Date |
Text |
2014-10-17 11:13:25 | WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC.107.2.1.4. - |
| 1) PLANS SHALL BE DRAWN TO A MINIMUM 1/8 INCH SCALE. |
| THESE PLANS WOULD ALSO BE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND |
| SEALED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PER FL. |
| ADMIN. CODE RULE 61G15-23.002. |
| 2) THE DESCRIPTION OF WORK ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION |
| STATES "GREASE TRAP B - GREASE TRAP FOR A RESTAURANT" |
| YET THE SUBMITTED SITE PLANS SHOW ONE GREASE TRAP FOR |
| "B" AND ANOTHER PLAN WITH THREE GREASE TRAPS FOR "A", |
| "B" AND "C". WHICH IS IT, A, B OR C ? CLARIFY. CLEARLY |
| WRITE THE FULL DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK ON THE PERMIT |
| APPLICATION. |
| 3) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF ALL PLANS/ DOCUMENTS FOR THIS |
| PERMIT PER WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC.107.1. COMPILE |
| ALL DOCUMENTS INTO 2 SETS STAPLED TOGETHER. |
| 4) TWO DIFFERENT DESIGNS FOR THE 750 GAL. CONCRETE |
| VAULT TANKS HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. YOU MUST IDENTIFY WHICH |
| DESIGN WILL BE USED.THE DESIGN FROM US CONCRETE |
| PRODUCTS DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SEC. 1003.5.2 & 1003.5.3 |
| OF THE 2010 FPC. |
| 5) YOU HAVE SUBMITTED GREASE INTERCEPTOR SIZING |
| CALCULATIONS FROM THE 2010 FPC FOR CONCRETE VAULT TYPE |
| GREASE INTERCEPTOR FOR THE CAN WASH AND ALSO FOR A |
| SCHIER INTERCEPTOR. WHICH ONE ARE YOU USING? |
| 6) YOU HAVE SUBMITTED GREASE INTERCEPTOR SIZING |
| CALCULATIONS FOR RESTAURANTS AND ALSO FOR OTHER |
| ESTABLISHMENTS WITH COMMERCIAL KITCHENS. WHICH ONE IS |
| IT? |
| I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT DOCUMENTS YOU ARE ATTEMPTING TO USE |
| FOR THIS PERMIT SINCE THIS SUBMITTAL IS VAGUE AND |
| CONFUSING WITH THE CONFLICTING DOCUMENTS.WHEN |
| RESUBMITTING, ENSURE THAT ALL APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS ARE |
| ARRANGED IN TWO SETS WITH ALL INFORMATION CLEAR ENOUGH |
| FOR A COMPLETE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW. |
| |
| PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW |
| TIM LARGE |
| CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR |
| 561-805-6692 |
| [email protected] |
| |