Date |
Text |
2014-09-04 13:58:15 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| ****PLAN REVIEW IN PROGRESS**** |
| SAMANTHA HILL |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| 561-805-6724 |
| |
| PROJECT: LOFTIN PLACE |
| CONTRACTOR CONTACT: [email protected] , |
| ARCHITECT: MSA ARCHITECTS, INC., JOSE I. SAUMELL, |
| [email protected] |
| ENGINEER: BBM STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, JOEL R. |
| MIDDLEBROOKS PE [email protected] |
| CONTACT: NEYITA LEIVA, LICENSE & PERMIT SERVICES: |
| [email protected] 561-856-6655 |
| |
| GENERAL COMMENT: IN THE CASE OF REDLINES, PLEASE |
| INCORPORATE INTO ARCHITECT?S OR ENGINEER?S SHEETS AS |
| APPLICABLE. THESE REDLINED/REVISE SHEETS DO NOT NEED TO |
| BE SUBMITTED UNLESS REQUESTED IN THE COMMENT/PROVISO OR |
| UNLESS THE SHEET IS REVISED IN THE FUTURE. IF THE SHEET |
| CHANGES DUE TO ANOTHER REVIEWER'S COMMENT, PLEASE |
| INCORPORATE REDLINES/NOTES. |
| PROVISO - SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRED FOR SIGNAGE, AWNINGS |
| PROVISO - PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR COMPONENTS AND CLADDING |
| WILL BE SUBMITTED AT A FUTURE DATE PRIOR TO |
| INSTALLATION, NO FEE. THEY ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| PROVISO - PRODUCT DATA TEST REPORTS REVIEWED BY |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR FLOORING ACOUSTIC INSULATION |
| WILL BE PROVIDED AT A FUTURE DATE PRIOR TO |
| INSTALLATION, NO FEE (FBC 1207.2, 1207.3, 603.1 FLAME |
| SPREAD LESS THAN 200) |
| PROVISO - DUROLAST NOA PROVIDED. THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY |
| PROPOSED AND RAS117 CALCULATIONS (IF REQUIRED) TO BE |
| SUBMITTED WITH ROOF PERMIT. |
| |
| |
| COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| |
| 1. C02 AND OTHER SHEETS, SCOPE OF WORK SHOWN ON |
| MULTIPLE LOTS AS WELL AS A STREET/ALLEY TO BE |
| ABANDONED. APPLICANT HAS INFORMED THAT A PLAT HAS BEEN |
| FILED. PLEASE ADVISE WHEN THIS PROCESS IS COMPLETE, FBC |
| CHAPTERS 5, 6, 7. |
| |
| 2 - 4. OK |
| |
| 5, 6, 8. SHEET SD1, THESE ITEMS HAVE BEEN |
| REDLINED/ADDED TO THE PLANS. |
| |
| 7, 9-12. OK |
| |
| 13. PILES ARE NOT TO BE INSTALLED PER RESPONSE LETTER |
| AND PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PROVIDED FOR FOUNDATION |
| PERMIT APPLICATION. SEE SHEET S5.1, TYPICAL CONCRETE |
| COLUMN. THIS DETAIL SHOWS A PILE CAP, PLEASE CLARIFY OR |
| REMOVE FROM DETAIL. |
| 2ND REVIEW, GRAPHIC REMOVED BUT NOTE STILL INDICATES |
| TOP OF PILE CAP. PLEASE REMOVE NOTE. |
| |
| 14. 2ND REVIEW, FLOOR LIVE LOAD VALUES HAVE BEEN ADDED, |
| LOCATIONS INDICATED ON NOTE D2 ON SHEET S0.1. PLEASE |
| CLARIFY THE FOLLOWING: |
| FOUNDATION DESIGN SHEET S1.1A IS INCLUDED IN NOTE D2 |
| BUT DESIGN LOAD VALUES NOT INCLUDED ON SHEET S1.1A. |
| SHEET S1.2A AND OTHER SHEETS, 50 IS SHOWN FOR OFFICE |
| LIVE LOAD. SEE FBC TABLE 1607.1, ITEMS 25 (OFFICE |
| BUILDINGS) AND 27 (RESIDENTIAL). 25 OFFICE BUILDINGS, |
| LOBBIES ARE TO BE 100. SEE 27, HOTELS AND MULTIFAMILY |
| DWELLINGS, PUBLIC ROOMS TO BE 100. IT APPEARS THAT |
| ALTHOUGH SOME OFFICE SPACE MAY BE 50, OTHER AREAS SUCH |
| AS THE LOBBY AREA, BAR, GYMNASIUM (ITEM 18) ARE TO BE |
| 100. |
| THE FLOOR LOAD FOR CONFERENCE ROOM NOT CLEAR. ALTHOUGH |
| THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION IS BUSINESS, THE OCCUPANT |
| LOAD SHOULD CONFORM TO FBC TABLE 1004.1.1 UNLESS |
| DESIGNER IS USING THE EXCEPTION, IN WHICH CASE THIS |
| SHOULD BE STATED. AS AN ASSEMBLY USE AREA, IT APPEARS |
| THAT FLOOR LOAD SHOULD BE 100. |
| SEE ALSO FBC 1607.4. IN OFFICE AREAS WHERE PARTITION |
| AREAS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE, PROVISIONS FOR THE |
| PARTITION WEIGHTS ARE TO BE MADE UNLESS SPECIFIED LIVE |
| LOAD EXCEEDS 80PSF. SECOND FLOOR/AMENITY AREA SHOWS |
| UNFINISHED FUTURE USE AREA. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT |
| INTENDED FUTURE USE WILL BE OR WHAT THE LIVE LOAD HAS |
| BEEN DESIGNED TO. |
| LOADS FOR OTHER AREAS SUCH AS TREATMENT ROOM, SEATING |
| AREA (2ND FLOOR) NOT SHOWN. SEE ALSO ITEM 4, ASSEMBLY |
| AREAS, LOBBIES, OTHER AREAS, AND FIXED SEATS. |
| 30 ROOF. PLEASE SEE TABLE 1607.1, 300 CONCENTRATED |
| REQUIRED WHERE ROOF SURFACE IS SUBJECT TO MAINTENANCE |
| WORKERS. AS THIS BUILDING HAS ROOFTOP UNITS, IT WILL BE |
| SUBJECT TO MAINTENANCE WORKERS AT SOME POINT. 100 PSF |
| REQUIRED FOR ROOF USED FOR ASSEMBLY PURPOSES, SPECIAL |
| PURPOSES TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON UPSE, SEE NOTE L. |
| DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THE AREAS LISTED ARE NOT CLEAR, |
| PLEASE REVISE TABLE. |
| NOTE D2 STATES THAT 5TH FLOOR DESIGN LOAD IS ON SHEET |
| S1.5A. THIS PAGE IS FOR 7TH FLOOR. CORRIDOR LIVE LOAD |
| DROPS FROM 100 (FLOORS 2 THROUGH 4) TO 40 PSF. CONFIRM |
| THAT THS IS DESIGN INTENT. PLEASE CORRECT PAGE |
| REFERENCES. |
| NOTE D2 STATES THAT 6TH FLOOR DESIGN LOAD IS ON SHEET |
| S1.6A. THIS SHEET IS FOR THE 8TH FLOOR. |
| CORRIDOR LIVE LOAD IS 100 FOR 8TH FLOOR. THE NOTE D2 IS |
| NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE FLOORS, PLEASE CORRELATE. 5TH |
| AND 6TH FLOOR ARE NOT ON THE PAGES STATED, 7TH FLOOR |
| SHOULD BE S1.7A BUT IS PARTIAL ROOF, S1.8A AND S1.9A |
| ARE REFERRED TO IN NOTE D2 (SHEET S0.1) BUT ARE NOT IN |
| THE PLAN. PLEASE REVISE AND CLARIFY FLOOR DESIGN LIVE |
| LOADS. |
| |
| 15. SHEETS S1.2A, S1.5A INCLUDE THE RESIDENTIAL AND |
| PARKING GARAGE FLOOR LOADS BUT OTHERS WHICH ARE |
| APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT WERE NOT SPECIFIED, FBC |
| 1603.1.1. THE FLOOR LOADS FOR COMMON AREAS AND OFFICE |
| AREAS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE TABLE, PLEASE REVISE, |
| FBC TABLE 1607.1. |
| NOT ALL COMMON AREAS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, SEE ITEM 14 |
| FOR SPECIFIC DETAILS. RESPONSE LETTER REFERS TO SHEETS |
| 1.1A TO 1.9A BUT UNABLE TO LOCATE SHEETS S1.8A AND |
| S1.9A, ALSO THESE SHEETS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE INDEX. |
| |
| 16. OK. |
| |
| 17. 2ND REVIEW, REQUEST FOR DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ROOF |
| C&C. DESIGN PRESSURES CONFLICT WITH THE PLAN. SHEET |
| S1.8 FOR ROOF PRESSURES REFER TO A BUILDING HEIGHT OF |
| <= 60?, THE ROOF HEIGHT EXCEEDS 60?, PLEASE REVISE ROOF |
| HEIGHT AND PRESSURES AS APPLICABLE. |
| ROOF DESIGN PRESSURES TREAT ZONE 3 AS ZONE 2. PLEASE |
| SEE ASCE7010, FIGURE 30.6-1, FOOTNOTE , PARAPET TO BE |
| EQUAL TO OR HIGHER THAN 3FT. DETAIL A A7.1 APPEARS TO |
| SHOW A 2FT PARAPET AT STAIR 1, PLEASE CLARIFY OR |
| INCLUDE ZONE 3 PRESSURES. REVISE ROOF PLAN TO CLARIFY |
| WHERE HIGHER ZONE 3 DESIGN PRESSURES ARE REQUIRED. |
| ROOF MEMBRANE DESIGN PRESSURE PROVIDED. WHERE ARE THE |
| ?GROSS UPLIFT PRESSURES? ZONES 1, 2, AND 3 TO BE |
| APPLIED, AS OPPOSED TO ?ROOF MEMBRANE DESIGN PRESSURES? |
| ZONES 1, 2, AND 3? ROOF MEMBRANE DESIGN PRESSURES ARE |
| LOWER, DO NOT APPEAR TO COMPLY WITH ROOFING COMPONENT |
| AND CLADDING PRESSURES. CALCULATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. |
| |
| 18. OK |
| |
| 19. REVISE LIFE SAFETY CALCULATIONS AS FOLLOWS: |
| SHEET A0.1.1, THE CONFERENCE ROOM ALLOCATES 110 SF PER |
| OCCUPANT, WHICH RESULTS IN AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 3. |
| ALTHOUGH THIS CAN BE CLASSIFIED AS BUSINESS PER FBC |
| 303.1, THE DESIGN OCCUPANT LOAD SHOULD CONFORM TO FBC |
| 1004 (15 SF PER OCCUPANT) UNLESS DESIGNER IS USING THE |
| EXCEPTION. IF THE EXCEPTION IS THE INTENT, PROVIDE |
| RATIONALE FOR REDUCED OCCUPANT LOAD AND THIS MUST BE |
| APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. IT APPEARS THAT USE |
| OF THE TABULAR OCCUPANT LOAD WOULD RESULT IN AN |
| OCCUPANT LOAD OF 20, AND EXITING APPEARS COMPLIANT FOR |
| THE ADDITIONAL OCCUPANTS. |
| SHEET A0.1.2, THERAPY ROOMS HAVE NA FOR LOAD FACTOR, |
| OCCUPANT LOAD OF 2. THERE ARE TWO THERAPY ROOMS. 276 |
| SF, IT WOULD APPEAR THAT DESIGN LOAD SHOULD BE AT LEAST |
| 4 OR 6 (TWO OR THREE PEOPLE PER ROOM). THE WORD THERAPY |
| IMPLIES A THERAPIST AND A GUEST; SOME SPAS HAVE TWO |
| EMPLOYEES TO ONE GUEST. TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD OF 2 FOR |
| TWO THERAPY ROOMS DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE AN ACCURATE |
| DESIGN OCCUPANT LOAD. |
| NOTE THAT PLUMBING FIXTURE CALCULATIONS OCCUPANT LOAD |
| ON A2.1.1 CONFLICT WITH A0.1.2. PLEASE CORRELATE. |
| |
| 20-21. OK |
| |
| 22. PREVIOUS LIST REQUESTED EGRESS CAPACITY |
| CALCULATIONS. ALTHOUGH TOTAL NUMBERS WERE PROVIDED, |
| CAPACITY PER DOOR WAS NOT PROVIDED. SEE EXIT GATE AT |
| OLIVE, WHICH IS A COMPONENT IN THE EXIT DISCHARGE, NOT |
| CLEAR HOW MANY OCCUPANTS THIS IS DESIGNED TO |
| ACCOMMODATE, FBC 1008.1. RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT |
| LOSS OF ANY ONE EXIT WILL NOT REDUCE CAPACITY BY LESS |
| THAN 50%, BUT IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW MANY OCCUPANTS ARE |
| AFFECTED BY THE OLIVE AVE GATE. REVISE PLAN IN THIS |
| AREA TO SHOW NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS PER EXIT AND EXIT |
| DISCHARGE. |
| |
| 23-28. OK |
| |
| 29. OCCUPANT LOAD AND EXIT REQUIREMENTS/COMPLIANCE |
| REQUESTED FOR ALL FLOORS. SEE A0.1.4. THE OCCUPANT LOAD |
| TABLE IS MARKED GROUND FLOOR, BUT IS FOR THE |
| RECREATIONAL ROOF DECK. SEE FBC 1004.1.1, OCCUPANTS TO |
| BE DETERMINED BY TABLE 1004.1.1 UNLESS APPROVED BY THE |
| BUILDING OFFICIAL. NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS STATED FOR THIS |
| ASSEMBLY AREA ARE VERY LOW. FOR INSTANCE, TENNIS COURT, |
| OCCUPANT LOAD OF 4. OCCUPANCY LISTED IN THE TABLE FOR |
| ?BOUNCE COURT? (BOCCE COURT?) IS 8, RUN TRACK IS 2. |
| PROVISIONS HAVE NOT BEEN MADE FOR OCCUPANTS WAITING FOR |
| USE OF THE COURTS, SPECTATORS, COACHES. THE ENTIRE |
| ROOFTOP RECREATIONAL DECK HAS A STATED OCCUPANT LOAD OF |
| 26 FOR A SQUARE FOOT AREA OF 15,950 SQUARE FEET, WHICH |
| RESULTS IN OVER 600SF PER PERSON FOR AN ASSEMBY |
| OCCUPANCY. THIS APPEARS TO BE TOO LOW. PROVIDE A LETTER |
| OF RATIONALE FOR SUCH A LOW OCCUPANT LOAD FOR BUILDING |
| OFFICIAL?S CONSIDERATION OR INCREASE THE OCCUPANT LOAD |
| TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE TABLE. |
| PAST SIMILAR USES HAVE INCLUDED COACHES, SPECTATORS, |
| INDIVIDUALS WAITING FOR USE OF THE AMENITIES, JUDGES OR |
| REFERREES. OTHER SIMILAR BUILDINGS USE ROOFTOP AREAS AS |
| TEMPORARY PARTY OR FUNCTION AREAS, UTILIZING TEMPORARY |
| TENTS. IN REQUESTING A REDUCED OCCUPANT LOAD FROM THE |
| BUILDING OFFICIAL, ALL OF THESE ISSUES/POSSIBLE |
| SCENARIOS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED. |
| ALTHOUGH THE FBC PROVIDES AN EXCEPTION FOR USING DESIGN |
| OCCUPANT LOAD WHEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL |
| RATHER THAN THE OCCUPANT LOAD PER TABLE FBC 1004, |
| PLEASE NOTE THAT A REDUCED OCCUPANT LOAD WOULD ALSO BE |
| REQUIRED TO BE APPROVED BY FIRE. |
| |
| 32. OK |
| |
| 33. PREVIOUS COMMENT REQUESTED DOOR INFORMATION, |
| RESPONSE LETTER INDICATES SHEETS WHERE DOOR IDENTIFIERS |
| HAVE BEEN INCLUDED BUT NOT ALL OF THE DOORS ARE ON THE |
| DOOR SCHEDULE. FOR INSTANCE, DOORS AT YOGA GROUP |
| EXERCISE, CH101A AND CH101B DO NOT APPEAR ON THE DOOR |
| SCHEDULE ON SHEET A5.1.6. DOOR SCHEDULE STARTS AT DOOR |
| 138, CORRIDOR ; UNABLE TO LOCATE AMENITY AREA DOOR |
| SCHEDULE. PLEASE ADD TO SCHEDULE. |
| DOOR 154.2, SHEET A5.1.1, APPEARS TO SERVE AN ASSEMBLY |
| OCCUPANT LOAD GREATER THAN 50, SEE FBC 1008.1.10, FIRE |
| OR PANIC EXIT HARDWARE REQUIRED. VERIFY ALL. |
| GATES ARE TO MEET THE SAME REQUIREMENTS AS DOORS, FBC |
| 1008.2. PLEASE INCLUDE THE GATE INFORMATION IN THE DOOR |
| SCHEDULE FOR COMPONENTS SERVING IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS |
| AROUND THE POOL AREA. |
| |
| 34-39. OK |
| |
| 40. A 5.1.5 ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE PUBLIC AREAS HAS BEEN |
| COMPLETED BUT REFERS TO ID SHEETS WHICH WERE NOT |
| SUBMITTED. FOR BUILDING REVIEW PURPOSES, THIS |
| INFORMATION CAN BE SUBMITTED AT A FUTURE DATE BUT ALL |
| INTEIROR FINISHES TO COMPLY WITH FBC CHAPTER 8. ITEM 7 |
| DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FBC TABLE 803.9, PLEASE REVISE. |
| |
| 41-45. OK |
| |
| 46. A0.1.1, THE RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS COMMENT REGARDING |
| NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS PER DOOR IS THAT THE OCCUPANT LOADS |
| ARE SO SMALL THAT THERE IS NO NEED TO MARK EACH DOOR. I |
| AGREE IN MOST INSTANCES, THE EXCEPTION BEING THE SINGLE |
| GATE AT OLIVE AVENUE, SEE OTHER COMMENTS AND FIRE |
| COMMENTS. ALSO MORE INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR |
| THE AMENITY ROOFTOP AREA, SEE OTHER COMMENTS. |
| |
| 47-49. |
| |
| 50. A3.1.1 AND OTHER ELEVATION SHEETS, ITEM 5 SHOWS |
| FOAM BACKED TRIM WHICH APPEARS TO EXTEND ABOVE 40FT |
| (SEE VERTICAL ORIENTED TRIM WHICH EXTENDS FROM 4TH |
| FLOOR TO UPPER FLOOR, SEE PLAN MARKUP) FBC 1406.2.2. |
| THIS WAS CHANGED ON SHEET A3.1.1 BUT WAS NOT CHANGED ON |
| A3.1.2. THE STAIR TRIM DETAIL ON 3.1.1 WAS REVISED BUT |
| A3.1.2 SHOWS FOAM BACKED TRIP (NOTE 5), A3.1.3 DOES NOT |
| HAVE A DETAIL MARKER. CHECK ALL ELEVATION SHEETS AND |
| REVISE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 1406.2.2. |
| |
| 51. SD1 SITE DATA, PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING |
| DISTANCE FROM BUILDING TO STREET CENTERLINE TO SHOW |
| COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 602 (FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE |
| FBC 702) FOR NORTH, EAST, SOUTH ELEVATIONS. |
| 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES THIS INFORMATION IS |
| PROVIDED ON THE GROUND FLOOR PLAN. UNABLE TO LOCATE |
| THIS INFORMATION ON THE GROUND FLOOR PLAN, A2.1.1 OR |
| LIFE SAFETY PLAN, A0.1.1. PLEASE ADVISE AS TO WHERE |
| THIS INFORMATION CAN BE LOCATED. |
| |
| 52-54. OK |
| |
| 55. FBC 708.13.1, TRASH CHUTES, A7.9, FA AND OTHER |
| SHEETS, DOORS TO BE SELF OR AUTOMATIC CLOSING. REVISE |
| TO SHOW COMPLIANCE OR PROVIDE DATA SHEETS FOR PROPOSED |
| TRASH CHUTE DOORS. |
| 2ND REVIEW, DOORS FROM CORRIDOR ARE NOTED AS SELF |
| CLOSING BUT UNABLE TO LOCATE NOTE FOR TRASH CHUTE DOOR. |
| EITHER PROVIDE SPEC DATA OR REVISE DETAIL ON A7.9. |
| |
| 56-61. OK |
| |
| 62. SHEET A5.1.7, PLAN HAS OUTDATED CODE REFERENCES (13 |
| C2.0, TABLE 13 C2.1.1) AND USES THE PHRASE RESIDENTIAL |
| APPLICATIONS. FORMER CHAPTER 13 REFERENCES HAVE BEEN |
| REPLACED BY FBC 2010 ENERGY CONSERVATION. SEE CHAPTER |
| 2, ALTHOUGH THIS BUILDING HAS RESIDENTIAL SPACE IT IS |
| NOT A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING BY DEFINITION DUE TO HEIGHT. |
| 2ND REVIEW, PARTIALLY ADDRESSED; NOTES STILL MAKE |
| REFERENCES TO CHAPTER 13 AND RESIDENTIAL APPLICATION. |
| |
| 63. ENERGY CALC PROVIDED DOES NOT APPEAR CORRECT OR |
| COMPLETE. IT STATES THAT CONDITIONED AREA IS 251777 SF, |
| CONDITIONED AND UNCONDITIONED AREA IS THE SAME SQUARE |
| FOOT AREA. SHEET A5.1.7 STATES THAT ALL EXTERIOR GLASS |
| TO CLEAR AS PER ENERGY CALCULATIONS; SHEET A7.1 NOTE 18 |
| ALSO REFERS TO ENERGY CALCS FOR R VALUE, BUT ENERGY |
| CALC DOES NOT SPECIFY THESE ITEMS, PLEASE CORRELATE. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE IS THAT THERE ARE NO UNCONDITIONED |
| AREAS. PLEASE PROVIDE SOME CLARIFICATION; DOESN?T THE |
| PARKING GARAGE, WHICH IS A PART OF THIS BUILDING, NEED |
| TO BE INCLUDED? ALTHOUGH IT DOES NOT HAVE MECHANICAL |
| EQUIPMENT IT SHOULD HAVE LIGHTING. FEEL FREE TO CONTACT |
| ME IF YOU FEEL THAT I AM INCORRECT. |
| |
| 64. OK |
| |
| 65. FBC 2010 ENERGY CONSERVATION 502, SEE SHEET 2 OF |
| THE ENERGY CALC, DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE COMPLETE. FOR |
| INSTANCE, EXTERNAL LIGHTING, NONE ENTERED. THE |
| QUESTION: MET ALL REQUIRED COMPLIANCE FROM CHECK LIST? |
| WAS NOT COMPLETED. PROJECT SUMMARY LACKS THE ADDRESS |
| (SEE FBC 2010 EC 506.4.1). PLEASE REVISE/COMPLETE |
| ENERGY CALCS. |
| 2ND REVIEW, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS DO NOT APPEAR TO BE |
| COMPLETE: DOORS (NONE SHOWN, BUT OPAQUE DOORS SHOWN ON |
| PLAN), FLOORS (ONLY AMENITY AREA SHOWN), WATER HEATER |
| (ONE) SHOWS NOT CHECKED, EXTERNAL LIGHTING NONE, OTHER |
| ITEMS. ALTHOUGH ENERGY CALCS APPEAR TO BE COMPLIANT, |
| PLEASE CONFIRM THAT ALL APPLICABLE ITEMS ARE COMPLETED. |
| IF IT IS YOUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE CODE DOES NOT |
| REQUIRE SOME OF THESE ITEMS, PLEASE CONTACT ME AT YOUR |
| CONVENIENCE TO DISCUSS. |
| 66-69. OK |
| |
| 70-71. OK |
| |
| 72. A2.1.7, THERE APPEARS TO BE A 6INCH STEP FROM |
| CORRIDORS 738 TO THE 7TH FLOOR AMENITIES. SEE FBC 2010 |
| ACCESSIBILITY, FAIR HOUSING, REQUIREMENT 2, PUBLIC AND |
| COMMON USE AREAS ARE TO BE READILY ACCESSIBLE. RESPONSE |
| LETTER STATES THAT A CURB RAMP WILL BE INSTALLED IN |
| THIS LOCATION. SEE FBC 2010 ACCESSIBILITY, THIS AREA |
| DOES NOT APPEAR TO GRAPHICALLY DEPICT A CURB RAMP. A |
| DETAIL SHOULD BE PROVIDED EITHER AT THIS TIME OR PRIOR |
| TO CONSTRUCTION. |
| |
| 73-74. OK |
| |
| 75. 2ND REVIEW, SEE FIRE COMMENTS. CONFIRM LOCATION OF |
| PANIC AS WELL AS SELF CLOSING HARDWARE. DOORS FOR |
| AMENITY AREA NOT SHOWN, FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR. |
| |
| 76. OK |
| |
| 77. SD1, INTERIOR FINISHES NOT CLEAR FBC TABLE 803.9. |
| THEY HAVE BEEN REVISED BUT NOW DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE |
| TABLE. THE AMENITY AND BUSINESS AREAS HAVE DIFFERENT |
| REQUIREMENT S THAN THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS. |
| 78-83. OK. |
| |
| 84. OK |
| |
| 85-89. OK |
| |
| 90. PARKING GARAGE, PLEASE SEE FAIR HOUSING DESIGN |
| MANUAL, 2.23, 2% OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR |
| RESIDENTS, MINIMUM OF ONE AT SALES/RENTAL OFFICE, AND |
| NOT CLEAR WHETHER GUEST PARKING IS PROVIDED. PLEASE |
| REVISE PARKING DATA TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| 2ND REVIEW, GROUND FLOOR SHOWS 13 SPACES DESIGNATED AS |
| VISITOR SPACES WITH ONE ACCESSIBLE SPACE. THE WORD |
| VISITOR IMPLIES GUESTS OF THE RESIDENTS (FAIR HOUSING). |
| WHERE IS THE PARKING FOR THE OFFICE STAFF AND NON |
| RESIDENTS (ACCESSIBILITY)? PLEASE REWORD THE PARKING TO |
| CLARIFY INTENT. PLANS AND NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES |
| APPEAR COMPLIANT IF THIS AREA IS FOR OFFICE STAFF AND |
| OFFICE VISITORS (NON RESIDENTS). |
| |
| NEW COMMENTS: |
| |
| 91. SEE FIRE COMMENT REGARDING GLAZING IN FIRE RATED |
| WALLS. |
| |
| 92. SEE FIRE COMMENTS REGARDING EXIT SIGNS. |