Date |
Text |
2012-05-11 15:47:34 | 2010 FBC |
| |
| DENIED BY BUILDING |
| |
| 1) PLANS REFERENCE THE 2010 FBC. THE PERMIT WAS APPLIED |
| FOR ON 1/19/2O12 WHICH WAS PRIOR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION |
| DATE OF THE 2010 FBC AND ASCE 7- 10 ON 3/15/20102. THE |
| 2007 FBC W2009 REVISIONS WAS THE CODE IN EFFECT AT THE |
| TIME OF APPLICATION. BECAUSE THE PLANS WERE HELD UP IN |
| ZONING AND NOT SENT TO BUILDING DEPT. UNTIL AFTER THE |
| CODE CHANGE IF YOU CHOOSE TO DO SO THE APPLICATION DATE |
| CAN BE CHANGED TO ALLOW DESIGN UNDER THE 2010 CODE PER |
| ROBERT BROWN. |
| |
| 2) BECAUSE THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE IS LOCATED WITHIN |
| 1500 FEET OF THE INTER-COASTAL WATERWAY THE EXPOSURE |
| CATEGORY IS C AND THE WIND SPEED FOR WEST PALM BEACH IS |
| 170 MPH UNDER THE 2010 CODE AND 140 UNDER THE 2007 |
| CODE. PLEASE REVISE. |
| |
| 3) THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRESSURES SPECIFIED ON |
| THE PLANS ARE TOO LOW. FBC R301.2.1 PLEASE REVISE. |
| |
| 4) THE FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONS ON A2.1 DO NOT HAVE |
| ALL OF THE WINDOWS AND DOORS TAGGED TO CORRESPOND WITH |
| THE WINDLOAD SCHEDULE. R301.2.1 |
| |
| 5) THE BOTTOM OF ALL EXTERIOR FOOTERS ARE REQUIRED BY |
| FBC R403.1.4 TO BE AT LEAST 12 INCHES BELOW THE GROUND |
| SURFACE. THE SOIL REPORT SUBMITTED RECOMMENDS 16" TO |
| 24" BELOW THE FINISHED PAD OR MONOLITHIC SLAB. |
| |
| 6) FBC R404.1.6 REQUIRES THE FOUNDATION TO EXTEND A |
| MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE ADJACENT |
| TO THE FOUNDATION. |
| |
| 7) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R310 FOR THE REQUIRED |
| EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS. THE SECOND FLOOR |
| BEDROOMS DO NOT COMPLY. PLEASE CLARIFY "EH" TAG SHOWN |
| AT THE WINDOWS ON THE FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONS ON |
| A2.1. |
| |
| 8) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE PLAN |
| SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R401.3. |
| |
| 9) SPECIFY THE BOLTS FOR THE 2 X 4 AND 2 X 6 |
| ATTACHMENTS TO THE CONCRETE BEAM FOR THE LOWER ROOF |
| SHOWN ON WALL SECTION 3 ON A4.2. FBC R301.1 |
| |
| 10) WALL SECTION 5 ON SHEET A4.2 IS MIS-LABELED. IT IS |
| A SECTION AT THE PATIO NOT THE GARAGE. CITY AMENDMENTS |
| 107.2.1 |
| |
| 11) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R502.1.2 FOR DRAFTSTOPPING |
| AT THE FLOOR CEILING ASSEMBLY NOT TO EXCEED 1000 SQFT. |
| |
| 12) THERE IS NO F1 FOOTER SHOWN IN THE SCHEDULE ON |
| SHEET S1.1 FOR THE C1 COLUMN PAD SHOWN ON THE |
| FOUNDATION PLAN. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| |
| 13) PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE 2 X 4 AND 2 X 6 INTERIOR |
| BEARING WALLS. FBC R301.1 |
| |
| 14) SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS THAT WILL BE USED AT THE TOP |
| AND BOTTOM OF THE 6 X 6 WOOD COLUMNS. FBC R301.1 |
| |
| 15) PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE BUILT- UP (3) 2X 6 WOOD |
| COLUMN. FBC R301.1 |
| |
| 16) PROVIDE THE MISSING STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR COLUMN |
| C-5 IN THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1.1. FBC R301.1 |
| |
| 17) PLEASE CLARIFY THE NOTE AT THE GARAGE ON SHEET S1.1 |
| FOR THE 16" X 16" STRIP FOOTING. A TE 2 18" X 12" |
| FOOTING IS SHOWN. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| |
| 18) ON SHEET S1.2 THE TAGS FOR THE BEAMS ON THE PLAN |
| ARE B-1 AND B-2 AND IN THE SCHEDULE THEY ARE BM-1 AND |
| BM-2. PLEASE CORRECT. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| |
| 19) THE NOTE ON SHEET S1.3 SPECIFIES 8D COMMON NAILS |
| FOR FASTENING THE ROOF SHEATHING . FBC R803.2.3.1 |
| REQUIRES RING SHANK NAILS. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| |
| 2O) THE ROOF PRESSURE AND WALL PRESSURE CHARTS ON S1.3 |
| ARE MISSING THE PRESSURES. FBC R301.2.1 |
| |
| 21) THERE ARE NOT ANY WOOD TO WOOD CONNECTORS SPECIFIED |
| IN THE SCHEDULE ON S1.3 FOR THE 6 X 12 WOOD BEAM TO |
| RAFTERS AT THE PATIO. PLEASE CORRECT. FBC R301.1 |
| |
| 22) THE PLANS APPEAR TO SHOW A NON-VENTED ATTIC WITH |
| R-20 INSULATION AND THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SPECIFY A |
| R-30 VENTED ATTIC. PLEASE CORRECT. CITY AMENDMENTS |
| 107.2.1 |
| |
| 23) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE |
| SPRAY FOAM INSULATION THAT WILL BE USED IN THE |
| NON-VENTED ATTIC. FBC R316.3 |
| |
| 24) THE FORM THAT WAS SUBMITTED 1100A-08 CAN NOT BE |
| USED WITH THE 2010 FBC. SEE FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| SECTION 405.4. |
| |
| 25) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED |
| AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. CITY |
| AMENDMENTS 107.3.4.1 |
| |
| 26) SEVERAL OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE BEEN |
| SUPERSEDED OR EXPIRED PRIOR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF |
| THE 2010 FBC. PLEASE REVIEW ALL TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE |
| CURRENT. DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| |
| 27) THE TRUSS DRAWING THAT WERE SUBMITTED SPECIFY THE |
| 2007 FBC AND ASCE 7-05 WITH A 140 MPH WIND SPEED. TO |
| CORRESPOND WITH PLANS DESIGNED TO THE 2010 FBC, THE |
| TRUSSES WILL NEED TO DESIGNED TO THE 2010 FBC AND ASCE |
| 7-10 WITH A 170 MPH WIND SPEED. PLEASE CORRECT. CITY |
| AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| |
| 28) SPECIFY THE ROOF & FLOOR TRUSS DESIGN LIVE AND DEAD |
| LOADS ON THE PLANS. FBC R301.1 |
| |
| 29) THE TRUSS DESIGN LOADS OF THE TRUSSES WILL HAVE TO |
| MATCH THE ROOF AND FLOOR LIVE AND DEAD LOADS SPECIFIED |
| ON THE PLANS. FBC R802.10.1 |
| |
| 30) THE TRUSS LAYOUT FROM THE TRUSS COMPANY NEEDS TO BE |
| SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE TRUSS ENGINEER AND REVIEWED |
| AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THE |
| STRUCTURE. FS 471 AND CITY AMENDMENTS 107.1 |
| |
| 31) NOTE: TRUSS DRAWINGS FOR ONE AND TWO FAMILY |
| DWELLINGS DO NOT HAVE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW. |
| THEY CAN BE PROVIDED TO THE FIELD INSPECTOR AT THE ROOF |
| FRAMING INSPECTION. |
| |
| 32) NOTE: IN ORDER TO SPEED REVIEW TIME, PLEASE PROVIDE |
| A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW THE REVIEW COMMENTS |
| WERE ADDRESSED. |
| |
| ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| (561)805-6714 |
| [email protected] |