Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 10010061
Permit Number 10010061
Review Stop ENG
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2010-02-03 15:23:47ENGINEERING REVIEWER:
 DEAN S. LAUDERMILK, PROJECT COORDINATOR
 PHONE: 561-494-1083, FAX: 561-494-1116
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 1ST REVIEW, FAILED.
  
 GENERAL COMMENTS:
 1. CITY ENGINEERING APPROVED MATERIALS LIST (AML) NEEDS
 TO BE USED WHENEVER MATERIALS USED ARE LISTED IN THE
 MANUAL. SUCH ITEMS INCLUDE THE 12" LINE AND THE 4" LINE
 AND WALL SLEEVES. THE AML CAN BE FOUND AT
 HTTP://WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/ENG_FORMS.PHP , IT IS
 THE SEVENTH FORM LISTED.
  
 SHEET 5:
 1. PIPE PENETRATIONS ARE TO HAVE WALL SLEEVES USED.
 1-A. THE NEW 12" LINE GOING THRU THE NEW RECEIVING TANK
 AND INTO THE WETWELL WILL NEED TO USE THE SLEEVES.
 1-B. SO WILL THE 4" DRAIN LINE.
 1-C. THE TWO DUMP LINES (4 AND 3" INTO THE NEW
 RECEIVING TANK WILL NEED WALL SLEEVES ALSO.
 1-D. THE 12" LINE AND THE 4" LINE PENETRATION WILL NEED
 TO HAVE HOLES CORED INTO THE WETWELL. THE HOLES WILL
 NEED TO BE 4" (MINIMUM) LARGER THAN THE OUTSIDE OF THE
 SLEEVES USED. THE SIZE OF THE HOLES LISTED WILL NOT
 WORK.
 2. "PROPOSED CURB DRAIN" IS SHOWN AT THE RIGHT SIDE OF
 THE PLAN:
 2-A. IT APPEARS TWO ARE SHOWN, BUT WHERE ARE THE PIPES
 THAT DRAIN FROM THEM? THERE ARE NO DETAILS FOR THE CURB
 DRAINS, DO YOU MEAN TO BUILD A CURB WITH FLUMES THRU
 THE CURBS? THIS IS TOTALLY UNCLEAR. SEE 2-B
 2-B. CROSS SECTION ON SHEET 5, B/S7 SHOWS THE CONCRETE
 SLAB, EAST OF THE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY IS TO BE THE SAME
 ELEVATION AS THE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY, WHY NOT RAISE UP
 THE EAST SLAB SO IT IS LEVEL WITH THE TOP OF THE CURB,
 THEN NO FLUMES WOULD BE NEEDED AND THE SLAB EAST OF THE
 CURBS WILL DRAIN ACROSS THE CURBS.
 3. THE NOTE "SLOPE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD AND REPAIRED
 ASPHALT PAVEMENT TOWARDS PROPOSED ROADWAY DRAIN. THERE
 IS NO APPARENT ASHPHALT, EXCEPT TO THE EAST OF THE
 CONSTRUCTION. WHERE THE ARROW IS POINTING IS ALL NEW
 CONCRETE. CALL OUT WHERE ANY NEW ASPHALT IS TO BE
 INSTALLED.
 4. A HOSE BIB IS SHOWN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE NEW
 RECEIVING TANK, I WOULD SUGGEST ANOTHER BE INSTALLED
 WHERE THE LINE IS TIED BACK IN NEAR THE WETWELL. ALSO,
 THE HOSE BIB(S) WILL BE SIGNED "NON-POTABLE WATER"
 SINCE IT IS ON THE PROCESS WATER LINE, CORRECT?
 5. 2 - 3" 90 DEGREE BENDS ARE SHOWN ON THE RELOCATED
 PROCESS WATER LINE. ON SHEET 6 THE ELBOWS SHOWN ARE 45
 DEGREE BENDS. WHICH IS IT? IF THE ELBOWS ON SHEET 6 ARE
 THE EXISITNG, WHERE ARE THE NEW 90 DEGREE BENDS AND
 THREE WOULD NEED TO BE USED, NOT TWO AS SHOWN.
  
 SHEET 6:
 1. THE ROUTING OF THE NEW 3" WATER LINE IS NOT SHOWN,
 HOW WILL THE LINE BE OFFSET DOWN WITH 1 - 90 DEGREE
 BEND AND THEN EAST WITH 1 - 90 DEGREE BEND TO THE EAST,
 AND NOT HAVE IT CONFLICT WITH THE 12" AND 4" DRAIN
 LINES?
  
 SHEET 7:
 1. THE SECONDARY POUR IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TANK SHOULD
 END AT THE SAME ELEVATION AS THE INVERT OF THE 12" LINE
 LEAVING THE TANK, NOT AS SHOWN. ALSO, SEE COMMENT 1-A
 FOR SHEET 5 THE SLEEVE WILL SET THE INVERT OF THE 12"
 HIGHER.
 2. A PREFORMED WATER STOP AND KEY WAY IS PROPOSED WHERE
 THE 12" LINE EXITS THE TANK, THIS WILL NOT WORK, THE
 KEYWAY WILL NEED TO BE ABOVE THE WATER STOP. EITHER
 LOWER THE BOTTOM SLAB, OR RAISE THE 12" PIPE.
 3. A 1/4" THICK ALUMIUM DIMOND PLATE IS TO BE USED TO
 COVER THE TANK. WILL THIS BE SAFE ENOUGH FOR A PERSON
 TO WALK ON?
  
 SHEET 8:
 1. A WALL SLEEVE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE WALL
 PENETRATION. THE HOLE FOR THE 8" PIPE WILL NEED TO BE
 LARGE THAN WHAT IS CALLED OUT (12").
  
 ADDITIONAL NOTES:
 PLUMBING REVIEW K. STEVENS FAILED PLAN DUE TO THE
 DUMPSTER PAD IS NOT ROOFED AND THE CATCH BASIN DRAINS
 INTO THE SEPTAGE WETWELL. I EXPLAINED THAT WE CAN NOT
 ALLOW THE FLUIDS TO DRAIN INTO A STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM,
 BUT THAT THEY NEED TO GO BACK INTO THE TREATMENT CYCLE,
 INCLUDING ANY RAIN WATER COLLECTED. HE SHOULD BE
 CHANGING THIS COMMENT, BUT, YOU MAY WANT TO CONTACT HIM
 DIRECTLY.
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved