Date |
Text |
2010-07-30 17:06:42 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** |
| |
| PLEASE RESPOND TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| |
| 1. REPEAT COMMENT: PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-448 (D), THE |
| LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL CONTAIN ALL OF THE ITEMS |
| ENUMERATED IN THIS SECTION. THE PLAN SHOULD SHOW ALL |
| UTILITIES, FENCES, SITE LIGHTING AND THE LANDSCAPED |
| PARKING AREA IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THIS BUILDING. THE |
| PLANT LIST SHALL SHOW THE SIZE AND SPACING OF ALL |
| PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL AND NOT JUST THE CONTAINER |
| SIZE. |
| |
| 2. REPEAT COMMENT: LANDSCAPING, IRRIGATION AND PAVING |
| REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS. FOR THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT, |
| PLEASE PROVIDE A CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE THAT INCLUDES |
| THE TOTAL COST OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS AND LABOR, |
| BROKEN DOWN INTO UNIT COST. YOUR REPLY STATED THAT THIS |
| WAS ATTACHED, BUT WE COULD NOT LOCATE IT. THE |
| IRRIGATION IS NOT EXISTING --IT WAS REMOVED. AN |
| IRRIGATION PERMIT WITH TWO SETS OF IRRIGATION PLANS |
| MEETING CITY REQUIREMENTS IS REQUIRED |
| |
| 3. AN INSUFFICIENT AMOUNT OF GREEN SPACE WAS PROVIDED |
| IN THE NEW PATIO ARE TO SUPPORT THE PROPOSED PALMS AND |
| HEDGE. THERE SHALL BE LESS PATIO AND MORE LANDSCAPED |
| AREA. |
| |
| 4; THERE IS AN EXISTING TREE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF |
| THE BUILDING THAT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAN OR THE TREE |
| ALTERATION PERMIT. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| |
| 5. THE LANDSCAPE AND SITE CHANGES REQUIRE A MINOR PD |
| AMENDMENT THROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING PRIOR TO APPROVAL |
| OF ANY PERMITS. |
| |
| 6. PROVIDE MORE DETAIL OF WHAT IS GOING ON ALONG THE |
| WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. THE WALL AROUND THE STORAGE |
| AREA IS REQUIRED TO BE SCREENED BY A HEDGE. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT |
| KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462. |