Date |
Text |
2015-03-18 15:44:16 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| W. P. B. PERMIT: 14110863 |
| ADD: 5483 LEEPER DR. |
| CONT: ANDERSON MOORE CONSTRUCTION |
| TEL: (561) 662-1819 |
| E-MAIL: RKENNEY @AMCBUILD.COM |
| |
| 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W |
| * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA |
| BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION |
| 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. |
| |
| IMPORTANT NOTICE: EFFECTIVE MARCH 30, 2015 |
| ALL PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN REVIEWS WILL BE PERFORMED |
| ELECTRONICALLY |
| UPON APPLICATION AND FEE PAYMENT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| SUBMISSION OPTIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| 1 UPLOAD VIA THE PROJECT DOX PORTAL WITH DIGITAL |
| SIGNATURES OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AS APPLICABLE; USE |
| THE REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT |
| 2 INCLUDE ON A CD IF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DIGITAL |
| SIGNATURES ARE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED; USE THE REQUIRED |
| NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT |
| 3 INCLUDE ON A CD WITH ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER |
| DESIGN DOCUMENTS SIGNED AND SEALED AS REQUIRED; USE THE |
| REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT |
| 4 ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER DESIGN DOCUMENTS SUBJECT |
| TO ADMINISTRATIVE FEES TO DIGITIZE THE DOCUMENTS |
| ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED WHEN IT BECOMES |
| AVAILABLE |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW |
| DATE: WED. MARCH 18/2015 |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| 1-3) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 4) 2ND REQUEST . ONLY (1) SOILS REPORT WAS SUBMITTED, |
| NOTE THIS JOB REQUIRES A RESIDENT INSPECTOR REQUIRING |
| (3) SOILS REPORTS SIGNED AND SEALED. |
| 1ST REVIEW COMMENT. NO SOILS REPORT WAS SUBMITTED, |
| PLEASE PROVIDE A REPORT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH: 2010 FBC-B |
| 1803.5.2 QUESTIONABLE SOIL. |
| WHERE THE CLASSIFICATION, STRENGTH OR COMPRESSIBILITY |
| OF THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE |
| SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE |
| BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL BE PERMITTED TO REQUIRE THAT A |
| GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BE CONDUCTED. ALSO SEE |
| 1803.6 REPORTING. |
| |
| 5) THE NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A METAL/ STEEL FRAME |
| WAREHOUSE WITH WELDS AND BOLTABLE CONNECTIONS. THIS |
| JOBSITE QUALIFIES FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM. |
| |
| 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION,110.3.9 OTHER |
| INSPECTIONS SERVICES. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY MAKE, |
| OR CAUSE TO BE MADE BY OTHERS, THE INSPECTIONS REQUIRED |
| BY SECTION 109. HE/SHE MAY ACCEPT REPORTS OF INSPECTORS |
| OF RECOGNIZED INSPECTION SERVICES, PROVIDED THAT AFTER |
| INVESTIGATION HE/SHE IS SATISFIED AS TO THEIR |
| QUALIFICATIONS AND RELIABILITY. A CERTIFICATE CALLED |
| FOR BY ANY PROVISION OF THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT |
| BE BASED ON SUCH REPORTS UNLESS THE SAME ARE IN WRITING |
| AND CERTIFIED BY A RESPONSIBLE OFFICER OF SUCH SERVICE. |
| THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE THE OWNER TO EMPLOY |
| AN INSPECTION SERVICE IN THE FOLLOWING INSTANCES: |
| 5. FOR BUILDINGS WITH AREA GREATER THAN 20,000 SQUARE |
| FOOT |
| 7. FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR |
| METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION (WELDING AND BOLTABLE |
| CONNECTIONS. |
| |
| 5A) THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR FORMS WILL BE E-MAILED TO |
| CONTACT [email protected] PLEASE FILE OUT THE |
| RESIDENT INSPECTOR FORMS AND RETURN TO W.P.B. BUILDING |
| DEPARTMENT CARE OF JIM WITMER. |
| |
| FORMS RETURNED ARE MISSING THE ; |
| 5A)(1) CERTIFIED INSPECTION CO. NAME. SHEET # 4 |
| 5B((2) ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER SEAL & SIGNATURE. SHEET # |
| 5 |
| |
| 5B) FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PLEASE PROVIDE A RESUME' |
| OF INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECT. THE |
| RESUME' MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY ALL CERTIFICATES AS |
| SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE |
| WILL REVIEW THE RESUME'. AFTER THE RESUME' IS REVIEWED, |
| AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES |
| WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST |
| MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA. |
| CONTACT KEN CONRAD |
| TEL: 561-805-6666 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| 5C) THE CONTRACTOR WILL PRODUCE A JOB SUMMARY OR |
| HISTORY FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE |
| SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD BY E-MAIL. KEN CONRAD: |
| [email protected] |
| |
| 5D) NOTE FOR PAPER PLANS 3 SETS OF DOCUMENTS ARE |
| REQUIRED. FOR DIGITAL PLANS, AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE, THE |
| PERMIT LIBRARIAN WILL E-MAIL YOU, THE APPROVED AND |
| BATCH STAMPED PLANS SO YOU MAY PRINT YOUR PLANS, TWO |
| SETS OF PLANS WILL NEED TO BE PRINTED IN COLOR, (1) FOR |
| THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR, THE OTHER FOR THE MEP |
| INSPECTORS. |
| |
| 5E) PLEASE CALL THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH?S AUTOMATED |
| TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS LINE (561) 805-6700) FOR |
| IN-PROGRESS INSPECTIONS FOR AUDITING OF JOBSITE |
| INSPECTIONS. |
| |
| |
| |
| 6) 2ND REVIEW. SHEET S-3 DOES PROVIDE COMPONENTS AND |
| CLADDING PRESSURES FOR WALL ZONES 4 & 5 DESIGNED VULT |
| FOR 170 MPH/ 3 SECOND GUST, EXPOSURE C. PRESSURES ARE |
| GOOD FOR A 35 FT. MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. SHEET A-4.00 |
| INDICATES A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 38?-11? AND A EAVE |
| HEIGHT OF 34?-8?. BY DEFINITION OF MEAN ROOF HEIGHT WE |
| USE THE EAVE HEIGHT WHEN THE ROOF ANGLE OF LESS THAN OR |
| EQUAL TO 10 DEGRESS (ACTUAL DEGREES OF 9.74). THE MEAN |
| ROOF HEIGHT OF 34?-8? SHOULD BE USED. THE DESIGNER OF |
| RECORD IS DEFERRING THE COMPONENTS AND CLADDING |
| PRESSURES TO THE NUCOR METAL BUILDING ENGINEER . |
| |
| THE NUCOR BUILDING IS DESIGNED TO VULT TO 180 MPH, |
| EXPOSURE C AND A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 30 FT. (FROM |
| FLOOR) NOT THE 35 FT. (34?-8?) TAKEN FROM GRADE. THERE |
| IS A DIFFERENCE IN WIND SPEED DESIGN AND MEAN ROOF |
| HEIGHT. WITH THE MORE STRIKER WIND DESIGN THE |
| COMPONENTS AND CLADDING UNDER THE 170 WILL FAIL |
| ALLOWING THE BUILDING TO EITHER IMPLODE OR EXPLODE |
| DEPENDING ON THE WIND DIRECTION AND SIZE OF THE BREACH, |
| THE BUILDING WAS NOT DESIGNED AS A PARTIALLY OPEN |
| BUILDING. THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR |
| THE BUILDING, WHEN THE ENGINEERING IS DEFERRED THE TWO |
| ENGINEERS NEED TO COME TO A CONCLUSION AS TO WHICH |
| DESIGN THE BUILDING IS TO BE BUILT. |
| |
| COMMENTS FROM 1ST REVIEW. SHEET S-3.0 INDICATES DESIGN |
| CRITERIA FOR THE METAL STRUCTURAL PORTION OF THIS |
| BUILDING, UNDER THE 1ST REVIEW THERE WAS NO DOCUMENTS |
| SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. NOTE THERE IS NO MENTION TO THE |
| COMPONENTS AND CLADDING THAT DEALS WITH THE METAL SKIN |
| AS TO THEIR DESIGN CRITERIA? WILL THE WHOLE BUILDING BE |
| DESIGNED UNDER ASCE 7-10 OR WILL THERE BE OTHER DESIGN |
| CRITERIA FOR THE METAL FRAMING AND CLADDING OF THE |
| BUILDING. THE PLANS ARE INCOMPLETE; THERE ARE ALSO NO |
| MEZZANINE DETAILS, SHEET S-2.0 FOR BOTH THE FOUNDATION |
| AND MEZZANINE BOTH REFER TO THE METAL BUILDING |
| MANUFACTURER FOR THE ANCHOR BOLT LAYOUT. |
| |
| |
| 7) 2ND REQUEST. THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IS DEFERRING THE |
| ROOF PRESSURES AND WALL PANEL PRESSURES TO THE NUCOR |
| BUILDING ENGINEER. NUCOR PLANS DOES NOT PROVIDE |
| COMPONENT & CLADDING PRESSURES FOR ROOF ZONES NOR WALL |
| ZONES. THERE STRUCTURAL CALCULATION SHEET A2 DOES SHOW |
| VULT PRESSURES ( ASSUMED, CALCULATIONS DOES NOT STATE |
| VULT OR VASD ) FOR ZONES 1, 2, & 3, SHEET A4 WALL |
| PRESSURES FOR ZONES 4 & 5 AGAIN PRESSURES DO NOT STATE |
| IF THEY ARE VULT OR VASD. NOTES ON BOTH SHEETS INDICATE |
| AISI 2007 SPECIFICATIONS. IF THE NUCOR DESIGNERS ARE |
| GOING FOR THE DOUBLE REDUCTION IN ALLOWABLE PRESSURES, |
| THEY WILL NEED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH AISI 100-2007 |
| D6.2.1A(A-G). INDICATE IF PRESSURES ARE VULT OR VASD |
| AND IF THE REDUCTIONS ALLOWED BY AISI 100-2007 WERE |
| TAKEN. |
| |
| WITHIN THE NUCOR PLANS SUBMITTED THERE ARE NO SECTIONS |
| CIRCLED SHOWING WHICH APPLICATIONS WILL BE APPLICABLE |
| TO THIS JOB. |
| |
| NOTE THE NUCOR PLANS C1OF 1 LIST VARIOUS FLORIDA STATE |
| APPROVALS NONE HAVE BEEN CIRCLED. THERE ALSO WERE NO |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED FOR EITHER THE WALL PANELS |
| OR ROOF PANELS. |
| |
| PLEASE ALSO SEE THE DESIGNER OF RECORDS COMMENTS AS TO |
| THE DEFICIENCIES FOUND IN THE NUCOR BUILDING SYSTEM |
| PLANS. |
| |
| COMMENT 1ST REVIEW. SHEET S-3.0 MISSING THE ROOF |
| PRESSURES FOR THE COMPONENTS AND CLADDING. PROVIDE THE |
| MEAN ROOF HEIGHT THE PRESSURES WILL BE TAKEN AT. ALSO |
| TAKE THE PRESSURES UNDER COMPONENTS AND CLADDING FOR 10 |
| SQ FT. 107.2.1.2 FOR ROOF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED BY THE |
| CODE, THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL |
| ILLUSTRATE, DESCRIBE AND DELINEATE THE TYPE OF ROOFING |
| SYSTEM, MATERIALS, FASTENING REQUIREMENTS, FLASHING |
| REQUIREMENTS AND WIND RESISTANCE RATING THAT ARE |
| REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED. PRODUCT EVALUATION AND |
| INSTALLATION SHALL INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE WIND |
| CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR THE SPECIFIC SITE OR A STATEMENT |
| BY AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER FOR THE SPECIFIC SITE MUST |
| BE SUBMITTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. |
| |
| 8) SEMI- COMPLIED, THE PRESSURES PROVIDED ARE GOOD FOR |
| A 170 VASD / 35 FT MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. WILL NEED TO |
| DISCUSS WITH NUCOR TO SEE WHICH OF THE DESIGN |
| PARAMETERS WILL BE USED FOR THE WHOLE OF THE BUILDING. |
| |
| 9) UNABLE TO DETERMINE PRESSURES UNTIL THE WIND DESIGN |
| CRITERIA IS DETERMINED BETWEEN THE DESIGNER OF RECORD |
| AND NUCORS ENGINEER. 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF |
| OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.41 COMPONENTS & CLADDING. FLORIDA |
| DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. 01/ 2010 |
| (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS |
| THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS. |
| (B) WINDOWS |
| (C) PANEL WALLS: STOREFRONTS, WALL LOUVERS, |
| (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES |
| |
| 10) 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE |
| PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 |
| SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, |
| SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. |
| |
| 11) COMPLIED |
| |
| 12) THE ENERGY CODE TOTAL BUILDING PERFORMANCE: |
| 12A) 2ND REQUEST PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF CODE |
| COMPLIANCE. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR THE SHGC |
| VALUES TAKEN OF (0.50) UNDER THE TOTAL BUILDING |
| PERFORMANCE ENERGY 506.3.1. |
| |
| 12B-F) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 13) COMPLIED. IMPACT FEES. |
| |
| 14) NEW COMMENT: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| |
| THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT THAT APPLIES TO ANY REMODEL OR |
| NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT |
| APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED AFTER 7/1/14, AND THE TOTAL |
| PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN |
| $500,000. PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ORDINANCE NO. |
| 4504-14, AND CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF |
| ORDINANCES, ARTICLE V, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES, SECTION |
| 78-123(A) AND SECTION 78-126(A), THE ART ASSESSMENT IS |
| 1% OF THE TOTAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST. |
| |
| PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES, ARTICLE |
| V, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES, SECTION 78-122, RENOVATION AND |
| NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ARE ASSESSED CUMULATIVELY, SO |
| THE ART ASSESSMENT WILL BE APPLICABLE TO ALL FUTURE |
| PROJECTS. |
| |
| 15) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE |
| REVISION & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES |
| AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| COOPERATION. |
| |
| A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A |
| RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED |
| ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF |
| THIS REVIEW. |
| |
| JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |