Date |
Text |
2013-07-29 10:27:14 | 2010 FBC |
| |
| DENIED BY BUILDING |
| |
| 1) SOME OF THE PROJECT INFORMATION ON SHEET A-1 OF THE |
| PLANS FROM ADVANCED DESIGN AND BUILDING IS INCORRECT. |
| BASED ON SECTION 310, THE OCCUPANCY TYPE IS R-3. |
| |
| 2) BASED ON SECTION 405 OF THE 2010 FBC EXISTING |
| BUILDING, THIS IS A LEVEL 3 ALTERATION AND NOT NEW |
| CONSTRUCTION. |
| |
| 3) THE EXPOSURE CATEGORY IS C PER FBC R301.2.1.4.3. |
| |
| 4) THE ROOF DEAD LOAD IS 25 PSF AND THE LIVE LOAD IS 30 |
| PSF PER TRUSS DRAWINGS AND ORIGINAL PLANS. FBC |
| R802.1.6.1 |
| |
| 5) THE ARCHITECTS SIGNATURE IS MISSING ON SHEET A-2 OF |
| ONE OF THE PLAN SETS. FAC 61G1-16 |
| |
| 6) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE PRODUCT EVALUATIONS FOR THE |
| ICYNENE SPRAY FOAM INSULATION. FBC R316 |
| |
| 7) PLEASE CLARIFY IF THIS WILL NOW BE AN UNVENTED ATTIC |
| ASSEMBLY WITH THE SPRAY FOAM IS APPLIED TO THE |
| UNDERSIDE OF THE ROOF AND REQUIRING THE ATTIC VENTING |
| TO BE SEALED. FBC R806.4 |
| |
| 8) PLEASE REVIEW THE NEW DOOR OPENING PRESSURES ON |
| SHEET A-1 TO DETERMINE IF THEY ARE CORRECT FOR 170 MPH |
| VULT / 132 MPH VASD WIND SPEED, EXPOSURE C WITH A 24.5 |
| FT MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. FBC R301.2.1 |
| |
| 9) PLEASE INDICATE THE REQUIRED OPENING PRESSURES FOR |
| ALL OF THE SECOND FLOOR SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS THAT ARE TO |
| BE REPLACED, ACCORDING TO THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS |
| PROJECT. FBC R301.2.1 |
| |
| 10) THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IS REQUIRED TO REVIEW AND |
| APPROVE THE PRODUCT APPROVALS IN WRITING PER CITY |
| AMENDMENTS 107.3.4.1. |
| |
| 11) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED INDICATE THAT THE |
| REPLACEMENT WINDOWS ARE NOT LARGE MISSILE IMPACT RATED. |
| PLEASE INDICATE THAT THERE IS EXISTING STORM PANELS OR |
| PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS AND INSTALLATION SCHEDULES |
| FOR THEM. FBC EXISTING BUILDING SECTION 606.4 AND DCA |
| RULE 9N-3. |
| |
| 12) SPECIFY WHICH OF THE APPROVED METHODS OF ATTACHMENT |
| LISTED IN THE HANSON CEMENT ROOF TILE, NOA #12-0917.07, |
| WILL BE USED TO INSTALL IT. IF A ROOF TILE ADHESIVE |
| WILL BE USED, PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF THE PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL PER FBC EXISTING BUILDING SECTION 611 AND DCA |
| RULE 9N-3. |
| |
| 13) PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR AN OUTSWING |
| DOOR WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 6' 8", AS WELL AS, ONE |
| WITH AN 8' DOOR HEIGHT. THE PLANS SPECIFY A DOOR WITH |
| AN 8' HEIGHT. PLEASE CLARIFY. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| |
| 14) PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH |
| OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. THIS WILL |
| HELP CUT DOWN ON PLAN REVIEW TIME. |
| |
| ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| (561)805-6714 |
| [email protected] |