Date |
Text |
2010-03-24 15:29:42 | FAILED |
| |
| 1) THE MINOR AMENDMENT FOR THE LANDSCAPE REVISIONS HAS |
| NOT BEEN APPROVED BY ZONING. ZONING WILL NOT APPROVE |
| THIS PERMIT UNTIL THE MINOR AMENDMENT IS APPROVED. |
| |
| 2) THERE HAVE BEEN MANY PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE |
| APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. LISTED BELOW ARE THE |
| IDENTIFIED CHANGES AND STAFF'S DISPOSITION TO THE |
| CHANGES BASED ON THE 3/22/10 MEETING: |
| |
| A. THE SABAL PALMS W/UNDER PLANTING REQUIRED TO PROVIDE |
| ADDITIONAL BUFFERING AGAINST ANDROS ILES NORTH OF THE |
| MULCH PATH HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED. THESE BUFFERS WERE |
| REQUIRED AS PART OF THE PROJECT APPROVAL. 3/22/10 |
| MEETING AGREEMENT - SLASH PINE TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED |
| WITH AN UNDER PLANTING OF SAW PALMETTO AND FAKAHATCHEE |
| GRASS AS SHOWN IN THE TWO LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS |
| APPROVED ON NOVEMBER 20, 2008. |
| |
| B. THE SABAL PALMS TO SHADE THE MULCH PATH HAVE BEEN |
| ELIMINATED. 3/22/10 MEETING AGREEMENT - STAFF |
| RECOMMENDS THAT TREES OR PALMS BE INSTALLED ALONG THE |
| PATH TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR PATH USERS. THIS IS A |
| PREFERRED LOCATION FOR MITIGATION TREES. |
| |
| C. STAFF SUPPORTS THE SUBSTITUTION OF SHADE TREES AT |
| THE PLAY AREA. THESE MAY REQUIRE ROOT BARRIERS. |
| |
| D. THE SABAL PALMS IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE |
| WERE REMOVED WITH THE DUMPSTER. 3/22/10 MEETING |
| AGREEMENT - STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT TREES OR PALMS BE |
| INSTALLED IN THIS LOCATION. |
| |
| E. THE SABAL PALMS IN THE NORTHERN TERMINAL ISLAND OF |
| THE CLUB HOUSE HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND SHALL BE SHOWN ON |
| THE PLANS AND INSTALLED TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| F. THE PROPOSED PLANS DO NOT SHOW LANDSCAPE IN THE OPEN |
| AREA NORTH OF BUILDING #6. LANDSCAPE ADJACENT TO ANDROS |
| ILES WAS REQUIRED AS PART OF THE PROJECT APPROVAL. |
| THERE ARE SOME RELOCATED PALMS CURRENTLY LOCATED IN THE |
| GENERAL VICINITY THAT WERE INSTALLED ON A TEMPORARY |
| BASIS. 3/22/10 MEETING AGREEMENT - INSTEAD OF |
| RELOCATING THEM AGAIN, THEY SHOULD BE LEFT IN PLACE |
| WITH THE UNDER PLANTING SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS. |
| THE REVISED PLANS SHALL ACCURATELY SHOW THE EXISTING |
| CONDITIONS. NOTE: THE DEAD PALMS SHALL BE REMOVED AND |
| REPLACED MEETING CANOPY REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS |
| (CALCULATED BY DBH). |
| |
| G. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO ANDROS ILES HAS |
| BEEN CHANGED. STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE INSTALLATION |
| OF ADDITIONAL SABAL PALMS IN THE BUFFER AREA. STAFF IS |
| CONCERNED THAT THE RELOCATED FICUS RUBIGINOSA (RUSTY |
| FIG) TREE WILL GROW LARGE AND WILL SQUEEZE OUT THE |
| OTHER TREES AND PALMS IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 3/22/10 |
| MEETING AGREEMENT - IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE |
| DEVELOPER AND LATER THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO |
| REPLACE THE CANOPY VALUE OF ANY TREES AND PALMS WHICH |
| DIE. |
| |
| H. THE TREES AND PALMS IN THE OPEN AREA NORTH OF |
| BUILDING #5 WERE MOVED INTO THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. |
| 3/22/10 MEETING AGREEMENT - STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT TREES |
| OR PALMS BE INSTALLED IN THIS LOCATION TO PROVIDE |
| ADDITIONAL SCREENING FOR ANDROS ISLE. |
| |
| I. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO OKEECHOBEE |
| BOULEVARD HAS BEEN CHANGED. STAFF AGREES WITH MOVING |
| THE TREES BACK TO AVOID THE FPL LINES. THE PROPOSED |
| LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOWS RELOCATED PALM TREES IN THE THREE |
| EASEMENTS WHICH CROSS THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. PLEASE |
| PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THIS IS ACCEPTABLE TO THE |
| PUBLIC UTILITIES AND THE CITY AS THE PLAT DEDICATES |
| THESE AREAS AS UTILITY EASEMENTS. NOTE: THE FPL LETTER, |
| DATED JULY 24, 2009, ADDRESSES THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE |
| PALM TREES TO THE EXISTING OVERHEAD LINES AND NOT THE |
| PLACEMENT OF THE PALMS WITHIN THE EASEMENTS. |
| |
| J. THE SABAL PALMS IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE |
| WERE REMOVED WITH THE DUMPSTER. 3/22/10 MEETING |
| AGREEMENT - STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT TREES OR PALMS BE |
| INSTALLED IN THIS LOCATION. |
| |
| K. THE RELOCATED SABAL PALMS ARE BEING REPLACED BY |
| SIGNIFICANTLY FEWER GROUPS OF NEW SABAL PALMS BETWEEN |
| THE BUILDINGS. 3/22/10 MEETING AGREEMENT - STAFF DOES |
| NOT OBJECT TO THIS CHANGE PROVIDED THAT THE OVERALL |
| TREE CANOPY REMAINS. |
| |
| L. THE ENTRY DRIVE LANDSCAPE HAS CHANGES, INCLUDING THE |
| RELOCATION OF FIG TREES, WHICH WERE NOT SHOWN ON THE |
| ORIGINAL PLANT INVENTORY, AND THE USE OF NEW NOT |
| RELOCATED SABAL PALMS AND OAKS. 3/22/10 MEETING |
| AGREEMENT - STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THIS CHANGE |
| PROVIDED THAT THE OVERALL TREE CANOPY REMAINS AND THE |
| REVISED PLANS REFLECT ACCURATE CONDITIONS. |
| |
| M. THE PROPOSED PLANS NO LONGER SHOW SABAL PALMS NORTH |
| OF THE LIFT STATION. 3/22/10 MEETING AGREEMENT - THE |
| REVISED PLANS SHALL ACCURATELY SHOW THE VEGETATION |
| AROUND THE LIFT STATION. NOTE: ANY EXOTICS TO BE |
| REMOVED AND ANY TREES WHICH MEET MINIMUM CITY STANDARDS |
| MAY BE COUNTED TOWARD MEETING THE CANOPY PRESERVATION |
| REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| N. THE PROPOSED PLANS SHOW 54 RELOCATED SABAL PALMS IN |
| THE OAK PRESERVE AREA ON THE OAKTON COMMONS COMMERCIAL |
| PARCEL. STAFF IS CONCERNED THAT THE PLANTING IS TOO |
| DENSE AND WILL NOT FOSTER LONG TERM SUSTAINABILITY OF |
| EITHER THE OAK TREES OR THE SABAL PALMS. 3/22/10 |
| MEETING AGREEMENT - PROVIDE A LETTER FROM OAKTON |
| COMMONS COMMERCIAL APPROVING THE RELOCATION TO THIS |
| LOCATION AND THAT OAKTON COMMONS COMMERCIAL IS |
| RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE TREES AND PALMS, INCLUDING |
| THE CANOPY REPLACEMENT VALUE OF ANY TREES OR PALMS |
| WHICH DIE. NOTE: ANY DEAD TREES OR PALMS SHALL BE |
| REMOVED AND REPLACED MEETING CANOPY REPLACEMENT |
| REQUIREMENTS (CALCULATED BY DBH). |
| |
| O. THE 13 RELOCATED SABAL PALMS ALONG THE EASTERN EDGE |
| OF THE BANK PARCEL ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE CORRECT |
| LOCATION. THEY SHALL BE SHOWN IN THEIR TRUE LOCATION. |
| |
| P. ALL OAKS SHALL BE CORRECTLY LABELED AS EITHER LAUREL |
| OR LIVE SPECIES. |
| |
| 3) MANY OF THE RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS WERE PLANTED |
| WITH THE ROOT BALL BELOW THE SURROUNDING GRADE. STAFF |
| IS CONCERNED THAT THE PLANTING DEPTH DOES NOT FOSTER |
| LONG TERM SUSTAINABILITY OF THE TREES AND PALMS. |
| 3/22/10 MEETING AGREEMENT - IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF |
| THE DEVELOPER AND LATER THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO |
| REPLACE THE CANOPY VALUE OF ANY TREES AND PALMS WHICH |
| DIE. |
| |
| 4) THE RELOCATED TREES NEED TO BE TRIMMED UNDER THE |
| SUPERVISION OF A CERTIFIED ARBORIST (OBSERVED DURING |
| SITE VISIT). |
| |
| 5) THE EXISTING TREES ALONG THE WEST AND NORTH SIDES OF |
| THE LAKE SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS AS THEY ARE PART |
| OF OAKTON PRESERVE. ANY DEAD TREES SHALL BE REPLACED. |
| THE WORK ON THE LAKE BANK HAS ALTERED THE RELATIONSHIP |
| OF THE BASES OF THE TREES TO THE SURROUNDING GRADE. ANY |
| NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE MADE TO ENSURE LONG TERM |
| SUSTAINABILITY. |
| |
| 6) ANY TREES SHOWN AS EXISTING OR PROPOSED ON THE PLANS |
| THAT HAVE DIED SHALL BE REPLACED AT AN EQUAL CANOPY |
| VALUE (CALCULATED BY DBH). |
| |
| 7) A REVISED TREE ALTERATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED |
| CORRECTLY REFLECTING ALL CHANGES. |
| |
| 8) THE NEWLY INSTALLED FENCING ALONG THE ANDROS ISLE |
| PROPERTY BOUNDARY REQUIRES A PERMIT. |
| |
| 9) THE ENTRYWAY BETWEEN UNITS 57 AND 58 WERE NOT |
| CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING THE APPROVED SITE PLANS, |
| LANDSCAPE PLANS AND SURVEYS (BOTH IN ZONING AND |
| BUILDING PERMIT). THE DIFFERENCES ARE NOT REFLECTED ON |
| THIS SET OF SUBMITTED PLANS. 3/22/10 MEETING AGREEMENT |
| - ZONING WILL ACCEPT A PLAN FOR EITHER OR BOTH OPTIONS |
| AS PART OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT, BUT THE BUILDING PERMIT |
| PLANS NEED TO BE ACCURATE WITH WHAT IS INSTALLED AT |
| TIME OF INSPECTION. |
| |
| 10) THE TRANSFORMER BETWEEN LOTS 55 AND 56 IS NOT SHOWN |
| ON THE APPROVED SITE PLANS, LANDSCAPE PLANS AND SURVEYS |
| (BOTH IN ZONING AND BUILDING PERMIT). THERE APPEAR TO |
| BE A NUMBER OF PADS BEING POURED FOR FUTURE |
| TRANSFORMERS. 3/22/10 MEETING AGREEMENT - ZONING WILL |
| ACCEPT SHEET RLP-11 AS THE MASTER GUIDE, BUT ALL |
| BUILDING PERMIT PLANS NEED TO ACCURATELY SHOW THE |
| CONDITIONS THAT ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO THE |
| INSPECTION. |
| |
| CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
| |