Date |
Text |
2014-09-08 17:30:56 | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS |
| |
| 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| (561) 805-6714 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| |
| MECHANICAL |
| |
| 1) THE ENERGY FORM 402-2010 THAT WAS SUBMITTED APPEARS |
| TO CONTAIN SO ERRORS. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| - THE CONDITIONED AREA IS LISTED AS 1040 SQFT AND THE |
| CEILING AREA IS LISTED AS 537 SQFT. |
| - THE AIR HANDLER UNIT LOCATION IS SPECIFIED AS THE |
| GARAGE. THIS PLANS SHOWS THE UNIT IN A HALL CLOSET. THE |
| PLAN DOES NOT SHOW A GARAGE. |
| - THE SEER IS LISTED AS 16 ON THE FORM AND THE AHRI |
| CERTIFICATION THAT WAS SUBMITTED HAS A SEER RATING OF |
| 13. |
| |
| 2) THE EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS SPECIFY THE TOTAL |
| COOLING REQUIRED IS 27,082 BTUH OR 2.26 TONS. THE A/C |
| CHANGE OUT FORM AND THE AHRI CERTIFICATION FORM ARE FOR |
| A 3 TON SYSTEM. BASED ON THE SIZING CALCULATIONS AND |
| FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION SEC. 403.6.1.1, THE MAXIMUM |
| COOLING EQUIPMENT SIZE IS |
| 403.6.1.1 COOLING EQUIPMENT CAPACITY. |
| COOLING ONLY EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SELECTED SO THAT ITS |
| TOTAL CAPACITY IS NOT LESS THAN THE CALCULATED TOTAL |
| LOAD BUT NOT MORE THAN 1.15 TIMES GREATER THAN THE |
| TOTAL LOAD CALCULATED ACCORDING TO THE PROCEDURE |
| SELECTED IN SECTION 403.6, OR THE CLOSEST AVAILABLE |
| SIZE PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER?S PRODUCT LINES. THE |
| CORRESPONDING LATENT CAPACITY OF THE EQUIPMENT SHALL |
| NOT BE LESS THAN THE CALCULATED LATENT LOAD. |
| |
| IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIMES, PLEASE SUBMIT A |
| RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW |
| COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |