| Plan Review Notes For Permit 14021097 |
| Permit Number |
14021097 |
|
| Review Stop |
B |
| Sequence Number |
5 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2015-01-05 08:39:49 | 2010 FBC | | | 4TH REVIEW | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) THE INFORMATION LISTED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATION IS | | | NOT CONSISTANT WITH THE EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS | | | OR THE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ON THE MECHANICAL PLANS. THE | | | SEER AND BTUS FOR THE HEATING AND COOLING ARE | | | DIFFERENT. PLEASE CORRECT. THE INFORMATION ON THE PLANS | | | AND ENERGY FORMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE CONSISTENT. FBC | | | R107.2.1 | | | THE RESULTS ON THE RESUMBMITTED EQUIPMENT SIZING | | | CALCULATIONS WERE IMPROPERLY CHANGED. | | | THE EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS CAN NOT BE CHANGED BY | | | SOMEONE CROSSING OUT THE RESULTS ON THE SUMMARY SHEET | | | AND WRITING IN DIFFERENT RESULTS. THE CARRIER MODEL | | | 24ACC624A HAS A MAXIMUM SEER OF 16 AND THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATION FORM LISTS R-17. THE ENERGY CALCULATION | | | FORM LISTS THE WALL INSULATION AS R-5 AND SHEET A102 OF | | | THE PLANS HAS R-4.2THE EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS | | | AND THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE RE-DONE | | | USING THE SAME INPUT INFORMATION SO THAT THE REPORTS | | | ARE CONSISTENT WITH EACH OTHER. | | | | | | 2) THE PREPARER AND THE OWNER/AGENT ARE REQUIRED TO | | | SIGN THE ENERGY CALC. FORM. FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | SECTION 103.2.3.2 THE NEW FORMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SIGNED. | | | | | | 3) MAKE SURE THAT THE CORRECT INFORMATION APPEARS IN | | | THE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ON THE MECHANICAL PLAN. FBC | | | 107.2.1 | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
