENTS ORIGINAL SIGHED |
| & SEALED DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED BY FLORIDA |
| ADMINISTRTIVE CODE. 61G15-23.002(2) FL. ADMIN. CODE. |
| PLANS SIGNED & SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL |
| INCLUDE EITHER THE: NAME, ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER OF |
| THE ENGINEER OR, THE NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE |
| ENGINEER AND THE NAME, ADDRESS AND CERTIFICATE OF |
| AUTHORIZATION NUMBER OF THE ENGINEERING BUSINESS |
| THROUGH WHICH THE ENGINEER IS PRACTICING (471.025 F.S. |
| AND 471.023 F.S.). |
| |
| 61G15-23.002(2) FL. ADMIN. CODE. A COVER SHEET OR INDEX |
| SHEET FOR ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS MAY BE USED AND |
| THAT SHEET MUST BE SIGNED IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF THE |
| PRODUCTION & PREPARATION OF EACH SECTION OF THE |
| ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION WITH SUFFICIENT INFORMATION |
| ON THE COVER SHEET OR INDEX. |
| |
| 61G15-30.003 ENGINEERING DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION. |
| ENGINEERS SHALL LEGIBLY INDICATE THEIR NAME AND |
| BUSINESS ADDRESS, ON ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. ENGINEERING |
| DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY OR |
| CONCEPTUAL USE, SHALL CLEARLY NOTE THE INTENDED PURPOSE |
| OF SUCH DOCUMENTS. WHEN ELEMENTS OF THE PROJECT ARE |
| SHOWN ON AN ENGINEERING DOCUMENT ONLY FOR INFORMATION |
| OR CLARIFICATION AND THE ENGINEER DOES NOT INTEND TO |
| ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ELEMENTS, THE ENGINEER |
| SHALL CLEARLY NOTE ON THE DOCUMENTS THE EXTENT OF HIS |
| RESPONSIBILITY. |
| SPECIFIC AUTHORITY 471.033(2), 471.008 FS. LAW |
| IMPLEMENTED 471.033(1)(G), 471.025(3) FS. HISTORY NEW |
| 1-26-93, FORMERLY 21H-30.003. |
| |
| 7A) SEMI-COMPLIED. THE SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR |
| WALL AND ROOF PANELS ARE NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS AS TO KSI. THEY ARE NOT IDENTIED BY CIRCLING |
| THE PRODUCTS TO BE USED ON THIS PROJECT ON THE NUCOR |
| DRAWINGS LABELED C1 OF 1. 2010 WEST PALM BEACH |
| AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, |
| ADMINISTRATION 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION |
| DOCUMENTS. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF |
| SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND |
| EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT |
| WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND |
| RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS |
| DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. SUCH DRAWINGS AND |
| SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM |
| OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, |
| WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE |
| TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC, |
| AND THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE |
| OR IN PART, NOR SHALL THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS |
| EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC |
| INFORMATION. |
| |
| 7B) COMPLIED, NUCOR HAS INDICATED THIS CLASSIC ROOF |
| PANEL IS NOT ALLOWED TO TAKE THE DOUBLE REDUCTION AS |
| ALLOWED BY THE 2010 FBC-B SECTION 2210.5 / AISI SECTION |
| D6.2.1A. |
| |
| 8) COMPLIED, SHEET S3 DOES HAVE THE CORRECT WIND DESIGN |
| 170 MPH, EXPOSURE C, BLDG. CAT. II, MEAN ROOM HEIGHT OF |
| 34 FT. 8 1/4 INCHES, THE WALL PRESSURES IN VASD WALL |
| ZONES 4 & 5, ARE GOOD. |
| |
| 9A) SEMI-COMPLIED. NUCOR WALL & ROOF PRODUCT APPRVALS |
| HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD BUT THE |
| VARIABLES ARE THERE, UNKNOWN IF THE 50 OR 80 KSI |
| PRODUCT WILL BE INSTALLED, PRESSURES MAYOR MAY NOT |
| WORK, ROOF SPAN CHART NOT AVAILABLE AS A REFERANCE. |
| 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON |
| CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE |
| AND EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT |
| IT WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND |
| RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS |
| DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. SUCH DRAWINGS AND |
| SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM |
| OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, |
| WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE |
| TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC, |
| AND THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE |
| OR IN PART, NOR SHALL THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS |
| EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC |
| INFORMATION. |
| |
| 9B) COMPLIANCE HAS NOT BEEN MET FOR COMPONENTS AND |
| CLADDING. 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS, |
| 1609.6.4.41 COMPONENTS & CLADDING |
| FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. |
| 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION |
| SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS. |
| (B) WINDOWS |
| (C) WALL LOUVERS RUSKIN WALL LOUVER SUBMITTED, NO FL |
| APPROVAL COVER SHEET NOR REVIEWED BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| RECORD. |
| IT WOULD APPEAR THAT NUCOR IS TAKING THE RESPONSIBILITY |
| FOR THEIR WALL AND ROOFING PRODUCCT APPROVALS AND THE |
| CONTRACTOR ANDERSON-MOORE WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE |
| EXTERIOR DOORS, WINDOWS AND WALL LOUVERS. SINCE SHEET |
| S-3 HAS GOOD DESIGNPRESSURES EITHER THE CONTRACTOR OR |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD CAN REQUEST IN WRITING FOR THESE |
| PRODUCTS TO BE SUBMITTED AS DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. |
| |
| 107.3.4.2 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS |
| SECTION, DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ARE DEFINED AS THOSE |
| PORTIONS OF THE DESIGN THAT ARE NOT SUBMITTED AT THE |
| TIME OF THE APPLICATION AND THAT ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO |
| THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD. |
| DEFERRAL OF ANY SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL HAVE THE PRIOR |
| APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE REGISTERED |
| DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHALL LIST |
| THE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS |
| FOR REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. DOCUMENTS FOR |
| DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE |
| REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE |
| WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD THEM TO THE BUILDING |
| OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED |
| SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE |
| IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. |
| THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED |
| UNTIL THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN |
| APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| |
| 10) 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE |
| PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 |
| SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, |
| SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. |
| |
| 11) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 12) THE ENERGY CODE TOTAL BUILDING PERFORMANCE: |
| 12A) 3RD REQUEST PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF CODE |
| COMPLIANCE. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR THE SHGC |
| VALUES TAKEN OF (0.50) UNDER THE TOTAL BUILDING |
| PERFORMANCE ENERGY 506.3.1. THE RESPONSE FROM AMC |
| STATES THE ACTUAL SHGC VALUE OF THE GLAZING IS 0.90 |
| WHICH EXCEEDS THE BASELINE. WHAT I'M ASKING YOU FOR IS |
| FOR PROOF THAT THESE WINDOWS MEET A SHGC COEFFIENT OF |
| 0.90. THE CALCULATED ENERGY CALCULATIONN IS TAKING |
| CREDIT FOR IT, PROVE IT! |
| |
| 12B-F) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 13) COMPLIED. IMPACT FEES. |
| 14) PROVISO: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| |
| THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT THAT APPLIES TO ANY REMODEL OR |
| NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT |
| APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED AFTER 7/1/14, AND THE TOTAL |
| PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN |
| $500,000. PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ORDINANCE NO. |
| 4504-14, AND CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF |
| ORDINANCES, ARTICLE V, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES, SECTION |
| 78-123(A) AND SECTION 78-126(A), THE ART ASSESSMENT IS |
| 1% OF THE TOTAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST. |
| |
| PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES, ARTICLE |
| V, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES, SECTION 78-122, RENOVATION AND |
| NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ARE ASSESSED CUMULATIVELY, SO |
| THE ART ASSESSMENT WILL BE APPLICABLE TO ALL FUTURE |
| PROJECTS. |
| |
| 15) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE |
| REVISION & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES |
| AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION |
| |
| JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE |
| HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |