Date |
Text |
2015-06-13 11:59:46 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION, FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW |
| COMMENTS. |
| CODE: 2010 FBC |
| |
| 1- NEW FIRST FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET S-1: INFORMATION ADDED |
| BY THE STAIRWAY IS NOT LEGIBLE. LETTERING IS TOO SMALL. |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1.4 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 2- SHEET S-2: |
| A) COLUMN BASE CONNECTOR LCB66 SPECIFIED FOR LVL BEAMS |
| DOESN'T WORK. SIZE OF BEAM IS BIGGER THAN THE W1 |
| DIMENSION OF THE CONNECTOR. ENGINEER TO SPECIFY |
| PROPOSED SIZE OF CONNECTOR. ENGINEER TO SPECIFY THE |
| UPLIFT LOADS AT THE ENDS OF EACH BEAM AND PROVIDE |
| COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS SHOWING HOW THE SPECIFIED |
| CONNECTOR IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE INSTALLATION. SEC. |
| 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| B) CONNECTOR "B" SPECIFIED ON THE CONNECTOR SCHEDULE |
| DOESN'T MATCH PROPOSED INSTALLATION AND IS INCOMPLETE. |
| PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL THAT MATCHES PROPOSED |
| INSTALLATION AND PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL AND |
| SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED STEEL CONNECTOR. SEC. |
| R301.1 CITY AMENDMENTS AND SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| C) DETAIL C/S2 STAIR WALL DETAIL: PROVIDE COMPLETE AND |
| CLEAR DETAIL OF THE STEEL BRACKET. SPECIFY ALL |
| DIMENSIONS. PROVIDE DETAIL THAT MATCHES PROPOSED |
| INSTALLATION. ALSO, COORDINATE WITH CONNECTOR "C". |
| ELEVATION VIEW OF CONNECTOR "C" DOESN'T SHOW HOW IS THE |
| STEEL BRACKET ATTACHED TO THE CONCRETE BEAM. SEC. |
| R301.1 AND SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| D) PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR THE PRE-CAST LINTELS SPECIFIED ON |
| DETAIL C/S2 STAIR WALL DETAIL. |
| |
| E) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| CONNECTOR OF THE WOOD POST SHOWN ON DETAIL C/S2 STAIR |
| WALL DETAIL. SEC. R301.1 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| F) PROVIDE GUARDRAIL COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION AND |
| INSTALLATION DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING |
| COMPLIANCE WITH THE LIVE LOADS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 |
| AND SEC. R312 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PROVIDE |
| ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW THE SPECIFIED POST |
| CONNECTOR AND THE TOE NAILED #12 SCREWS AS SHOWN ON |
| DETAIL A/S2 WILL RESIST THE REQUIRED LOADS. SEC. |
| 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. AND, PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE NAILING OF THE RAILING PICKETS. |
| |
| G) ALL THE STAIRS INFORMATION IS MISSING. PROVIDE |
| COMPLETE INFORMATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. |
| R311.7.4 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| H) PROVIDE COMPLETE FASTENING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| INSTALLATION OF THE 1 X 6 WOOD DECKING AND 1 X 6 |
| CYPRESS CEILING. SEC. R301 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| I) CLARIFY IF DECK IS GOING TO BE DESIGNED WITHOUT |
| WATERPROOFING. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. OTHERWISE, |
| PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION INCLUDING PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| AND SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS IF REQUIRED. |
| DCA RULE 9N-3. |
| |
| J) IT'S NOT CLEAR WHY SUBMITTING PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR |
| SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS, WINDOW MULLIONS. THE PLANS DON'T |
| SHOW ANY SCOPE OF WORK OF NEW WINDOWS OR WINDOW |
| REPLACEMENT. IF THERE IS GOING TO BE WINDOW |
| REPLACEMENT, THEN REVISE PLANS AS REQUIRED SHOWING |
| AREAS OF WORK. SPECIFY SIZE SIZE AND TYPE OF EXISTING |
| WINDOWS AND PROPOSED WINDOWS. SEC. 604 OF 2010 |
| FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. REVISE VALUATION DECLARED IN THE |
| PERMIT APPLICATION ACCORDINGLY. REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| 3- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND DESIGN |
| PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS TO FBC. PROVIDE COPY OF SIGNED CONTRACT. |
| |
| |
| *** PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.... |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |