| Plan Review Notes For Permit 09060212 |
| Permit Number |
09060212 |
|
| Review Stop |
B |
| Sequence Number |
2 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2009-06-12 10:18:51 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF, BUILDING REVIEW 2ND | | | CHECKLIST. | | | REVIEW UNDER 2007 FL. RESIDENTIAL CODE W/ 2009 | | | REVISIONS. | | | | | | 1- CLEARLY MARK ON FLAT ROOF NOA 07-0730.03 SUBMITTED | | | WHICH BASE SHEET FASTENING OPTION IS GOING TO BE | | | INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH DESIGN PRESSURES OF | | | SEC. R301. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOA SUBMITTED DOESN'T | | | IDENTIFY FASTENING OPTION). | | | | | | 2- PROVIDE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR NAIL ENHANCING AT | | | PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS AS REQUIRED BY GENERAL | | | LIMITATION #7. (REPEAT COMMENT. CALCULATIONS WERE NOT | | | SUBMITTED). | | | | | | ***NOTE: I EXPLAINED TO MARK ON 6/10/09 THAT RAS 117 | | | CALCULATIONS ARE ALWAYS REQUIRED. ONLY WHEN NOA | | | REQUIRES RAS 117 CALCULATIONS TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED, | | | THEN THEY NEED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED. OTHERWISE, | | | CALCULATIONS OR PRESCRIPTIVE METHOD ON CONTRACTOR'S | | | LETTERHEAD ARE ACCEPTABLE. I DIDN'T TELL MARK THAT HE | | | HAS TO USE A TAMKO PRODUCT APPROVAL AS COMMENTED ON THE | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. CONTRACTOR IS FREE TO SELECT ANY | | | PRODUCT HE/SHE WANTS TO USE. WE DON'T REQUEST ANY | | | SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL. WE ONLY ENFORCE WHAT THE | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRES. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712. |
|
