| Date |
Text |
| 2010-06-17 14:05:35 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | COMMENT FROM 10040770: |
| | |
| | |
| | 2. CALCULATIONS STATE THAT THE SF/FASTENER IS 1.02'; |
| | PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THIS NUMBER HAS BEEN DERIVED AS I |
| | BELIEVE THIS SHOULD BE .88'. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, THIS HAS BEEN REVISED TO .975FT / FASTENER. |
| | THANK YOU FOR YOUR RESPONSE LETTER WHICH CLARIFIES HOW |
| | YOU OBTAINED THIS NUMBER. HOWEVER, PLEASE SEE RAS117 |
| | SECTION 10.4.2. THIS CALCULATION REQUIRES FOR A SQUARE |
| | TO BE USED IN THE CALCULATIONS TO DETERMINE SQUARE FOOT |
| | / FASTENER (AND THEN FASTENER VALUE BASED ON SF PER |
| | FASTENER). USING 9.75 SQUARE FEET RATHER THAN 100 |
| | SQUARE FEET APPEARS TO RESULT IN AN "INCORRECT" (BASED |
| | ON RAS 117 REQUIREMENTS) AREA PER FASTENER, RESULTING |
| | IN A HIGHER FASTENER VALUE. |
| | |
| | 4. SEE RAS117, SPACING IS TO BE ROUNDED DOWN TO THE |
| | NEAREST INCH. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, ZONE 2 OK AS FASTENING WAS ROUNDED DOWN |
| | (RAS 117 REQUIREMENT 8.23, ARCHITECT CALCULATED 8.9 BUT |
| | SPECIFIED 8"). |
| | |
| | ZONE 3, ARCHITECT CALCULATED 5.92 TO BE ROUNDED UP TO |
| | 6", BUT RAS 117 REQUIREMENT FOR TWO FIELD ROWS IS 5.46 |
| | TO BE ROUNDED DOWN TO 5", DOES NOT COMPLY WITH DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT IT IS NOT NECESSARY (AND IS CONFUSING) |
| | TO SPECIFY ROW SPACING. PLEASE SEE NOAS; TO MY |
| | KNOWLEDGE, NONE SPECIFY ROW SPACING AS THEY SHOULD BE |
| | EVENLY SPACED. FOR INSTANCE, SEE SPECIFICATION FOR ZONE |
| | 2 (3 ROWS 12" APART SPECIFIED). AS THE BASE SHEET IS |
| | 39.37" WITH A 4" LAP, THE THREE ROWS SHOULD BE |
| | INSTALLED AT 11.79" APART, WHICH IS A PART OF THE |
| | RAS117 CALCULATION TO DETERMINE FASTENER SPACING |
| | (RAS117 10.4.5). THIS INFORMATION IS NOT NECESSARY (AS |
| | IT IS NOT SPECIFIED IN WRITTEN APPROVED ASSEMBLIES IN |
| | THE NOAS) BUT IF INCLUDED SHOULD BE CORRECT IN ORDER TO |
| | AVOID CONFUSION OR FAILED INSPECTIONS IN THE FIELD . |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME TO DISCUSS. AS DISCUSSED |
| | WITH CONTRACTOR, THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH |
| | PROVISO. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
