Plan Review Notes For Permit 10060022 |
Permit Number |
10060022 |
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
Sequence Number |
1 |
|
Notes |
Date |
Text |
2010-08-09 11:15:25 | PLAN REVIEWER: DEAN LAUDERMILK, PROJECT COORDINATOR | | PHONE: 494-1083 | | FAX: 494-1116 | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | PLAN STATUS: FAILED | | 1. THE PLAN HAS BEEN TURNED DOWN FOR THE REASONS LISTED | | BELOW. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE OWNER MEET WITH THE | | UTILITY OWNERS WHO ARE LOCATED IN THE EASEMENT TO SEE | | IF THE EASEMENT CAN BE REDUCED IN SIZE. | | IF ALLOWED, THEN THERE IS A FORM ON OUR WEB PAGE THAT | | WILL NEED TO BE FILLED OUT AND SUBMITTED TO PLANNING. | | OUR WEB PAGE ADDRESS IS; | | HTTP://WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/ENG_FORMS.PHP AND THE | | FORM NAME IS "APPLICATION FOR ABANDONMENT OF EASEMENT". | | THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH DOES NOT USE THIS EASEMENT | | AND AS SUCH WILL NOT APPOSE REDUCING THE EASEMENT SIZE. | | A. NO STRUCTURES CAN BE BUILT IN OR OVER A UTILITY | | EASEMENT, AS OUTLINED IN THE PLAT. | | B. THE PLAN IS FAILED UNTIL THE EASEMENT IS REDUCED IN | | SIZE OR THE PLAN IS RESUBMITTED WITH ALL IMPROVEMENTS | | OUTSIDE OF THE EASEMENT, INCLUDING FOOTERS, WALLS, AND | | OVERHANGS. | | 2. ADDITIONALLY TWO OF THE UTILITIES DID NOT CIRCLE | | "APPROVED" ON THEIR FORMS. THE ATT AND COMCAST FORMS | | NEED TO BE RESUBMITTED IF USED. | | |
|