Date |
Text |
2009-05-15 16:37:23 | I CALLED & TALKED TO THE CONTRACTOR, JEFF FISHER. FROM |
| MY UNDERSTANDING, HE STATED THAT SUITE # 101 WAS BEING |
| CONVERTED TO # 125, WHEREAS # 103 WOULD BE KNOWN AS # |
| 150. UNDER SECTION 1.3 OF THE CITY'S ADDRESSING POLICY |
| STATING, "IT WILL BE THE DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO |
| ASSIGN UNIT (DESIGNATORS) ADDRESSES TO ALL UNITS INSIDE |
| THE STRUCTURE. THE LIST OF ADDRESSES MUST BE APPROVED |
| BY THE MIS SUPPORT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. THE UNIT |
| DESIGNATORS SHALL BE NUMERIC & NOT INCLUDE ALPHA |
| CHARACTERS." SINCE THE PROPOSED CHANGES FROM # 101 TO |
| #125 & # 103 TO #150 DO NOT VIOLATE OUR ADDRESSING |
| POLICY, THE DEVELOPER CAN PROCEED WITH MAKING THE |
| CHANGES AT HIS/HER DISCRETION. HOWEVER, IT WILL BE |
| HIS/HER RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY USPS & THEIR BILLING |
| COMPANIES OF THE CHANGING SUITE ADDRESSES. UNDER PCN# |
| 74434329160010091, I HAVE ADJUSTED SEQUENTIAL UNIT |
| RECORD 0003 FROM 2400 CENTREPARK WEST DR # 101 TO # |
| 125, WHEREAS THERE WAS ALREADY AN EXISTING SEQUENTIAL |
| UNIT RECORD 0004 FOR 2400 CENTREPARK WEST DR # 150. I |
| ALSO CALLED & LEFT A MESSAGE FOR THE ARCHITECT, ALLEN |
| BIRSE TO CALL ME BACK AT HIS CONVENIENCE, AS THE SITE |
| PLANS STILL LIST SUITES # 101 & # 103, AND MAY NEED TO |
| BE ADJUSTED TO # 125 & # 150. I HAVE RETURNED THE |
| FOLDER OF DOCUMENTS BACK TO THE C21 BOX. |