Plan Review Notes For Permit 12050314 |
Permit Number |
12050314 |
|
Review Stop |
Z |
Sequence Number |
1 |
|
Notes |
Date |
Text |
2012-05-16 11:07:57 | FAILED | | | | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE DRAINAGE | | EASEMENT RECORDED IN O.R.B 21881, PAGE 705, HAS BEEN | | RELEASED OR AMENDED TO NOT INCLUDE THE PROPOSED PATIO | | AREA. NOTE #5 ON THE SURVEY STATES THAT THE EASEMENT | | WILL BE RELEASED PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BRICK | | PAVER PATIO. IN THE ABSENCE OF THE EASEMENT RELEASE, NO | | STRUCTURE MAY BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE EASEMENT. | | | | 2) THE SCREEN ENCLOSURE PLANS SHOW THE ENCLOSURE AT 13 | | FEET WIDE AND INDICATE THAT THE SCREEN ENCLOSURE WILL | | BE BUILT ON THE PROPERTY LINE. THE MARKED UP SURVEY | | SHOWS THE SCREEN ENCLOSURE BUILT IN LINE WITH THE | | PATIO, APPROXIMATELY ONE (1) FOOT FROM THE WESTERN LOT | | LINE LINE. IN EITHER CASE, THE ADDITIONAL FOOT IN WIDTH | | WILL AFFECT THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE. IF IT IS TO BE ONLY | | THE LANDSCAPE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ENCLOSURE, THEN | | IT MAY BE FIELD ADJUSTED. IF IT IS TO BE ON THE WEST | | PROPERTY LINE, THEN THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL | | BE REVISED TO SHOW THE RELOCATION OF THE PODOCARPUS | | HEDGE WHICH IS CURRENTLY SHOWN BETWEEN LOTS 72 AND 73. | | BOTH THE SITE PLAN AND ENGINEERING PLAN SHALL SHOW THE | | SAME CONDITIONS. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 822-1446. | 2012-05-11 10:40:59 | GIVEN TO ES |
|