| Date |
Text |
| 2016-03-24 17:30:22 | 3RD REVIEW: FBC 2010 MECHANICAL |
| | PERMIT #14061217 |
| | 3/24/16 |
| | |
| | 1) THE REQUESTED RATIONAL ANALYSIS FOR THE SMOKE |
| | CONTROL SYSTEM WAS NOT SUBMITTED- REFER TO SECTION |
| | 513.4 FBC-10 MECHANICAL. THE REVISED PLANS ARE NOT |
| | PROVIDING SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO VERIFY THE SYSTEM |
| | IS COMPLIANT WITH THE CODES. THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL |
| | SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE THAT CLEARLY DEMONSTRATES THE |
| | SYSTEM DESIGN, AND ALL EQUIPMENT AND COMPONENTS |
| | SPECIFIED ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 513.4.1- |
| | 513.4.6 FBC-10 MECHANICAL. PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL |
| | SUBMITTALS FOR EQUIPMENT AND COMPONENTS OF THE SMOKE |
| | CONTROL SYSTEM- FANS, DUCTWORK, FIRE ALARM DEVICES AND |
| | CONTROLS, FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS, GENERATOR, MOTORIZED AND |
| | BAROMETRIC DAMPERS ETC. SHALL BEAR THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD'S SIGNATURE OF APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET M602: BUILDING PRESSURIZATION- CONTROL |
| | SEQUENCE: TWO DIFFERENT EMERGENCY OPERATION PROCEDURES |
| | ARE SHOWN DEPENDING ON HOW THE FIRE ALARM IS ACTIVATED- |
| | BY FLOW SWITCH, OR BY SMOKE DETECTORS. IN THE FIRST |
| | SEQUENCE (FLOW SWITCH) THE FSD'S ARE TO REMAIN OPEN ON |
| | THE FIRE FLOOR PRESSURIZING BOTH THE CORRIDORS AND THE |
| | GUEST ROOMS, BUT IN THE SECOND SEQUENCE (SMOKE |
| | DETECTORS), THE CONTROL SEQUENCE INDICATES THAT ALL |
| | FSD'S ON FIRE FLOOR WILL CLOSE TO PREVENT SMOKE |
| | MIGRATION INTO THE GUESTROOMS. THERE APPEARS TO BE A |
| | CONFLICT HERE, AND THE STATEMENT IS CONFUSING BECAUSE |
| | FSD'S ARE SHOWN FOR BOTH RTU-1 (GUEST ROOMS) AND RTU-2 |
| | (CORRIDORS) AT THE RATED SHAFTS ON EACH FLOOR |
| | (M103-M201). ARE WE TALKING ABOUT JUST CLOSING THE FSD |
| | FOR RTU-1 OR RTU-2 AS WELL WHICH WOULD BE MORE TYPICAL? |
| | ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE CLARIFY WHY FIRE DAMPERS (FD'S) |
| | ARE INDICATED AT THE O/A DUCT PENETRATIONS INTO THE |
| | GUESTROOMS. WOULD THESE NOT BE REDUNDANT IF THERE IS AN |
| | FSD AT THE SHAFT? PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THESE DAMPERS ARE |
| | TO BE PART OF THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM THEN THEY SHALL |
| | BE CHANGED TO FSD'S IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 715.4.3 |
| | & 715.4.3.1 FBC-10 BUILDING. PLEASE CLARIFY HOW SMOKE |
| | WOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE FLOOR OF FIRE ORIGIN USING |
| | THIS DESIGN. WOULD THE SYSTEM FUNCTION MORE EFFECTIVELY |
| | IF SMOKE EVACUATION ON THE FLOOR OF ORIGIN WAS |
| | INCLUDED? |
| | |
| | 3) IT APPEARS THAT THE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS |
| | ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE NARRATIVE SUBMITTED BY CLAD |
| | WHICH INDICATES THAT ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAVE BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED AND PLANS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED. THOSE COMMENTS |
| | FROM THE 2ND REVIEW ARE ITEMIZED BELOW ALONG WITH SOME |
| | ADDITIONAL COMPLIANCE NOTES. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #1: A) CALCULATIONS FOR ZONES #4 & 5A WERE NOT |
| | SUBMITTED. B) ZONE #7 CALCULATIONS APPEAR TO BE FOR THE |
| | FLEX SPACES ONLY AND DO NOT INCLUDE THE TOILET, |
| | JANITOR, AND STORAGE ROOMS SERVICED BY AC R1. C) |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR THE HOTEL ROOMS ON ALL FLOORS NOT |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #2: THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN |
| | CORRECTED OR REVISED AS INDICATED IN THE NARRATIVE: THE |
| | ORIGINAL FORM HAS BEEN RE-SUBMITTED. PLEASE CORRECT THE |
| | CALCULATIONS SO THE DATA FOR THE SYSTEMS MATCHES THE |
| | SYSTEMS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS AND EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #3: SHEETS M101, M102, & M103: CORRIDORS SHALL |
| | NOT SERVE AS RETURN AIR DUCTS. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #4: M101: FIRE DAMPERS ARE STILL NOT SHOWN AT |
| | DUCT PENETRATIONS OF THE SECURITY/HR & OFFICE/VALET |
| | COMMON WALLS. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #5, M101: REQUIRED TRASH ROOM EXHAUST SYSTEM |
| | NOT ADDED TO THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | **ADVISORY** PLEASE REVIEW SECTION 501.2.1 FOR LOCATION |
| | OF, AND REQUIRED CLEARANCE DISTANCES FOR THE TRASH ROOM |
| | EXHAUST OUTLET, AND ALL OTHER EXHAUST OUTLETS ON THE |
| | EXTERIOR WALLS AND ROOFS OF THE BUILDING- PROVIDE |
| | DETAILS AND NOTES TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE. ADDITIONALLY, |
| | SEE SECTION 401.4 FOR ALL AIR INTAKE LOCATIONS AND |
| | CLEARANCE DISTANCES AT EXTERIOR WALLS AND ROOFS- |
| | PROVIDE DETAILS AND NOTES TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #6, M102: SEE ADVISORY NOTE ABOVE IN REGARD TO |
| | THE EXHAUST OUTLETS AND AIR INTAKES ON THE EXTERIOR |
| | WALLS OF THE GENERATOR, FIRE PUMP, AND BOILER ROOMS. A) |
| | PROVIDE MAKE-UP AIR FOR THE BOILER AND FIRE PUMP ROOM |
| | EXHAUST SYSTEMS. B) PROVIDE VENT PIPING DETAILS FOR THE |
| | GENERATOR INCLUDING TYPE AND SIZE OF VENT PIPE AND |
| | TERMINATION LOCATION. C) CLARIFY IF A FUEL TANK WILL BE |
| | LOCATED IN THE GENERATOR ROOM AND PROVIDE |
| | SPECIFICATIONS IF APPLICABLE. D) PROVIDE AN EQUIPMENT |
| | SCHEDULE LISTING ALL THE MAKES AND MODELS AND SIZES OF |
| | AIR INTAKE AND EXHAUST LOUVERS. PLEASE NOTE THE |
| | MIAMI-DADE NOA'S OR FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVALS MUST BE |
| | SUBMITTED FOR THE LOUVERS AS PART OF THE SUBMITTAL |
| | PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #8, M102: THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS AND FAN SIZING |
| | FOR THE GENERATOR AND FIRE PUMP ROOMS APPEAR TO HAVE |
| | BEEN CALCULATED USING THE METHOD USED FOR PARKING |
| | GARAGES. PLEASE SEE SECTION 4.1.2.1.3 NFPA 37-2010. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, THE EXHAUST DETAILS AND RISERS REFERENCED |
| | IN THE CALCULATIONS ARE NOT IN THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #9, M102- CALCULATIONS AND MAKE-UP AIR FOR THE |
| | BOILER ROOM EXHAUST HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE |
| | THAT AN EXHAUST SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THE LOCKER ROOM |
| | SHOWN ON THE PLAN- SEE TABLE 403.3 AND REVISE THE PLAN |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #10: OPERATIONAL SEQUENCE FOR MOTORIZED O/A AIR |
| | DAMPERS ON THE 1ST, 2ND, 3RD, AND 4TH FLOORS NOT |
| | PROVIDED AS REQUESTED. PLEASE SEE SECTION 503.2.5.4 |
| | FBC-10 ENERGY CONSERVATION AND SHOW COMPLIANCE. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE A PRODUCT SUBMITTAL REVIEWED BY THE EOR THAT |
| | MEETS COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 503.2.5.4.1 WHICH |
| | REQUIRES THE DAMPER TO BE CLASS 1 LEAKAGE-RATED. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #11: SEE ADVISORY PRINTED ABOVE. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #12, M103: NUMEROUS FD'S OR FSD'S STILL MISSING |
| | AND ONE FLEX DUCT IS STILL SHOWN PENETRATING THE RATED |
| | CORRIDOR WALLS BY THE CORRIDOR 229/ICE MACHINE ALCOVE. |
| | A) DAMPERS MISSING AT: GRILL IN F&B DIRECTOR/SERVICE |
| | CORRIDOR WALL, EXHAUST DUCT PENETRATING MECH |
| | 231/CORRIDOR 232 WALL, AND ALL TOILET EXHAUST DUCTS |
| | PENETRATING CORRIDOR WALLS. PLEASE NOTE A FIRESTOPPING |
| | DETAIL WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PRESSURIZATION DUCTS |
| | FROM RTU'S 1 & 2 PENETRATING THE RATED 2ND FLOOR |
| | FLOOR/CEILINGS. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #13, M1101-108, 201: REFRIGERANT PIPING CHASES |
| | AND RUNS NOT SHOWN. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #14: REFER TO 3RD REVIEW COMMENT #2 PRINTED |
| | ABOVE REGARDING FSD LOCATIONS AND SYMBOLS. ACCESS TO |
| | FIRE DAMPERS AND ACCESS PANEL DETAIL STILL EXISTS. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #15, M104: FIRE DAMPER MISSING FOR 24X8 DUCT |
| | PENETRATING THE ELEVATOR LOBBY/CORRIDOR WALL, AND |
| | EXHAUST DUCT PENETRATING THE CORRIDOR/STORAGE & |
| | CORRIDOR/WOMEN'S TOILET COMMON WALLS. |
| | |
| | **ADVISORY** M104: IN REGARD TO THE FUTURE GREASE DUCT |
| | RUNNING THOUGH THE FUTURE KITCHEN TO THE RATED CHASE, |
| | PLEASE REFER TO SECTION 506.3.7 FOR DUCT LENGTHS AND |
| | SLOPES, AND 506.3.8.2. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #16, M107: DAMPERS FOR DUCTS PENETRATING RATED |
| | FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES NOT SHOWN, AND FIRE DAMPER AND |
| | FIRESTOPPING DETAILS NOT PROVIDED. THE SUBMITTED |
| | RESPONSE NARRATIVE INDICATES FLAMEBAR DUCT IS TO BE |
| | USED BUT IT IS NOT NOTED ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #18, M107: THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE POOL |
| | EQUIPMENT WERE DONE USING A CALCULATION METHOD FOR |
| | PARKING GARAGES USING CO SENSORS. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | CALCULATIONS AND A SYSTEM THAT WILL OPERATE BASED ON |
| | THE TYPE OF PROCESSES AND CHEMICALS TO BE USED AND |
| | STORED IN THE ROOM. |
| | |
| | **ADVISORY** M108: A) GUARDS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR |
| | SERVICEABLE EQUIPMENT ALONG THE ROOF EDGES OF STAIR |
| | TOWER #2 IF THE PARAPET DOES NOT EXTEND 42" ABOVE THE |
| | ROOF SERVICE. B) THE GREASE DUCT TERMINATION IS WITHIN |
| | 10' OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTY LINE- REFER TO SECTION |
| | 506.3.12.3 AND INDICATE COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #19, M302 & M303: PRODUCT CUT SHEETS AND NOA'S |
| | FOR MECHANICAL CURBS, STANDS, AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED WITH SIGNATURE BY THE EOR. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #20, M502: CALCULATIONS FOR THE MEZZANINE |
| | LOUNGE, THE DIRTY LINENS ROOM, AND THE GUEST ROOMS NOT |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #21, M502: REQUESTED AIR BALANCE CALCULATIONS |
| | NOT PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #22, M602: REFER TO 3RD REVIEW COMMENTS #1 & 2 |
| | PRINTED ABOVE. |
| | |
| | COMMENT #23: PROVIDE THE REQUESTED SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET M201: PROVIDE A SEQUENCE OF OPERATION FOR THE |
| | SMOKE DETECTORS IN THE GUEST ROOMS AND PROVIDE A |
| | SUBMITTAL FOR THE DEVICES APPROVED WITH SIGNATURE BY |
| | THE EOR. |
| | |
| | 5) M201: LABEL THE ABOVE CEILING PLENUM SPACES AND |
| | PROVIDE NOTES AND DETAILS FOR CONSTRUCTION IN |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 602. |
| | |
| | 6) M301: DUCT HANGING, REINFORCEMENT AND CONNECTION |
| | DETAILS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SMACNA HVAC DUCT |
| | CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. PLEASE REVIEW THE DETAILS ON |
| | THE SHEET TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE AND LIST THE STANDARD IN |
| | THE PROJECT DESIGN CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 7) M501 & M503: REVISE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO |
| | INCLUDE ALL THE COMPLIANCE DATA LISTED IN THE AC |
| | SCHEDULES. |
| | |
| | 8) M503: INDICATE THE MANUFACTURER OF THE VRF SYSTEMS |
| | ON THE PLAN AND SUBMIT PRODUCT DATA SHEETS REVIEWED |
| | WITH SIGNATURE BY THE EOR. SHOW ON THE PLANS THE |
| | LOCATIONS OF THE CONTROL BOXES FOR THE SYSTEMS (LABELED |
| | AS BS IN SCHEDULES AND RISERS). |
| | |
| | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE |
| | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6719 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
