Date |
Text |
2013-10-21 16:37:53 | FAILED |
| |
| 1) IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT THE SCOPE OF WORK IS FOR THIS |
| PERMIT. THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN |
| SHOW FEATURES REMAINING THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE OTHER |
| PLANS. THE APPLICATION IS FOR "INTERIOR REMIX AND |
| RENOVATION, EXTERIOR RENOVATION". THE CITY DOES NOT |
| PERMIT ALL OF THE WORK DESCRIBED, INCLUDING THE SITE |
| WORK, PARKING, FENCING AND LANDSCAPING PLANS, ON THE |
| SAME PERMIT AS THE WORK ON THE BUILDINGS. SEPARATE |
| PERMITS WITH PLANS, EACH WITH THE VALUE OF THE WORK |
| APPLIED SEPARATELY, ARE REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLOWING: |
| |
| A. PARKING LOT, TO INCLUDE THE STRIPING. |
| B. LANDSCAPE WORK. NOTE ANY TREE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION |
| REQUIRES A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT. |
| C. SIGNAGE |
| D. FENCES AND GATES. |
| E. TRASH ENCLOSURES. |
| F. IRRIGATION. |
| |
| 2) THE PERMITS FOR EXTERIOR WORK WILL REQUIRE THE |
| SUBMITTAL OF TWO COPIES OF A RECENT SIGNED AND SEALED |
| SURVEY, LESS THAN ONE YEAR OLD, SHOWING THE EXTERIOR |
| FEATURES ON THE SITE. |
| |
| 3) THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED COMMERCIAL PLANNED |
| DEVELOPMENT, SO ANY CHANGES TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE SITE |
| REQUIRE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. WHILE AN |
| AMENDMENT WAS FILED ON FEBRUARY 28, 2013, NONE OF THE |
| COMMENTS ISSUED AT THE TIME WERE ADDRESSED. THIS PERMIT |
| APPEARS TO SHOW DIFFERENT CONDITIONS FROM THE PLAN AT |
| THE TIME OF THE AMENDMENT APPLICATION. |
| |
| 4) THE PORTION OF THE PARKING LOT ALONG THE SOUTH |
| PROPERTY LINE WHERE PAVEMENT IS BEING REMOVED WITHIN |
| THE FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA MAY NOT BE |
| FILLED IN WITH PAVEMENT, BUT RATHER SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| 5) THE PAVING AND GRADING PLAN SHOWS AREAS OF THE |
| PARKING LOT PROPOSED FOR MILLING AND OVERLAY. PLEASE |
| CLEARLY DESIGNATE THESE AREAS ON THE PLANS. THESE AREAS |
| ARE CONSIDERED NEW PARKING LOTS AND SHALL HAVE ALL THE |
| REQUIRED LANDSCAPE INSTALLED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. PLEASE NOTE |
| THAT ANY AREAS WHERE THE PARKING LOT IS MODIFIED, TO |
| INCLUDE THE NORTHWEST AREA REQUIRES LANDSCAPE |
| COMPLIANCE AS WELL. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL VERIFY |
| COMPLIANCE BY GRAPHIC AND TABULAR MEANS, NOT JUST |
| "EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN". THE LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL |
| BE FULLY REVIEWED AS PART OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE |
| PERMIT. |
| |
| 6) THE GENERAL NOTES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN REFER TO |
| APPROVALS FROM NEW SMYRNA BEACH WHICH IS THE INCORRECT |
| JURISDICTION. |
| |
| 7) THE PARKING TABLE SHOWS THE CORRECT PARKING |
| REQUIREMENTS, BUT THE PARKING HAS BEEN INCORRECTLY |
| CALCULATED. PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN OF THE WAREHOUSE AND |
| OFFICE SPACE ON THE PLANS.. |
| |
| 9) THE PARKING SPACE STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT COMPLY |
| WITH THE CITY STANDARDS. THERE SHALL BE TWO (2) FEET |
| FROM THE BACK OF THE WHEEL STOP TO THE END OF THE |
| PARKING SPACE. ADDITIONALLY, THE CITY REQUIRES THAT THE |
| PARKING LOT STRIPES SHALL BE FOUR (4) INCHES WIDE AND |
| SEPARATED BY 12 INCHES. THIS SHALL BE SHOW ON THE |
| PARKING STRIPING DETAIL. |
| |
| 10) THE PLANS SHOW SABAL PALMS USED AS A PARKING LOT |
| ISLAND TREE, WHICH REQUIRES A GROUPING OF THREE PALM |
| TREES, NOT TWO PALM TREES. |
| |
| 11) THE TREE PLANTING DIAGRAM SHALL CLEARLY INDICATE |
| THAT THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL SHALL BE ABOVE THE |
| FINISHED GRADE. |
| |
| 12) THE TRASH ENCLOSURES DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE |
| CITY'S STANDARD DEPTH. PLEASE VERIFY THE ENCLOSURE SIZE |
| WITH THE CITY'S SANITATION DIVISION. |
| |
| 13) THE TRASH ENCLOSURE SHALL HAVE THE OPAQUE PANELS ON |
| THE GATE. |
| |
| CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
| |
2013-09-30 10:46:18 | 9/30/13 |