Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 14030096
Permit Number 14030096
Review Stop B
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2014-09-04 13:58:15****CORRECTIONS****
 ****PLAN REVIEW IN PROGRESS****
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 PROJECT: LOFTIN PLACE
 CONTRACTOR CONTACT: [email protected] ,
 ARCHITECT: MSA ARCHITECTS, INC., JOSE I. SAUMELL,
 [email protected]
 ENGINEER: BBM STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, JOEL R.
 MIDDLEBROOKS PE [email protected]
 CONTACT: NEYITA LEIVA, LICENSE & PERMIT SERVICES:
 [email protected] 561-856-6655
  
 GENERAL COMMENT: IN THE CASE OF REDLINES, PLEASE
 INCORPORATE INTO ARCHITECT?S OR ENGINEER?S SHEETS AS
 APPLICABLE. THESE REDLINED/REVISE SHEETS DO NOT NEED TO
 BE SUBMITTED UNLESS REQUESTED IN THE COMMENT/PROVISO OR
 UNLESS THE SHEET IS REVISED IN THE FUTURE. IF THE SHEET
 CHANGES DUE TO ANOTHER REVIEWER'S COMMENT, PLEASE
 INCORPORATE REDLINES/NOTES.
 PROVISO - SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRED FOR SIGNAGE, AWNINGS
 PROVISO - PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR COMPONENTS AND CLADDING
 WILL BE SUBMITTED AT A FUTURE DATE PRIOR TO
 INSTALLATION, NO FEE. THEY ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY
 DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL.
 PROVISO - PRODUCT DATA TEST REPORTS REVIEWED BY
 DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR FLOORING ACOUSTIC INSULATION
 WILL BE PROVIDED AT A FUTURE DATE PRIOR TO
 INSTALLATION, NO FEE (FBC 1207.2, 1207.3, 603.1 FLAME
 SPREAD LESS THAN 200)
 PROVISO - DUROLAST NOA PROVIDED. THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY
 PROPOSED AND RAS117 CALCULATIONS (IF REQUIRED) TO BE
 SUBMITTED WITH ROOF PERMIT.
  
  
 COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LIST:
  
 1. C02 AND OTHER SHEETS, SCOPE OF WORK SHOWN ON
 MULTIPLE LOTS AS WELL AS A STREET/ALLEY TO BE
 ABANDONED. APPLICANT HAS INFORMED THAT A PLAT HAS BEEN
 FILED. PLEASE ADVISE WHEN THIS PROCESS IS COMPLETE, FBC
 CHAPTERS 5, 6, 7.
  
 2 - 4. OK
  
 5, 6, 8. SHEET SD1, THESE ITEMS HAVE BEEN
 REDLINED/ADDED TO THE PLANS.
  
 7, 9-12. OK
  
 13. PILES ARE NOT TO BE INSTALLED PER RESPONSE LETTER
 AND PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PROVIDED FOR FOUNDATION
 PERMIT APPLICATION. SEE SHEET S5.1, TYPICAL CONCRETE
 COLUMN. THIS DETAIL SHOWS A PILE CAP, PLEASE CLARIFY OR
 REMOVE FROM DETAIL.
 2ND REVIEW, GRAPHIC REMOVED BUT NOTE STILL INDICATES
 TOP OF PILE CAP. PLEASE REMOVE NOTE.
  
 14. 2ND REVIEW, FLOOR LIVE LOAD VALUES HAVE BEEN ADDED,
 LOCATIONS INDICATED ON NOTE D2 ON SHEET S0.1. PLEASE
 CLARIFY THE FOLLOWING:
 FOUNDATION DESIGN SHEET S1.1A IS INCLUDED IN NOTE D2
 BUT DESIGN LOAD VALUES NOT INCLUDED ON SHEET S1.1A.
 SHEET S1.2A AND OTHER SHEETS, 50 IS SHOWN FOR OFFICE
 LIVE LOAD. SEE FBC TABLE 1607.1, ITEMS 25 (OFFICE
 BUILDINGS) AND 27 (RESIDENTIAL). 25 OFFICE BUILDINGS,
 LOBBIES ARE TO BE 100. SEE 27, HOTELS AND MULTIFAMILY
 DWELLINGS, PUBLIC ROOMS TO BE 100. IT APPEARS THAT
 ALTHOUGH SOME OFFICE SPACE MAY BE 50, OTHER AREAS SUCH
 AS THE LOBBY AREA, BAR, GYMNASIUM (ITEM 18) ARE TO BE
 100.
 THE FLOOR LOAD FOR CONFERENCE ROOM NOT CLEAR. ALTHOUGH
 THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION IS BUSINESS, THE OCCUPANT
 LOAD SHOULD CONFORM TO FBC TABLE 1004.1.1 UNLESS
 DESIGNER IS USING THE EXCEPTION, IN WHICH CASE THIS
 SHOULD BE STATED. AS AN ASSEMBLY USE AREA, IT APPEARS
 THAT FLOOR LOAD SHOULD BE 100.
 SEE ALSO FBC 1607.4. IN OFFICE AREAS WHERE PARTITION
 AREAS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE, PROVISIONS FOR THE
 PARTITION WEIGHTS ARE TO BE MADE UNLESS SPECIFIED LIVE
 LOAD EXCEEDS 80PSF. SECOND FLOOR/AMENITY AREA SHOWS
 UNFINISHED FUTURE USE AREA. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT
 INTENDED FUTURE USE WILL BE OR WHAT THE LIVE LOAD HAS
 BEEN DESIGNED TO.
 LOADS FOR OTHER AREAS SUCH AS TREATMENT ROOM, SEATING
 AREA (2ND FLOOR) NOT SHOWN. SEE ALSO ITEM 4, ASSEMBLY
 AREAS, LOBBIES, OTHER AREAS, AND FIXED SEATS.
 30 ROOF. PLEASE SEE TABLE 1607.1, 300 CONCENTRATED
 REQUIRED WHERE ROOF SURFACE IS SUBJECT TO MAINTENANCE
 WORKERS. AS THIS BUILDING HAS ROOFTOP UNITS, IT WILL BE
 SUBJECT TO MAINTENANCE WORKERS AT SOME POINT. 100 PSF
 REQUIRED FOR ROOF USED FOR ASSEMBLY PURPOSES, SPECIAL
 PURPOSES TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON UPSE, SEE NOTE L.
 DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THE AREAS LISTED ARE NOT CLEAR,
 PLEASE REVISE TABLE.
 NOTE D2 STATES THAT 5TH FLOOR DESIGN LOAD IS ON SHEET
 S1.5A. THIS PAGE IS FOR 7TH FLOOR. CORRIDOR LIVE LOAD
 DROPS FROM 100 (FLOORS 2 THROUGH 4) TO 40 PSF. CONFIRM
 THAT THS IS DESIGN INTENT. PLEASE CORRECT PAGE
 REFERENCES.
 NOTE D2 STATES THAT 6TH FLOOR DESIGN LOAD IS ON SHEET
 S1.6A. THIS SHEET IS FOR THE 8TH FLOOR.
 CORRIDOR LIVE LOAD IS 100 FOR 8TH FLOOR. THE NOTE D2 IS
 NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE FLOORS, PLEASE CORRELATE. 5TH
 AND 6TH FLOOR ARE NOT ON THE PAGES STATED, 7TH FLOOR
 SHOULD BE S1.7A BUT IS PARTIAL ROOF, S1.8A AND S1.9A
 ARE REFERRED TO IN NOTE D2 (SHEET S0.1) BUT ARE NOT IN
 THE PLAN. PLEASE REVISE AND CLARIFY FLOOR DESIGN LIVE
 LOADS.
  
 15. SHEETS S1.2A, S1.5A INCLUDE THE RESIDENTIAL AND
 PARKING GARAGE FLOOR LOADS BUT OTHERS WHICH ARE
 APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT WERE NOT SPECIFIED, FBC
 1603.1.1. THE FLOOR LOADS FOR COMMON AREAS AND OFFICE
 AREAS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE TABLE, PLEASE REVISE,
 FBC TABLE 1607.1.
 NOT ALL COMMON AREAS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, SEE ITEM 14
 FOR SPECIFIC DETAILS. RESPONSE LETTER REFERS TO SHEETS
 1.1A TO 1.9A BUT UNABLE TO LOCATE SHEETS S1.8A AND
 S1.9A, ALSO THESE SHEETS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE INDEX.
  
 16. OK.
  
 17. 2ND REVIEW, REQUEST FOR DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ROOF
 C&C. DESIGN PRESSURES CONFLICT WITH THE PLAN. SHEET
 S1.8 FOR ROOF PRESSURES REFER TO A BUILDING HEIGHT OF
 <= 60?, THE ROOF HEIGHT EXCEEDS 60?, PLEASE REVISE ROOF
 HEIGHT AND PRESSURES AS APPLICABLE.
 ROOF DESIGN PRESSURES TREAT ZONE 3 AS ZONE 2. PLEASE
 SEE ASCE7010, FIGURE 30.6-1, FOOTNOTE , PARAPET TO BE
 EQUAL TO OR HIGHER THAN 3FT. DETAIL A A7.1 APPEARS TO
 SHOW A 2FT PARAPET AT STAIR 1, PLEASE CLARIFY OR
 INCLUDE ZONE 3 PRESSURES. REVISE ROOF PLAN TO CLARIFY
 WHERE HIGHER ZONE 3 DESIGN PRESSURES ARE REQUIRED.
 ROOF MEMBRANE DESIGN PRESSURE PROVIDED. WHERE ARE THE
 ?GROSS UPLIFT PRESSURES? ZONES 1, 2, AND 3 TO BE
 APPLIED, AS OPPOSED TO ?ROOF MEMBRANE DESIGN PRESSURES?
 ZONES 1, 2, AND 3? ROOF MEMBRANE DESIGN PRESSURES ARE
 LOWER, DO NOT APPEAR TO COMPLY WITH ROOFING COMPONENT
 AND CLADDING PRESSURES. CALCULATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED.
  
 18. OK
  
 19. REVISE LIFE SAFETY CALCULATIONS AS FOLLOWS:
 SHEET A0.1.1, THE CONFERENCE ROOM ALLOCATES 110 SF PER
 OCCUPANT, WHICH RESULTS IN AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 3.
 ALTHOUGH THIS CAN BE CLASSIFIED AS BUSINESS PER FBC
 303.1, THE DESIGN OCCUPANT LOAD SHOULD CONFORM TO FBC
 1004 (15 SF PER OCCUPANT) UNLESS DESIGNER IS USING THE
 EXCEPTION. IF THE EXCEPTION IS THE INTENT, PROVIDE
 RATIONALE FOR REDUCED OCCUPANT LOAD AND THIS MUST BE
 APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. IT APPEARS THAT USE
 OF THE TABULAR OCCUPANT LOAD WOULD RESULT IN AN
 OCCUPANT LOAD OF 20, AND EXITING APPEARS COMPLIANT FOR
 THE ADDITIONAL OCCUPANTS.
 SHEET A0.1.2, THERAPY ROOMS HAVE NA FOR LOAD FACTOR,
 OCCUPANT LOAD OF 2. THERE ARE TWO THERAPY ROOMS. 276
 SF, IT WOULD APPEAR THAT DESIGN LOAD SHOULD BE AT LEAST
 4 OR 6 (TWO OR THREE PEOPLE PER ROOM). THE WORD THERAPY
 IMPLIES A THERAPIST AND A GUEST; SOME SPAS HAVE TWO
 EMPLOYEES TO ONE GUEST. TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD OF 2 FOR
 TWO THERAPY ROOMS DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE AN ACCURATE
 DESIGN OCCUPANT LOAD.
 NOTE THAT PLUMBING FIXTURE CALCULATIONS OCCUPANT LOAD
 ON A2.1.1 CONFLICT WITH A0.1.2. PLEASE CORRELATE.
  
 20-21. OK
  
 22. PREVIOUS LIST REQUESTED EGRESS CAPACITY
 CALCULATIONS. ALTHOUGH TOTAL NUMBERS WERE PROVIDED,
 CAPACITY PER DOOR WAS NOT PROVIDED. SEE EXIT GATE AT
 OLIVE, WHICH IS A COMPONENT IN THE EXIT DISCHARGE, NOT
 CLEAR HOW MANY OCCUPANTS THIS IS DESIGNED TO
 ACCOMMODATE, FBC 1008.1. RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT
 LOSS OF ANY ONE EXIT WILL NOT REDUCE CAPACITY BY LESS
 THAN 50%, BUT IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW MANY OCCUPANTS ARE
 AFFECTED BY THE OLIVE AVE GATE. REVISE PLAN IN THIS
 AREA TO SHOW NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS PER EXIT AND EXIT
 DISCHARGE.
  
 23-28. OK
  
 29. OCCUPANT LOAD AND EXIT REQUIREMENTS/COMPLIANCE
 REQUESTED FOR ALL FLOORS. SEE A0.1.4. THE OCCUPANT LOAD
 TABLE IS MARKED GROUND FLOOR, BUT IS FOR THE
 RECREATIONAL ROOF DECK. SEE FBC 1004.1.1, OCCUPANTS TO
 BE DETERMINED BY TABLE 1004.1.1 UNLESS APPROVED BY THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL. NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS STATED FOR THIS
 ASSEMBLY AREA ARE VERY LOW. FOR INSTANCE, TENNIS COURT,
 OCCUPANT LOAD OF 4. OCCUPANCY LISTED IN THE TABLE FOR
 ?BOUNCE COURT? (BOCCE COURT?) IS 8, RUN TRACK IS 2.
 PROVISIONS HAVE NOT BEEN MADE FOR OCCUPANTS WAITING FOR
 USE OF THE COURTS, SPECTATORS, COACHES. THE ENTIRE
 ROOFTOP RECREATIONAL DECK HAS A STATED OCCUPANT LOAD OF
 26 FOR A SQUARE FOOT AREA OF 15,950 SQUARE FEET, WHICH
 RESULTS IN OVER 600SF PER PERSON FOR AN ASSEMBY
 OCCUPANCY. THIS APPEARS TO BE TOO LOW. PROVIDE A LETTER
 OF RATIONALE FOR SUCH A LOW OCCUPANT LOAD FOR BUILDING
 OFFICIAL?S CONSIDERATION OR INCREASE THE OCCUPANT LOAD
 TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE TABLE.
 PAST SIMILAR USES HAVE INCLUDED COACHES, SPECTATORS,
 INDIVIDUALS WAITING FOR USE OF THE AMENITIES, JUDGES OR
 REFERREES. OTHER SIMILAR BUILDINGS USE ROOFTOP AREAS AS
 TEMPORARY PARTY OR FUNCTION AREAS, UTILIZING TEMPORARY
 TENTS. IN REQUESTING A REDUCED OCCUPANT LOAD FROM THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL, ALL OF THESE ISSUES/POSSIBLE
 SCENARIOS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED.
 ALTHOUGH THE FBC PROVIDES AN EXCEPTION FOR USING DESIGN
 OCCUPANT LOAD WHEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL
 RATHER THAN THE OCCUPANT LOAD PER TABLE FBC 1004,
 PLEASE NOTE THAT A REDUCED OCCUPANT LOAD WOULD ALSO BE
 REQUIRED TO BE APPROVED BY FIRE.
  
 32. OK
  
 33. PREVIOUS COMMENT REQUESTED DOOR INFORMATION,
 RESPONSE LETTER INDICATES SHEETS WHERE DOOR IDENTIFIERS
 HAVE BEEN INCLUDED BUT NOT ALL OF THE DOORS ARE ON THE
 DOOR SCHEDULE. FOR INSTANCE, DOORS AT YOGA GROUP
 EXERCISE, CH101A AND CH101B DO NOT APPEAR ON THE DOOR
 SCHEDULE ON SHEET A5.1.6. DOOR SCHEDULE STARTS AT DOOR
 138, CORRIDOR ; UNABLE TO LOCATE AMENITY AREA DOOR
 SCHEDULE. PLEASE ADD TO SCHEDULE.
 DOOR 154.2, SHEET A5.1.1, APPEARS TO SERVE AN ASSEMBLY
 OCCUPANT LOAD GREATER THAN 50, SEE FBC 1008.1.10, FIRE
 OR PANIC EXIT HARDWARE REQUIRED. VERIFY ALL.
 GATES ARE TO MEET THE SAME REQUIREMENTS AS DOORS, FBC
 1008.2. PLEASE INCLUDE THE GATE INFORMATION IN THE DOOR
 SCHEDULE FOR COMPONENTS SERVING IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS
 AROUND THE POOL AREA.
  
 34-39. OK
  
 40. A 5.1.5 ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE PUBLIC AREAS HAS BEEN
 COMPLETED BUT REFERS TO ID SHEETS WHICH WERE NOT
 SUBMITTED. FOR BUILDING REVIEW PURPOSES, THIS
 INFORMATION CAN BE SUBMITTED AT A FUTURE DATE BUT ALL
 INTEIROR FINISHES TO COMPLY WITH FBC CHAPTER 8. ITEM 7
 DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FBC TABLE 803.9, PLEASE REVISE.
  
 41-45. OK
  
 46. A0.1.1, THE RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS COMMENT REGARDING
 NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS PER DOOR IS THAT THE OCCUPANT LOADS
 ARE SO SMALL THAT THERE IS NO NEED TO MARK EACH DOOR. I
 AGREE IN MOST INSTANCES, THE EXCEPTION BEING THE SINGLE
 GATE AT OLIVE AVENUE, SEE OTHER COMMENTS AND FIRE
 COMMENTS. ALSO MORE INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 THE AMENITY ROOFTOP AREA, SEE OTHER COMMENTS.
  
 47-49.
  
 50. A3.1.1 AND OTHER ELEVATION SHEETS, ITEM 5 SHOWS
 FOAM BACKED TRIM WHICH APPEARS TO EXTEND ABOVE 40FT
 (SEE VERTICAL ORIENTED TRIM WHICH EXTENDS FROM 4TH
 FLOOR TO UPPER FLOOR, SEE PLAN MARKUP) FBC 1406.2.2.
 THIS WAS CHANGED ON SHEET A3.1.1 BUT WAS NOT CHANGED ON
 A3.1.2. THE STAIR TRIM DETAIL ON 3.1.1 WAS REVISED BUT
 A3.1.2 SHOWS FOAM BACKED TRIP (NOTE 5), A3.1.3 DOES NOT
 HAVE A DETAIL MARKER. CHECK ALL ELEVATION SHEETS AND
 REVISE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 1406.2.2.
  
 51. SD1 SITE DATA, PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING
 DISTANCE FROM BUILDING TO STREET CENTERLINE TO SHOW
 COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 602 (FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE
 FBC 702) FOR NORTH, EAST, SOUTH ELEVATIONS.
 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES THIS INFORMATION IS
 PROVIDED ON THE GROUND FLOOR PLAN. UNABLE TO LOCATE
 THIS INFORMATION ON THE GROUND FLOOR PLAN, A2.1.1 OR
 LIFE SAFETY PLAN, A0.1.1. PLEASE ADVISE AS TO WHERE
 THIS INFORMATION CAN BE LOCATED.
  
 52-54. OK
  
 55. FBC 708.13.1, TRASH CHUTES, A7.9, FA AND OTHER
 SHEETS, DOORS TO BE SELF OR AUTOMATIC CLOSING. REVISE
 TO SHOW COMPLIANCE OR PROVIDE DATA SHEETS FOR PROPOSED
 TRASH CHUTE DOORS.
 2ND REVIEW, DOORS FROM CORRIDOR ARE NOTED AS SELF
 CLOSING BUT UNABLE TO LOCATE NOTE FOR TRASH CHUTE DOOR.
 EITHER PROVIDE SPEC DATA OR REVISE DETAIL ON A7.9.
  
 56-61. OK
  
 62. SHEET A5.1.7, PLAN HAS OUTDATED CODE REFERENCES (13
 C2.0, TABLE 13 C2.1.1) AND USES THE PHRASE RESIDENTIAL
 APPLICATIONS. FORMER CHAPTER 13 REFERENCES HAVE BEEN
 REPLACED BY FBC 2010 ENERGY CONSERVATION. SEE CHAPTER
 2, ALTHOUGH THIS BUILDING HAS RESIDENTIAL SPACE IT IS
 NOT A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING BY DEFINITION DUE TO HEIGHT.
 2ND REVIEW, PARTIALLY ADDRESSED; NOTES STILL MAKE
 REFERENCES TO CHAPTER 13 AND RESIDENTIAL APPLICATION.
  
 63. ENERGY CALC PROVIDED DOES NOT APPEAR CORRECT OR
 COMPLETE. IT STATES THAT CONDITIONED AREA IS 251777 SF,
 CONDITIONED AND UNCONDITIONED AREA IS THE SAME SQUARE
 FOOT AREA. SHEET A5.1.7 STATES THAT ALL EXTERIOR GLASS
 TO CLEAR AS PER ENERGY CALCULATIONS; SHEET A7.1 NOTE 18
 ALSO REFERS TO ENERGY CALCS FOR R VALUE, BUT ENERGY
 CALC DOES NOT SPECIFY THESE ITEMS, PLEASE CORRELATE.
  
 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE IS THAT THERE ARE NO UNCONDITIONED
 AREAS. PLEASE PROVIDE SOME CLARIFICATION; DOESN?T THE
 PARKING GARAGE, WHICH IS A PART OF THIS BUILDING, NEED
 TO BE INCLUDED? ALTHOUGH IT DOES NOT HAVE MECHANICAL
 EQUIPMENT IT SHOULD HAVE LIGHTING. FEEL FREE TO CONTACT
 ME IF YOU FEEL THAT I AM INCORRECT.
  
 64. OK
  
 65. FBC 2010 ENERGY CONSERVATION 502, SEE SHEET 2 OF
 THE ENERGY CALC, DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE COMPLETE. FOR
 INSTANCE, EXTERNAL LIGHTING, NONE ENTERED. THE
 QUESTION: MET ALL REQUIRED COMPLIANCE FROM CHECK LIST?
 WAS NOT COMPLETED. PROJECT SUMMARY LACKS THE ADDRESS
 (SEE FBC 2010 EC 506.4.1). PLEASE REVISE/COMPLETE
 ENERGY CALCS.
 2ND REVIEW, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS DO NOT APPEAR TO BE
 COMPLETE: DOORS (NONE SHOWN, BUT OPAQUE DOORS SHOWN ON
 PLAN), FLOORS (ONLY AMENITY AREA SHOWN), WATER HEATER
 (ONE) SHOWS NOT CHECKED, EXTERNAL LIGHTING NONE, OTHER
 ITEMS. ALTHOUGH ENERGY CALCS APPEAR TO BE COMPLIANT,
 PLEASE CONFIRM THAT ALL APPLICABLE ITEMS ARE COMPLETED.
 IF IT IS YOUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE CODE DOES NOT
 REQUIRE SOME OF THESE ITEMS, PLEASE CONTACT ME AT YOUR
 CONVENIENCE TO DISCUSS.
 66-69. OK
  
 70-71. OK
  
 72. A2.1.7, THERE APPEARS TO BE A 6INCH STEP FROM
 CORRIDORS 738 TO THE 7TH FLOOR AMENITIES. SEE FBC 2010
 ACCESSIBILITY, FAIR HOUSING, REQUIREMENT 2, PUBLIC AND
 COMMON USE AREAS ARE TO BE READILY ACCESSIBLE. RESPONSE
 LETTER STATES THAT A CURB RAMP WILL BE INSTALLED IN
 THIS LOCATION. SEE FBC 2010 ACCESSIBILITY, THIS AREA
 DOES NOT APPEAR TO GRAPHICALLY DEPICT A CURB RAMP. A
 DETAIL SHOULD BE PROVIDED EITHER AT THIS TIME OR PRIOR
 TO CONSTRUCTION.
  
 73-74. OK
  
 75. 2ND REVIEW, SEE FIRE COMMENTS. CONFIRM LOCATION OF
 PANIC AS WELL AS SELF CLOSING HARDWARE. DOORS FOR
 AMENITY AREA NOT SHOWN, FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR.
  
 76. OK
  
 77. SD1, INTERIOR FINISHES NOT CLEAR FBC TABLE 803.9.
 THEY HAVE BEEN REVISED BUT NOW DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE
 TABLE. THE AMENITY AND BUSINESS AREAS HAVE DIFFERENT
 REQUIREMENT S THAN THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS.
 78-83. OK.
  
 84. OK
  
 85-89. OK
  
 90. PARKING GARAGE, PLEASE SEE FAIR HOUSING DESIGN
 MANUAL, 2.23, 2% OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR
 RESIDENTS, MINIMUM OF ONE AT SALES/RENTAL OFFICE, AND
 NOT CLEAR WHETHER GUEST PARKING IS PROVIDED. PLEASE
 REVISE PARKING DATA TO SHOW COMPLIANCE.
 2ND REVIEW, GROUND FLOOR SHOWS 13 SPACES DESIGNATED AS
 VISITOR SPACES WITH ONE ACCESSIBLE SPACE. THE WORD
 VISITOR IMPLIES GUESTS OF THE RESIDENTS (FAIR HOUSING).
 WHERE IS THE PARKING FOR THE OFFICE STAFF AND NON
 RESIDENTS (ACCESSIBILITY)? PLEASE REWORD THE PARKING TO
 CLARIFY INTENT. PLANS AND NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES
 APPEAR COMPLIANT IF THIS AREA IS FOR OFFICE STAFF AND
 OFFICE VISITORS (NON RESIDENTS).
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 91. SEE FIRE COMMENT REGARDING GLAZING IN FIRE RATED
 WALLS.
  
 92. SEE FIRE COMMENTS REGARDING EXIT SIGNS.


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved