Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 14100259
Permit Number 14100259
Review Stop P
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2014-10-17 11:13:25WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC.107.2.1.4. -
 1) PLANS SHALL BE DRAWN TO A MINIMUM 1/8 INCH SCALE.
 THESE PLANS WOULD ALSO BE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND
 SEALED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PER FL.
 ADMIN. CODE RULE 61G15-23.002.
 2) THE DESCRIPTION OF WORK ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION
 STATES "GREASE TRAP B - GREASE TRAP FOR A RESTAURANT"
 YET THE SUBMITTED SITE PLANS SHOW ONE GREASE TRAP FOR
 "B" AND ANOTHER PLAN WITH THREE GREASE TRAPS FOR "A",
 "B" AND "C". WHICH IS IT, A, B OR C ? CLARIFY. CLEARLY
 WRITE THE FULL DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK ON THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION.
 3) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF ALL PLANS/ DOCUMENTS FOR THIS
 PERMIT PER WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC.107.1. COMPILE
 ALL DOCUMENTS INTO 2 SETS STAPLED TOGETHER.
 4) TWO DIFFERENT DESIGNS FOR THE 750 GAL. CONCRETE
 VAULT TANKS HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. YOU MUST IDENTIFY WHICH
 DESIGN WILL BE USED.THE DESIGN FROM US CONCRETE
 PRODUCTS DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SEC. 1003.5.2 & 1003.5.3
 OF THE 2010 FPC.
 5) YOU HAVE SUBMITTED GREASE INTERCEPTOR SIZING
 CALCULATIONS FROM THE 2010 FPC FOR CONCRETE VAULT TYPE
 GREASE INTERCEPTOR FOR THE CAN WASH AND ALSO FOR A
 SCHIER INTERCEPTOR. WHICH ONE ARE YOU USING?
 6) YOU HAVE SUBMITTED GREASE INTERCEPTOR SIZING
 CALCULATIONS FOR RESTAURANTS AND ALSO FOR OTHER
 ESTABLISHMENTS WITH COMMERCIAL KITCHENS. WHICH ONE IS
 IT?
 I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT DOCUMENTS YOU ARE ATTEMPTING TO USE
 FOR THIS PERMIT SINCE THIS SUBMITTAL IS VAGUE AND
 CONFUSING WITH THE CONFLICTING DOCUMENTS.WHEN
 RESUBMITTING, ENSURE THAT ALL APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS ARE
 ARRANGED IN TWO SETS WITH ALL INFORMATION CLEAR ENOUGH
 FOR A COMPLETE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW.
  
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW
 TIM LARGE
 CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR
 561-805-6692
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved