Date |
Text |
2014-01-02 10:13:17 | 2010 FBC |
| |
| DENIED BY BUILDING |
| |
| 1) THE STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD |
| AREA ( FLOOD ZONE A5 ). THE REQUIRED FINISH FLOOR |
| ELEVATION IS 7'-6". BASED ON FEMA REGULATIONS AND THE |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE THIS ADDITION IS |
| CONSIDERED A SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT. (THE VALUE OF THE |
| PROPOSED WORK PLUS PREVIOUS WORK DONE TO THE STRUCTURE |
| EXCEEDS 50 PER CENT OF THE APPRAISED VALUE OF THE |
| STRUCTURE ($ 69,910.00 PER PBC PROPERTY APPRAISER). |
| THEREFORE, THE ADDITION, THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND THE |
| EQUIPMENT SERVING THEM ARE REQUIRED TO BE AT OR ABOVE |
| THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 7'-6". SPECIFY THE FINISHED |
| FLOOR ELEVATIONS OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND THE |
| PROPOSED ADDITION ON THE PLANS. IF THE ELEVATIONS ARE |
| BELOW THE REQUIRED MINIMUM 7'-6" BFE INDICATE HOW THIS |
| ISSUE WILL BE ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 2) THE ENGINEER'S SEAL THAT WAS USED IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. |
| AS OF JANUARY 1, 2002, THE WORD CERTIFICATE WAS |
| REQUIRED TO BE REPLACED BY THE WORD LICENSE. FAC |
| 61G15-23.001 |
| |
| 3) THE ONLY ENGINEER'S NAME THAT APPEARS IN THE TITLE |
| BLOCK ON SHEET 4 OF THE PLANS IS RICK BOYETTE. |
| THEREFORE, HE SHOULD SIGN AND SEAL THAT SHEET AS THE |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK INDICATED ON |
| THAT SHEET. FAC 61G-15-23.002 |
| |
| 4) THE EXPOSURE CATEGORY THAT IS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS |
| IS INCORRECT. BECAUSE THE STRUCTURE IS LOCATED ON THE |
| INTER-COASTAL WATERWAY IT IS EXPOSURE CATEGORY D. FBCR |
| 301.2.1.4 |
| |
| 5) THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRESSURES IN THE SCHEDULE |
| ON SHEETS 1 AND 2 NEED TO BE REVISED TO COMPLY WITH |
| EXPOSURE D. FBCR 301.2.1 |
| |
| 6) PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL DETAIL FOR THE EXTERIOR DOOR |
| OPENINGS THAT ARE TO BE FRAMED-IN WHEN THE GARAGE IS |
| CONVERTED TO HABITABLE SPACE. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1.3 |
| |
| 7) THERE IS CONFLICTING INFORMATION ON THE PLANS FOR |
| THE ROOF COVERING. THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS ON SHEETS 1 |
| AND 2 SHOW CONCRETE S-TILE AND THE WALL SECTIONS ON |
| SHEET 7 SPECIFY ASPHALT SHINGLES. PLEASE CLARIFY. CITY |
| AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| |
| 8) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE ROOF |
| COVERING MATERIAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3. IF |
| CEMENT S-TILE IS USED INDICATE THE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT |
| THAT WILL BE USED TO INSTALL THE TILE IS CAPABLE OF |
| RESISTING THE REQUIRED OVERTURN MOMENT. FBCR 905.3 IF |
| AN ADHESIVE PRODUCT WILL BE USED, SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF |
| ITS' PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| |
| 9) SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS THAT WILL BE USED TO SECURE |
| THE OVERHANG FRAMING AT THE GABLE END SHOWN IN THE |
| DETAIL ON SHEET 6. FBCR 801.2 |
| |
| 10) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR THE |
| CONVERTED GARAGE AND ADDITION. 2010 FBC ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION 101.4.3 |
| |
| 11) THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBERS FOR THE |
| STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS IN THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET 5 ARE |
| INCORRECT. PLEASE UPDATE AND REVISE THE SCHEDULE. DCA |
| RULE 9N-3 |
| |
| 12) ALSO ON SHEET 5, UPDATE REVISE NOTE 10 FROM THE |
| 2005 SIMPSON AND USP CATALOGS TO THE CURRENT ONES. FBCR |
| 301.2.1 |
| |
| 13) PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR STRUCTURAL |
| MULLIONS. I DID NOT SEE ANYWHERE ON THE PLANS THAT |
| WOULD REQUIRE MULLIONS. PLEASE CLARIFY. CITY AMENDMENTS |
| 107.2.1 |
| |
| 14) THE VALUE SPECIFIED ON THE APPLICATION OF |
| $25,000.00 FOR THE PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK. PLEASE |
| PROVIDE A DETAILED COST VALUATION AND REFERENCE THE |
| LATEST CITY AMENDMENTS 109.3 |
| |
| 15) PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH |
| OF THE REVIEW ITEMS WAS ADDRESSED. THIS WILL HELP |
| REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME. |
| |
| ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| (561)805-6714 |
| [email protected] |
2013-12-12 17:14:17 | IN BIN R10 |