| Date |
Text |
| 2010-03-10 11:05:28 | REVIEWER: DEAN LAUDERMILK, PROJECT COORDINATOR, |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | EMAIL: [email protected], DIRECT PHONE: (561) |
| | 494-1083, FAX: (561) 494-1116. |
| | 1. STRIPING: |
| | A. SHOW STRIPPED PEDESTRIAN CROSS WALK AT BANYAN AND |
| | FLAGLER. |
| | B. NO DETAILS SUPPLIED FOR PARKING SPACES OR ADA |
| | REQUIREMENTS. I HAVE ATTACHED A COPY TO THE PLAN. |
| | C. SUGGEST RELOCATING THE ADA PARKING SPOTS NEXT TO THE |
| | EXIT. A DELINEATED PATH (BLUE THERMOPLASTIC) NEEDS TO |
| | BE USED TO A SIDEWALK. |
| | D. A DELINEATED PATH (BLUE THERMOPLASTIC) NEEDS TO BE |
| | USED TO A SIDEWALK/RAMP FOR ALL OF THE NORTH ADA |
| | PARKING SPACES. |
| | 2. SIGNAGE: |
| | A. REMOVE STOP SIGN AT EXIT AT BANYAN, THIS IS A |
| | TRAFFIC LIGHT REGULATED INTERSECTION. |
| | B. INSTALL NO PARKING SIGNS IN FRONT OF THE |
| | DUMPSTER(S). |
| | 3. PAVING: |
| | A. WHERE WILL THE STRIPING START? I WOULD SUGGEST ABOUT |
| | TWO FEET OUT INTO FLAGLER AT BANYAN. THE AREA WILL NEED |
| | TO BE GROUND DOWN SO THE PAVEMENT CAN START WITH OUT |
| | "FEATHERING". YOU SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY MAGNETIC LOOPED WIRES IN THE PAVEMENT IN THIS |
| | AREA. CAUTION NEEDS TO BE USED WHEN SAW CUTTING SO THE |
| | LINES ARE NOT CUT. OTHERWISE THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL WILL |
| | NOT WORK. |
| | B. PLAN DOES NOT SHOW HOW THE PAVEMENT WILL DRAIN. NO |
| | "BIRD BATHS" WILL BE ALLOWED. |
| | 4. LANDSCAPE PLAN: |
| | A. NO IRRIGATION PLAN SUBMITTED. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING |
| | THAT THE CONTRACTOR HAS ALREADY HOOKED UP TO THE CITY |
| | SPECIAL EVENTS METER. THIS CONNECTION NEEDS TO BE |
| | REMOVED. THERE IS AN EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM SERVING |
| | THE WHOLE SITE, THE 2" METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTER ARE |
| | LOCATED NEXT TO THE DUMPSTER. THIS SERVICE HAS BEEN |
| | DISCONTINUED BY THE OWNER BACK IN FEBRUARY 2009 AND |
| | NEEDS TO REACTIVATED. CALL PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER |
| | SERVICE AT 822-1300 FOR THE FEES REQUIRED. |
| | B. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT COVER THE LANDSCAPE |
| | REQUIRED AROUND THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. THIS IS |
| | UNDERSTANDABLE, SINCE THERE IS NO DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, |
| | ONE IS REQUIRED, AS WELL AS THE LANDSCAPING. |
| | 5. FIRE DEPT. ISSUES: |
| | A. NORMALLY AT LEAST ONE OF THE ENTRANCE/EXIT LANES |
| | NEEDS TO BE 20' WIDE LANE FOR ACCESS FOR A FIRE TRUCK, |
| | THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAN. |
| | B. NORMALLY NO PARKING IS ALLOWED IN FRONT OF AN FDC |
| | AND HYDRANT. IN FRONT OF THE DOCK THERE IS |
| | A CONFLICT, THE PARKING NEEDS TO BE TAKEN OUT AND |
| | MARKED "FIRE LANE", ALSO THE HYDRANT AND FDC NEED TO BE |
| | SHOWN. |
| | C. THOUGH NOT CALLED OUT THIS FACILITY WILL BE GATED. A |
| | "KNOX BOX" SET UP SHOULD BE REQUIRED. |
| | D. YOU WILL NEED TO DISCUSS THE ABOVE ISSUES WITH THE |
| | FIRE MARSHALL AND THEY WILL NEED TO REVIEW IT FOR OTHER |
| | ISSUES, SUCH AS THE DESIGNATED "FIRE LANES". |
| | E. THERE IS A "FIRE LANE" ACCESS ON THE NORTH END OF |
| | THIS PARKING LOT, THRU THE CONDO TO THE DOCKS. I |
| | BELIEVE THIS AREA SHOULD BE STRIPED AND MARKED "FIRE |
| | LANE, NO PARKING" SINCE IT IS THE FIRE LANES ACCESS TO |
| | YOUR DOCKS. I SAW TWO TRUCKS PARKED IN THIS AREA TODAY |
| | BLOCKING THE ACCESS. |
| | |
| | |
