Date |
Text |
2013-03-25 11:29:59 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| PERMIT: 13030406 |
| ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY # 104 |
| CONT: CHANDLIER CONSTRUCTION |
| CONTACT:JOHN CHANDLIER |
| TEL: (561)791-6934 |
| |
| 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W |
| * WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS |
| |
| 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 |
| COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, |
| SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS |
| OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| |
| 1ST REVIEW |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| NOTE THIS PERMIT IS WORK TO BE ACCOMPLISHED UNDER THE |
| LANDLORD ONLY BUT THERE ARE ISSUES TO BE WORKED OUT BY |
| BOTH THE TENANT AND LANDLORDAND TO WHICH THE LANDLORD |
| OR TENANT WILL TAKE RESPONSIBILITY. |
| |
| 1A) SHEET A-1.0 INDICATES THAT THIS TENANT SPACE IS NOT |
| CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. BARNES & NOBLE OCCUPIED THIS SPACE |
| A MERCANTILE OCCUPANCY. LA FITNESS IS PROPOSING TO |
| BECOME THE NEW TENANT, A A-3 OCCUPANCY. THE DESIGNER OF |
| RECORD WILL NEED TO REVIEW THE 2010 EXISTING BUILDING |
| CODE 901.3.1 FOR BUILDINGS THAT ARE UNDER GOING A |
| PARTIAL CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY, SECTION 912 WILL APPLY. |
| |
| 1B) SHEET A1-0 NOTE # 16 REFERENCE MINIMUM EXIT AISLES |
| OR CORRIDORS AND CODE REFERENCE 1017.2 FOR AISLES FOR |
| BUSINESS & MERCANTILE, THIS IS AN A-3 OCCUPANCY. PLEASE |
| CORECT. |
| |
| 1C) 1B) SHEET A1-0 NOTE # 17 REFERENCE THE MINIMUM |
| NUMBER OF EXITS REQUIRED AND REFERNCES TABLE 1019.1, NO |
| SUCH TABLE, SECTION 1019.1 IS FOR EGRESS BALCONIES. |
| |
| 1D) 1B) SHEET A1-0 NOTE # 18 REFERENCES THE NUMBER OF |
| EXITS PROVIDED AS THREE ACTUALLY ONLY TWO, THE FRONT |
| AND THE BACK, THE TWO VERTICAL EXITS DROP INTO THE SAME |
| EXIT PASSAGE WAY. |
| |
| 1E) SHEET A1-0 NOTE # 19 REFERENCES MAXIMUM PATH OF |
| TRAVEL, AND SECTION 1025.8 WHICH DEALS WITH HORIZONTAL |
| EXITS. |
| |
| 1F) 1B) SHEET A1-0 NOTE # 20 REFERENCES MAXIMUM DEAD |
| ENDS AND REFENECES SECTION # 1017 BUT IS AISLES. |
| |
| 2A) THE DESIGNER OF RECORD SHALL ELECT TO DESSIGN THIS |
| TENANT SPACE UNDER EITHER SECTION: |
| 912.1.1.1 CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION WITHOUT |
| SEPARATION. |
| 912.1.1.2 CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION WITH |
| SEPARATION. |
| |
| 3) ) 2010 EXST BLDG CODE 912.4.1 MEANS OF EGRESS FOR |
| CHANGE TO HIGHER HAZARD CATEGORY. |
| WHEN A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION IS MADE TO A |
| HIGHER HAZARD CATEGORY (LOWER NUMBER) AS SHOWN IN TABLE |
| 912.4, THE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE |
| REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 10 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| CODE, BUILDING. |
| |
| 4) THE MONUMENTAL STAIR IS NOW AN ISSUE (A-3 OCCUPANCY) |
| WHERE IT WAS NOT UNDER THE MERCANTILE OCCUPANCY. THE |
| EXCEPTION FOR MONUMENTAL STAIRS IS FOUND UNDER 708.2 |
| EXCEPTION # 7, THE MONUMENTAL STAIR NOT REQUIRED TO BE |
| PART OF THE MEANS OF EGRESS BECAUSE THERE WERE 2 |
| VERTICAL EXITS TO THE 2ND FLOOR. |
| |
| THE 2010 FBC-B SECTION 1028.2 REQUIRES 50 % OF THE |
| TOTAL OCCUPANTS TO EXIT THROUGH THE MAIN EXIT. 1028.3 |
| ASSEMBLY OTHER EXITS. EACH LEVEL OF AN ASSEMBLY |
| OCCUPANCY SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO A MAIN EXIT AND SHALL BE |
| PROVIDED WITH ADDITIONAL EXITS OF SUFFICIENT WIDTH TO |
| ACCOMMODATE ONE-HALF OF THE TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD SERVED |
| BY THAT LEVEL. SUCH ADDITIONAL EXITS SHALL BE LOCATED |
| AS FAR FROM THE MAIN ENTRANCE/EXIT AS PRACTICABLE. SUCH |
| EXITS SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE FROM A CROSS AISLE OR A SIDE |
| AISLE. PLEASE PROVIDE CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| IF THE MONUMENTAL STAIR WAS ENCLOSED ON BOTH FLOORS |
| WITH A ONE HOUR RATED ENCLOSURE IT WOULD THEN BECOME A |
| CODE COMPLIANT SET OF EXIT STAIRS, THEY WOULD NOT BE |
| REQUIRED TO GO TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING SINCE |
| THE 2 VERTICAL EXITS WOULD MEET THAT REQUIREMENT. DOORS |
| COULD BE LEFT IN THE OPEN POSITION IF THEY WERE TIED TO |
| MAG LOCKS AND THE FIRE ALARM. |
| |
| 5) THE LIFE SAFETY PLANS HAVE SERIOUS PROBLEMS SINCE |
| THE MONUMETAL STAIRS CAN NOT BE USED FOR EXITING AND |
| SINCE THE 2ND FLOOR OCCUPANT LOAD IS AT 500 OCCUPANTS, |
| NEITHER THE STAIRS NOR THE DOORS AT THE BACK OF THE |
| BUILDING WILL HANDLE THESE OCCUPANT LOADS. THE DESIGNER |
| IS TAKING A 36 INCH DOOR AND STATING 180 OCCUPANTS CAN |
| EXIT THIS OPENING, WHEREAS THE CLEAR OPENING IS CLOSER |
| TO 34 INCHES AND ONLY 170 OCCUPANTS CAN EXIT. FOR A |
| PAIR OF DOUBLE DOORS 340 OCCUPANTS. THE BACK OF HOUSE |
| SEERVICE CORRIDOR IS ALSO CONSIDERED A EXIT PASSAGEWAY |
| SINCE IT IS A CONTINUATION OF THE VERTICAL EXIT. MANY |
| OF THE DOORS IN THIS EXIT PASSAGEWAY DOORWAYS ARE NOT |
| WIDE ENOUGH FOR THE NEW ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES THAT NOW |
| EXIST. FOR EXAMPLE TO THE SOUTH THE SPACE WAS |
| ORIGINALLY DESIGN FOR MERCANTILE OCCUPANCY, THIS IS NOW |
| GOING TO BE A RESTRAUNT WITH DOUBLE THE OCCUPANT LOAD |
| OF HOW THE EXIT PASSAGE WAY WAS DESIGNED. THE SAME HOLD |
| TRUE JUST TO THE NORTH, A SECOND FLOOR NIGHTCLUB AND |
| THE SECONDARY EXIT THAT LEADS TO THE EXIT STAIRS. |
| PLEASE PROVIDE THE OCCUPANT LOADS THAT WILL SHARE THE |
| EXITING FOR THIS COMMON EXIT PASSAGE WAY. PLEASE NOTE |
| PART OF THE EXIT DISCHARGE A 4 FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK |
| AND STAIRS., THE STAIRS WILL ONLY ALLOW FOR 160 |
| OCCUPANTS. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LIFE SAFETY PLANS TO THE |
| PUBLIC WAY. |
| |
| 6) ANOTHER ISSUE THAT IS BORDER LINE IS THE OCCUPANT |
| LOAD ON THE SECOND FLOOR AND A THIRD REQUIRED STAIRWAY |
| 2010 FBC-B TABLE 1021.1 IF 501 OCCUPANTS ARE LOCATED ON |
| THE 2ND FLOOR THEN A THIRD REQUIRED EXIT STAIR WILL |
| ALSO BE REQUIRED. |
| |
| 7) ) THE PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE A SECTION THROUGH THE |
| MONUMENTAL STAIRWAY, PLEASE PROVIDE SUCH SECTION |
| PROVIDING DETAILS SUCH AS DRAFT CURTAIN AND SPRINKLER |
| LOCATION. |
| 2010 FBC-B 708.2 EXCEPTION 2.1. WHERE THE AREA OF THE |
| FLOOR OPENING BETWEEN STORIES DOES NOT EXCEED TWICE THE |
| HORIZONTAL PROJECTED AREA OF THE ESCALATOR OR STAIRWAY |
| AND THE OPENING IS PROTECTED BY A DRAFT CURTAIN AND |
| CLOSELY SPACED SPRINKLERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13. |
| IN OTHER THAN GROUPS B AND M, THIS APPLICATION IS |
| LIMITED TO OPENINGS THAT DO NOT CONNECT MORE THAN FOUR |
| STORIES. PLEASE NOTE THIS EXCEPTION IS ONLY FOR |
| BUSINESS & MERCANTILE, NOT FOR AN ASSEMBLY USE, PLEASE |
| PROVIDE HOW THIS CODE VIOLATION WILL BE COMPLIED. |
| |
| 8) SHEET # A-3.0 INDICATES A NEW ROOF CURB PLEASE |
| PROVIDE TTHE MANUFACTURES CUT SHEETS ON THE NEW ROOF |
| CURB FOR THIS WIND SPEED, 170 MPH V-ULT. |
| |
| 9A) THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN FL S. S. 553.71(7) " |
| THRESHOLD BUILDING" MEANING ANY BUILDING WHICH IS |
| GREATER THAN (3) STORIES OR 50 FT IN HEIGHT, OR WHICH |
| HAS AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AS DENIED IN |
| THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SQ FT IN |
| AREA AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT OF GREATER THAN 500 |
| PERSONS. |
| |
| 109.3.6.1 THE ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPECIAL |
| INSPECTOR TO PERFORM STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A |
| THRESHOLD BUILDING PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION |
| PLAN PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL |
| INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENFORCING |
| AGENCY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR |
| THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING. THE PURPOSE |
| OF THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO PROVIDE |
| SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO THAT |
| THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR COMPLIANCE |
| WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. |
| |
| 9B) THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: |
| WPB AMENDMENT 109.3.6.2 W.P.B. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES |
| DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS A SPECIAL |
| INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FL S S 553.79(5) FLORIDA |
| STATUTES TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THIS |
| CODE. |
| CONTACT KEN CONRAD MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR |
| PROGRAM AT (561)805-6666 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION |
| BEFORE THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. |
| |
| 9C) THRESHOLD BLDG, REQUIRED STATEMENT: |
| W.P.B. AMENDMENT 109.3.6.4.4 ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING |
| WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE |
| ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT |
| THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S PR ENGINEER'S |
| KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE |
| APPLICABLE FIRE-SAFETY STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE |
| LOCAL AUTHORITY IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND 633 FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| |
| 9D) A PLAN REVIEW STOP WILL BE PUT ON THIS PROJECT |
| UNTIL THESE ITEMS ARE COMPLETED AS REQUESTED BY THE |
| CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR KEN CONRAD: |
| |
| PLEASE CALL THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH?S AUTOMATED |
| TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS LINE (561) 805-6700) FOR |
| IN-PROGRESS INSPECTIONS FOR AUDITING OF JOBSITE |
| INSPECTIONS. |
| |
| 1) THE CONTRACTOR WILL PRODUCE A JOB SUMMARY OR HISTORY |
| FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. |
| THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD BY E-MAIL. KEN |
| CONRAD: [email protected] |
| |
| 2) FOR THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR PLEASE PROVIDE A RESUME' |
| OF INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECT. THE |
| RESUME' MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY ALL CERTIFICATES AS |
| SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE |
| WILL REVIEW THE RESUME'. AFTER THE RESUME' IS REVIEWED, |
| AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES |
| WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST |
| MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA. |
| CONTACT KEN CONRAD |
| TEL: 561-805-6666 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE |
| HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS |
| LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS |
| REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO |
| THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE |
| THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
| |
| MEMBER OF BOAF: BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF |
| FLORIDA SAVING LIVES AND PROPERTY SINCE 1953 |
| |
| |
| |
| |