Date |
Text |
2014-01-25 11:19:35 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| 561-805-6724 |
| |
| 1. REVISE FLOOR PLAN TO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING |
| INFORMATION FOR THE TWO BEDROOMS WITH WINDOWS H, I, J; |
| FBC R310, FBC EB 604.1 . THE CLEAR OPENING CANNOT BE |
| REDUCED BY MORE THAN 5%: |
| |
| REVISE PLAN TO STATE WHAT TYPE OF WINDOW IS THERE NOW |
| IN THE BEDROOMS - AWNING, CASEMENT, SINGLE HUNG? |
| |
| REVISE PLAN TO STATE WHAT THE EXISTING CLEAR OPENING |
| DIMENSIONS ARE. CLEAR OPENING IS THE OPENING WHICH |
| EXISTS WHEN THE WINDOW IS FULLY OPEN. |
| |
| REVISE PLAN TO STATE WHAT THE PROPOSED CLEAR OPENING |
| DIMENSIONS ARE. THIS CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE |
| MANUFACTURER. |
| |
| THERE IS A NOTE ON THE PLAN REGARDING EMERGENCY EGRESS |
| WINDOWS REQUIREMENTS, BUT ENGINEER SPECIFIES BEDROOM |
| WINDOWS WHICH DO NOT COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENTS. |
| PURPOSE OF THE "EMERGENCY EGRESS WINDOWS" NOTE IS NOT |
| CLEAR. ALSO GROUND FLOOR REQUIREMENT OF 5.7 FEET |
| EXCEEDS MINIMUM CODE REQUREMENT. IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO |
| EXCEED MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS BUT IT DOES NOT APPEAR |
| THAT THE WINDOWS MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. WINDOW |
| DIMENSION INDUSTRY STANDARD IS TO BE EXPRESSED AS WIDTH |
| X HEIGHT. ARE THE WINDOW SIZES NOTED INCORRECTLY? |
| |
| 2. VALUE IS TOO LOW. VALUE IS TO INCLUDE LABOR, |
| MATERIALS, OVERHEAD, PROFIT, ENGINEERING FBC 109. |
| PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS JOB. |
| |
| 3. TWO COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS REQUIRED. ONLY ONE SET OF |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS PROVIDED FBC 107. FAILURE TO PROVIDE |
| TWO COMPLETE SETS MAY RESULT IN ADMIN/COPY FEES |
| ASSESSED. |
| |
| 4. HORIZONTAL ROLLER PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED, BUT |
| WINDOW AND DOOR SCHEDULE DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY |
| HORIZONTAL ROLLER WINDOWS. SCOPE NOT CLEAR; FBC 107. |
| |
| |
| |