| Date |
Text |
| 2010-11-17 15:28:49 | FAILED |
| | |
| | 1) THE EXTENSION OF SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE, WHICH FORMS |
| | THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE, RESULTS IN THE |
| | PROPERTY HAVING NONCONTIGUOUS RIPARIAN RIGHTS. SECTION |
| | 94-304(E)(2)A.2 OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS DOES NOT PERMIT DOCKS FOR PROPERTIES NORTH |
| | OF GREENWOOD DRIVE WITH NON-CONTIGUOUS RIPARIAN RIGHTS; |
| | THEREFORE, THE STAFF MAY NOT GRANT ZONING APPROVAL OF |
| | THE DOCK. |
| | |
| | 2) IF THE PROHIBITION LISTED IN #1 IS SOLVED, THEN A |
| | UNITY OF TITLE WITH THE PROPERTY AT 113 GREENWOOD DRIVE |
| | IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ZONING APPROVAL SINCE DOCKS ARE |
| | ONLY ALLOWED AS ACCESSORY TO A RESIDENTIAL USE AND NOT |
| | AS THE PRIMARY USE ON A PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 3) IF THE PROHIBITION LISTED IN #1 IS SOLVED, THEN A |
| | CLASS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL BY THE CITY |
| | COMMISSION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ZONING APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 4) IF THE PROHIBITION LISTED IN #1 IS SOLVED, THEN THE |
| | DEP APPROVAL SHALL BE LESS THAN 2 YEARS OLD AND SHOW |
| | THE SAME CONDITION AS THE DOCK SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 5) THE DOCK SHALL BE SHOWN TO SCALE ON THE SURVEY TO |
| | VERIFY THAT IT IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE RIPARIAN |
| | PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 6) THE SURVEY SHOWS THE PROPERTY WIDTH AT 127 FEET, YET |
| | THE DOCK PLAN ACCOUNTS FOR ONLY A TOTAL OF 126 FEET IN |
| | WIDTH. |
| | |
| | 7) THE PLANS STATE THE DOCK WILL HAVE A DIMENSION OF 56 |
| | FEET X 60 FEET, YET SHOWS IT AT 5 FEET X 60 FEET. |
| | |
| | 8) THE DEP APPROVAL WAS ONLY FOR A DOCK EXTENDING 50 |
| | FEET, YET THE PLANS SHOW A DOCK EXTENDING 70 FEET. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
| | |
| | |
