| Plan Review Notes For Permit 14090353 |
| Permit Number |
14090353 |
|
| Review Stop |
B |
| Sequence Number |
1 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2014-10-14 18:30:20 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. FASTENING PROPOSED SHOULD BE SPECIFIC: FASTENER | | | TYPE, LENGTH OR MINIMUM EMBEDMENT, DIAMETER, MINIMUM | | | NUMBER, FBC 1609. REVISE PLAN TO BE LESS VAGUE - | | | "1/4-20 THROUGH BOLT APPROPRIATE FOR WEIGHT AND | | | SURFACE." | | | | | | ALTHOUGH A THROUGH BOLT WAS SPECIFIED, GRAPHICALLY IT | | | WAS NOT SHOWN AS EXTENDING THROUGH THE ENTIRE | | | SUBSTRATE, SO THE BOLT WOULD THEREFORE REQUIRE A | | | LENGTH. | | | | | | WHAT DOES "APPROPRIATE FOR WEIGHT AND SURFACE" MEAN? | | | SHOULDN'T THE ENGINEER SPECIFY THE FASTENER BASED ON | | | JOB CONDITIONS? THIS ENGINEER'S PLANS ARE NOT NORMALLY | | | THIS VAGUE. | | | | | | ALTERNATES (SCREWS, TOGGLE BOLTS) DID NOT INCLUDE | | | LENGTH. | | | | | | REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE REQUESTED INFORMATION. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
