Date |
Text |
2014-03-28 16:01:57 | REROOF, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| |
| 1- STEEL DECK: |
| A) PROVIDE COMPLETE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS USING THE |
| RESULTS OF THE WITHDRAWAL TEST REPORT (TAS 105) AS |
| REQUIRED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #6 ON LAST PAGE OF NOA |
| 13-0424.13 SUBMITTED. INFORMATION SUBMITTED ARE NOT RAS |
| 117 CALCULATIONS. SEC. 1609 OF 2010 FBC. ***NOTE: |
| COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1(C) BELOW. |
| |
| B) CLARIFY WHY THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE WOOD DECK |
| ARE DONE BASED ON BUILDING EXPOSURE "D", WHILE THE |
| DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE STEEL DECK ARE DONE BASED ON |
| BUILDING EXPOSURE "B". WHY TWO DIFFERENT BUILDING |
| EXPOSURES ON THE SAME BUILDING?. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| ***NOTE: ACCORDING TO SEC. 1609 THIS BUILDING IS |
| LOCATED IN EXPOSURE"C". |
| |
| C) CAREFULLY READ THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY ON PAGE 14 OF |
| NOA 13-0424.13 SUBMITTED. THIS ASSEMBLY REQUIRES THE |
| INSULATION TO BE MECHANICALLY FASTENED. THE RAS 117 |
| CALCULATIONS APPLY TO THE INSULATION FASTENING. |
| COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1(A) ABOVE. SEC. 1609 FBC. |
| |
| |
| 2- WOOD DECK: |
| A)REVISE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS. BASE SHEET FASTENING |
| DOESN'T WORK FOR ROOF ZONES # 2 AND #3 FOR THE |
| CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. PROVIDE THE RAS 117 |
| CALCULATIONS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. COORDINATE WITH |
| ITEM #1(B) ABOVE. SEC. 1609 FBC. |
| |
| |
| 3- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL, LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT, AND ALL DESIGN |
| PROFESSIONAL FEES. SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO $84,760 FOR 13,000 S.F. OF |
| ROOF AREA =/- . THE PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $2115.39. |
| |
| ***NOTES: ANY ROOF EQUIPMENT REMOVAL OR RETROFIT ROOF |
| DRAINS REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| (561)805-6712 |