Date |
Text |
2013-01-09 17:25:29 | FAILED |
| |
| 1) IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT THE SCOPE OF WORK IS FOR THIS |
| PERMIT. THE APPLICATION IS FOR "INTERIOR REMIX AND |
| RENOVATION" YET THE PLANS INCLUDE SITE WORK, PARKING |
| AND LANDSCAPING PLANS. SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED |
| FOR THE FOLLOWING: |
| |
| A. PARKING LOT, TO INCLUDE THE STRIPING. |
| B. LANDSCAPE WORK. NOTE ANY TREE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION |
| REQUIRES A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT. |
| C. SIGNAGE |
| D. FENCES AND GATES. |
| E. TRASH ENCLOSURES. |
| F. IRRIGATION. |
| |
| 2) THE PERMITS FOR EXTERIOR WORK WILL REQUIRE THE |
| SUBMITTAL OF TWO COPIES OF A RECENT SURVEY, LESS THAN |
| ONE YEAR OLD. |
| |
| 3) THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED COMMERCIAL PLANNED |
| DEVELOPMENT, SO ANY CHANGES TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE SITE |
| REQUIRE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. PLEASE CONTACT |
| THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR THE APPLICATION. |
| |
| 4) THE VALUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION ($650,000) EXCEEDS 50% |
| OF THE VALUE OF THE STRUCTURES ON-SITE ($996,730 ) |
| ACCORDING TO THE P.B.C. PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE; |
| THEREFORE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF THE |
| ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR), THE |
| LANDSCAPE ON THE SITE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL |
| APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE |
| ZLDR. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT |
| VERIFIES THAT THE SITE DOES NOT CONFORM TO ARTICLE XIV; |
| THEREFORE, PRIOR TO THE ZONING APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT |
| A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT AND IRRIGATION PERMIT SHALL |
| BE SUBMITTED SHOWING MATERIAL TO BRING THE SITE INTO |
| CONFORMITY. |
| |
| 5) THE PORTION OF THE PARKING LOT THAT IS BEING MILLED |
| AND OVERLAYED SHALL CONFORM TO ALL LANDSCAPE |
| REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| 6) THE PAVING AND GRADING PLAN SEEMS TO INDICATE THAT |
| THERE IS A PORTION OF A PARKING SPACE BEING CONSTRUCTED |
| WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED. |
| |
| 7) THE PARKING TABLE USES INCORRECT PARKING |
| REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE REFER TO ARTICLE XV OF THE ZONING |
| AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. |
| |
| 8) THE CITY REQUIRES THE USE OF SINGLE SIDED WHEEL |
| STOPS. |
| |
| 9) THE PARKING SPACE STRIPING DETAIL SHALL CALL OUT THE |
| WIDTH, COLOR AND SPACING OF ALL STRIPING. IT SHALL |
| COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S REQUIREMENTS. THE CURRENT SITE |
| STRIPING IS NOT IN CONFORMANCE WITH CITY CODE. |
| |
| 10) THE PLANS SEEM TO INDICATE THE REMOVAL OF |
| SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF LANDSCAPE, TO INCLUDE FOUNDATION |
| PLANTING FOR AT LEAST ONE BUILDING. THE LANDSCAPE |
| PERCENTAGE ON THE SITE MAY NOT BE REDUCED BELOW 15% AND |
| THE BUILDINGS MAY NOT HAVE THEIR REQUIRED FOUNDATION |
| PLANTING REDUCED. |
| |
| 11) THE LAURAL OAK TREE PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL APPEARS TO |
| BE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY AND THUS MAY NOT BE REMOVED |
| BY THIS PROPERTY OWNER. |
| |
| 12) THE SUBMITTED LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT COVER THE |
| ENTIRE SITE AND DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS |
| FOR A LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL BE FULLY |
| REVIEWED AS PART OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE PERMIT. |
| |
| 13) THE TRASH ENCLOSURES REQUIRE A 12.5 FOOT CLEAR |
| OPENING. |
| |
| 14) THE TRASH ENCLOSURE SHALL HAVE PERIMETER |
| LANDSCAPING. |
| |
| 15) NO DIMENSION LINES WERE INCLUDED ON THE ELEVATIONS |
| TO VERIFY THE HEIGHT OF THE NEW TOWER. |
| |
| 16) IS THERE ROOF MOUNTED A/C EQUIPMENT PROPOSED? IF SO |
| IT SHALL BE SCREENED. PLANS SHALL SHOW THE SCREENING. |
| |
| CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
2012-12-18 17:26:04 | 12/18/12 |