Date |
Text |
2009-10-01 16:58:35 | FAILED |
| |
| NOTE: THE PLANS SHOW WORK ON 3 PARCELS - BANK, |
| COMMERCIAL AND ENTRY ROAD - EACH HAVING A DISTINCT PCN. |
| PER ROBERT BROWN, ASSISTANT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES |
| DIRECTOR, A SEPARATE BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR |
| THE WORK ON EACH PARCEL. ZONING WILL NOT APPROVE THE |
| PERMITS FOR THE BANK BUILDING AND BANK PARCEL SITE WORK |
| UNTIL THE PERMITS FOR THE SITE WORK AND LANDSCAPE ON |
| THE ENTRY ROAD TRACT AND THE COMMERCIAL TRACT ARE |
| SUBMITTED. |
| |
| 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE PROOF THAT THE FOLLOWING |
| CONDITIONS FROM ORDINANCE NO. 4162-08 HAVE BEEN MET: |
| |
| A. THE DEVELOPER SHALL INSTALL A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE |
| INTERSECTION OF OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND BENOIST FARMS |
| ROAD, UPON MEETING THE WARRANTS IDENTIFIED IN THE |
| LATEST EDITION OF THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL |
| DEVICES (MUTCD). THE TRAFFIC DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED |
| DURING PEAK SEASON OR ADJUSTED TO PEAK SEASON |
| CONDITIONS BASED ON PALM BEACH COUNTY CRITERIA FOR TWO |
| (2) CONSECUTIVE YEARS AFTER THE FINAL CERTIFICATE OF |
| OCCUPANCY FOR THE OAKTON COMMONS CPD IS ISSUED. PRIOR |
| TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE |
| FIRST COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITHIN THE OAKTON COMMONS CPD |
| FOLLOWING THE ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE, THE DEVELOPER |
| SHALL PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM THE PALM BEACH |
| COUNTY ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THAT ANY |
| REQUIRED BOND HAS BEEN POSTED AND A PUBLIC FACILITIES |
| AGREEMENT HAS BEEN EXECUTED WITH THE COUNTY. IF A BOND |
| AND/OR PUBLIC FACILITIES AGREEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED, |
| THEN IT SHALL BE STATED IN THE WRITTEN VERIFICATION |
| FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY. |
| |
| B. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY |
| FOR ANY NEW BUILDING(S) WITHIN THE OAKTON COMMONS CPD, |
| THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING EXCLUSIVE |
| TURN LANES AT THE PROJECT ACCESS DRIVEWAYS, WHERE NOT |
| EXISTING, WHICH SERVICE THE NEW BUILDING(S) FROM THE |
| REQUIRED TURN LANE(S): |
| |
| 1. EXCLUSIVE WEST BOUND RIGHT-TURN LANE ALONG |
| OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD, ONTO THE PROJECT ACCESS AT THE |
| INTERSECTION OF BENOIST FARMS ROAD. |
| 2. EXCLUSIVE EAST BOUND LEFT-TURN LANE ALONG OKEECHOBEE |
| BOULEVARD, ONTO THE PROJECT ACCESS AT THE INTERSECTION |
| OF BENOIST FARMS ROAD. |
| 3. WEST BOUND RIGHT-TURN LANE ALONG OKEECHOBEE |
| BOULEVARD, ONTO THE WESTERN PROJECT ACCESS LOCATION. |
| 4. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING PROVISIONS, IF |
| CONSTRUCTION OF THE TURN LANE(S) IS INCLUDED IN THE |
| FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION/PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| CONTRACT TO WIDEN OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD, THE CITY SHALL |
| NOT DELAY THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY |
| SOLELY BECAUSE THE FDOT/COUNTY ROAD CONTRACTOR HAS NOT |
| COMPLETED INSTALLATION OF THE TURN LANE(S) PRIOR TO THE |
| DEVELOPER'S REQUEST FOR THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. |
| |
| C. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE THE CITY'S PLANNING AND |
| ZONING DEPARTMENT DOCUMENTATION FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| OR THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION THAT THE |
| EXCLUSIVE TURN LANE(S) HAS BEEN BUILT TO THE APPLICABLE |
| STANDARDS OR EVIDENCE THAT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE TURN |
| LANE(S) IS INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT TO WIDEN OKEECHOBEE |
| BOULEVARD AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED BY FDOT/COUNTY'S |
| CONTRACTOR. |
| |
| D. PROOF PROVIDED |
| |
| E. PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT |
| FOR THE COMMERCIAL POD, THE DEVELOPER SHALL RECORD AN |
| EASEMENT TO ALLOW FOR JOINT USE OF THE COMMERCIAL |
| PARKING FOR PARK AND RIDE PURPOSES. THE EASEMENT |
| LANGUAGE SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING |
| AND ZONING DEPARTMENT AND THE OFFICE OF THE CITY |
| ATTORNEY PRIOR TO RECORDATION. |
| |
| 2) PROVIDE PROOF THAT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS FROM THE |
| APRIL 23, 2009, BANK MINOR AMENDMENT APPROVAL LETTER |
| HAVE BEEN MET: |
| |
| A. CONDITION MET |
| |
| B. THE EAST SIDE OF THE ENTRY ROAD WITHIN TRACT A SHALL |
| BE PLANTED WITH MATERIAL CONSISTENT WITH THE LANDSCAPE |
| PROPOSED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE ENTRY ROAD. THE |
| SPECIFIC MATERIAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND |
| ZONING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND REFLECTED |
| ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE RESPONSE |
| PROVIDED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL IS INADEQUATE. THERE ARE |
| AREAS IN THE ENTRY ROAD TRACT THAT CAN SUPPORT |
| LANDSCAPE AND WOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH THE HEDGE AND |
| SOD PLANTED ON THE FIRE STATION SITE. THESE SHALL BE |
| PLANTED AS OUTLINED IN THE LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| |
| 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THERE ARE A NUMBER OF DISCREPANCIES |
| AMONG THE LATEST PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND |
| ZONING DEPARTMENT AND THE SITE, LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL |
| PLANS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE PERMIT. ADDITIONALLY, |
| THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES AMONG THE PLANS SUBMITTED AS |
| PART OF THE PERMIT. ALL PLANS SHALL BE INTERNALLY |
| CONSISTENT AS WELL AS BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANS |
| APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. SAMPLE |
| OF INCONSISTENCIES IDENTIFIED BELOW: |
| |
| A. CORRECTED |
| |
| B. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS DIFFERENT LANDSCAPE AROUND |
| THE BUILDING AND THE SIGN THAN WHAT WAS APPROVED BY |
| PLANNING AND ZONING. ADDITIONALLY, THERE ARE CHANGES ON |
| THE EAST, NORTH AND WEST SIDES OF THE SITE AND DUE TO |
| THE RELOCATED WATER MAIN. THESE CHANGES REQUIRE THE |
| APPROVAL OF A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. |
| |
| C. CORRECTED |
| |
| D. CORRECTED |
| |
| E. THE PARKING DETAIL ON SHEET 6 OF 7 DOES NOT MATCH |
| THE SIZE OF THE PARKING SPACES ON THE SITE PLAN |
| (10'X20' VS 9'X18'). THIS DETAIL NOW CONFLICTS WITH THE |
| DETAIL ON SHEET SP.1. PLEASE NOTE THAT NEITHER DETAIL |
| SHOWS THE CONDITION WITH THE WHEEL STOPS. THE WHEEL |
| STOPS SHALL BE LOCATED TWO (2) FEET FROM THE END OF THE |
| SPACE. THE HC LOGO SHALL BE LOCATED TWO (2) FEET FROM |
| THE OPEN END OF THE PARKING SPACE. THERE SHALL BE 12 |
| INCHES DIMENSIONED ON THE INSIDE OF THE DOUBLE |
| STRIPPING (HARD TO DISTINGUISH THAT THE 16 INCHES SHOWN |
| ON PLANS IS TO THE CENTER LINE OF EACH DOUBLE STRIP). |
| |
| F. CORRECTED |
| |
| 4) NOTE THAT CHANGES TO THE PLANS WILL REQUIRE A NEW |
| MINOR AMENDMENT APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING |
| DEPARTMENT. |
| |
| 5) ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED |
| |
| 6) CORRECTED |
| |
| 7) CORRECTED |
| |
| 8) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL SHOW THE TREES THAT WILL BE |
| RELOCATED INTO THE 50 FOOT NATURAL AREA BUFFER ADJACENT |
| TO RIVERWALK. THE SITE WAS CLEARED DUE TO EXCESSIVE |
| EXOTICS AND THUS NOW IS NO LONGER IN A NATURAL BUFFER |
| STATE. |
| |
| 9) CORRECTED PLEASE NOTE THAT AN IRRIGATION PERMIT IS |
| REQUIRED. |
| |
| 10) REPEAT COMMENT: CORRECTLY SHOW THE TRANSITION |
| BETWEEN THE PARKING AND THE PRESERVE AREA ON THE SITE |
| AND LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE LIMITS OF WORK. THERE SEEM |
| TO BE CONTRADICTIONS WITH THE DETAIL AND THE LIMITS OF |
| WORK (PHASE LINE). THE CIVIL PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLANS |
| MAKE NO REFERENCE TO A "D" CURB BEING INSTALLED. IT IS |
| ONLY SHOWN ON THE DETAIL. THIS HAS THE POTENTIAL OF THE |
| "D" CURB NOT BEING INSTALLED IN THE FIELD BY THE |
| CONTRACTOR. ADDITIONALLY, WHILE THE DETAILS ON THE |
| CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW THE CURB, SOD AND SLOPE |
| THAT WILL SEPARATE THE NORTHERN DRIVE AISLE FROM THE |
| PRESERVE AREA, THIS IS SHOWN ON PHASE II AND THUS |
| CREATES CONFUSION IF WILL BE INSTALLED AS PART OF THE |
| PHASE I WORK. THIS NEEDS TO BE CLEARLY STATED AND SHOWN |
| ON THE PLANS. |
| |
| 11) ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED |
| |
| 12) REPEAT COMMENT: CALL OUT THE CURBS AS "D" CURBS ON |
| THE CIVIL PLANS. SEE COMMENT 10 ABOVE. |
| |
| 13) CORRECTED |
| |
| 14) PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO THE |
| FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE BANK: |
| |
| A. THE REQUIRED PARK AND RIDE SIGNAGE SHALL BE |
| INSTALLED. NOTE: THESE SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SIGN |
| PERMIT. |
| |
| B. EASEMENTS SHALL BE GRANTED TO THE CITY FOR THE WATER |
| METERS WITHIN THE PARCEL BOUNDARIES. |
| |
| C. TWO (2) COPIES OF THE FINAL REVISED ARCHITECTURAL |
| PLANS, REFLECTING THE FOOTPRINT CHANGE APPROVED ABOVE, |
| SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT |
| PRIOR TO THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE BANK |
| BUILDING. |
| |
| 15) ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED |
| |
| 16) NEW COMMENT: NO DETAILS WERE PROVIDED FOR THE NEW |
| RETAINING WALL SURROUNDING THE LANDSCAPE AREA AT THE |
| TERMINUS OF THE ENTRY DRIVE. |
| |
| 17) NEW COMMENT: TWO LIGHT POST LOCATIONS ALONG THE |
| PARKING NORTH OF THE FIRE STATION CONFLICT WITH TREE |
| LOCATIONS. |
| |
| 18) NEW COMMENT: THE CHANGE TO THE HC PARKING SPACE |
| LAYOUT AT THE FRONT ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING REQUIRES |
| THE APPROVAL OF A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. |
| |
| 19) NEW COMMENT: PLEASE NOTE THAT THE NEW GENERATOR |
| WILL REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT. ADDITIONALLY, THE |
| GENERATOR AND THE MOUNT MAY NOT EXCEED THE HEIGHT OF |
| THE MANSARD ROOF. DETAILS AND CROSS-SECTIONS NEED TO BE |
| PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF THE GENERATOR PERMIT. |
| |
| 20) NEW COMMENT: PROVIDE DETAILS AS TO THE HEIGHT OF |
| THE CONDENSING UNITS AND STANDS FROM THE ROOF AND |
| PROVIDE A CROSS-SECTION TO VERIFY THAT THE OVERALL |
| HEIGHT DOES NOT EXCEED THE HEIGHT OF THE MANSARD ROOF. |
| |
| |