| Date |
Text |
| 2014-07-15 14:02:34 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATIONS, BUILDING REVIEW SECOND |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1- ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO HAVE THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF |
| | THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | |
| | **** RESPONSE TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED. |
| | NOT ALL DRAWINGS HAVE THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE |
| | PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. RESUBMIT ALL |
| | DRAWINGS WITH THE DESIGNER'S NAME AND SIGNATURE. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) EXTERIOR DOORS. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED |
| | FROM JELD WEN. DRAWINGS SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE ANY |
| | REFERENCE TO THE APPROVED FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | UNABLE TO VERIFY IF IT WAS APPROVED OR NOT. |
| | |
| | ****RESPONSE TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: |
| | |
| | REPORT NO 2031 SUBMITTED DOESN'T HAVE A FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL NUMBER. ALL THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE |
| | A NUMBER. THIS REPORT NEEDS NEEDS THE FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL NUMBER IN ORDER TO VERIFY STATUS. PROVIDE THE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER THAT CORRESPONDS TO |
| | THIS DOOR REPORT. IF THERE IS NOT FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL NUMBER, THEN, DOOR MANUFACTURER MAY APPLY FOR |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL BY SUBMITTING ALL THE REQUIRED |
| | DOCUMENTATION TO THE LOCAL BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 3- WINDOW AND DOOR REPLACEMENT DRAWINGS SUBMITTED: |
| | A) SHEET 3.0: SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING BEDROOM |
| | WINDOW #2 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 604.1 OF 2010 FBC-EXISTING |
| | BUILDING. |
| | |
| | **** RESPONSE TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: |
| | THERE IS NOT INFORMATION GIVEN ON THE TYPE AND SIZE OF |
| | THE EXISTING BEDROOM WINDOW #2. IT ONLY GIVES THE SIZE |
| | AND TYPE OF THE PROPOSED WINDOW. UNABLE TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE BEDROOM EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. |
| | 604.1 OF 2010 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. IN ADDITION, |
| | CLARIFY WHY WINDOW SCHEDULE SHOWS WINDOW #1 AS "IMPACT |
| | EGRESS". WINDOW #1 IS LOCATED IN THE LIVING ROOM AND IS |
| | NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE EGRESS WINDOWS. IS THE IMPACT |
| | EGRESS WINDOW MEANT TO BE THE ONE IN THE BEDROOM?. |
| | REVISE WINDOW SCHEDULE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | *** PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER CLEARLY ADDRESSING |
| | EACH COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
