Date |
Text |
2010-06-17 15:34:46 | FAILED |
| |
| 1) PROVIDE A RECENT SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY TO BE |
| INCLUDED WITH THE SIGN PERMIT. |
| |
| 2) THE PROPOSED SIGN IS NOT SHOWN TO CORRECT SCALE ON |
| SITE PLAN. THE BASE AND THE PROJECTION SHALL BE SHOWN |
| AT THEIR ACCURATE DIMENSIONS. NOTE: THE FURTHEST |
| PROJECTION OF THE SIGN, NOT THE BASE REQUIRES THE |
| MINIMUM FIVE FOOT SETBACK. |
| |
| 3) PROVIDE THE SETBACKS FROM THE PARKING AND THE |
| DRIVEWAY. |
| |
| 4) THE NEW SIGN LOCATION REQUIRES AN AMENDMENT TO THE |
| APPROVED SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. BOTH THE SITE AND |
| LANDSCAPE PLANS WERE DESIGNED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE |
| EXISTING SIGN. THE AMENDMENT APPLICATION MAY BE |
| DOWNLOADED FROM THE CITY'S WEB SITE. THE AMENDMENT |
| REQUIRES A $300 APPLICATION FEE AS WELL AS REVISED |
| PLANS. |
| |
| 5) THE PROPOSED SIGN CONFLICTS WITH AN EXISTING OAK |
| TREE. NO ELEMENT OF THE SIGN SHALL BE CLOSER THAN 15 |
| FEET FROM THE TRUNK OF THE TREE. |
| |
| 6) ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY THAT IS ON |
| FILE WITH THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT, THE |
| PROPOSED SIGN BASE, INCLUDING FOOTERS, IS LOCATED ON A |
| 4 INCH FORCE MAIN. THE SIGN MAY NOT BE CONSTRUCTED ON |
| THE FORCE MAIN. |
| |
| 7) THE SIGN IS PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED WITHIN A 15 FOOT |
| UTILITY EASEMENT. SIGNS ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHIN |
| UTILITY EASEMENTS. |
| |
| 8) SIGN CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT. THE SIGN FACE IS 20 |
| FEET X 10 FEET = 200 SQ. FT. PLUS THE DECORATIVE TRIM |
| (#6 ON THE ENGINEER PLANS) WHICH HOUSE THE STREET |
| ADDRESS. THE SQ. FT. OF THE DECORATIVE TRIM AREA NEEDS |
| TO BE INCLUDED. |
| |
| 9) THE TOTAL SIGN ALLOWANCE IS 197.2 SQ. FT. THIS |
| INCLUDES BOTH FACES; THEREFORE, EACH FACE MAY ONLY BE |
| 98.6 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE. |
| |
| 10) PROVIDE THE SQ. FT. OF THE TIME AND TEMPERATURE |
| SIGN. IT MAY BE NO MORE THAN 25 PERCENT OF THE SIGN |
| FACE. |
| |
| CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER (561) 822-1446. |
| |
| |