| Date |
Text |
| 2009-02-09 17:11:08 | EXTERIOR STAIRWAY BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST. |
| | REVIEW UNDER FBC 2004 WITH 2007 REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 1- CLARIFY WHICH BUILDING IS THE CONSTRUCTION TAKEN |
| | PLACE. PERMIT APPLICATION AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS CALL |
| | FOR 1017 N. OLIVE AVE, WHILE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT |
| | CALLS FOR 1021 N. OLIVE AVE. ALSO, ACCORDING TO |
| | PROPERTY APPRAISAL WEBSITE PARCEL ID # SHOWN ON PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION CORRESPONDS TO 1021 N. OLIVE AVE. (REPEAT |
| | COMMENT). |
| | COORDINATE ALL INFORMATION AS REQUIRED, INCLUDING THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS TO HAVE CORRECT ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WITH CORRECT ADDRESS |
| | AND PARCEL ID NUMBER. (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1 ABOVE. |
| | *** NOTE: NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT NEEDS TO BE |
| | RE-RECORDED ALSO. IT EXPIRES AFTER 90 DAYS IF WORK IS |
| | NOT STARTED. IT WAS RECORDED ON 10/20/08. |
| | CORRECT NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY BE RECORDED AT TIME |
| | OF PERMIT PICK UP TO AVOID EXPIRATION OF IT. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE COMPLETE STAIRWAY FRAMING DETAILS AND |
| | SECTIONS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE 1607.1 FBC |
| | 2004 AND SEC. 1609.1 FBC 2004 (NOTE: SPECIFY ALL LOADS |
| | TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION FOR THE DESIGN). SHOW LOCATION |
| | OF STEEL COLUMNS AND WOOD COLUMNS. PROVIDE ANCHORING OF |
| | STAIRS AT BOTTOM (WRONG CONNECTOR. SEE ITEM #13 BELOW). |
| | SPECIFY STRINGERS AND CONNECTIONS (TOP & BOTTOM AT EACH |
| | LANDING). CLARIFY DETAIL CONNECTION AT TOP OF WOOD |
| | COLUMN (COORDINATE WITH DETAIL 3/SP). SPECIFY MATERIALS |
| | (TYPE OF WOOD AND GRADE) USED TO BUILD STAIRS. (REPEAT |
| | COMMENT). DETAILS PROVIDED ON SHEET A1 DON'T CORRESPOND |
| | TO FLOOR PLANS SHOWN ON SHEET SP. DESIGN LOADS FROM |
| | TABLE 1607.1 ARE NOT SPECIFIED. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE GUARDRAIL AND HANDRAIL DETAILS/SECTIONS TO |
| | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH STRUCTURAL DESIGN TABLE 1607.1 AND |
| | SEC. 11-4.26.3 OF FBC 2004. (REPEAT COMMENT). DESIGN |
| | SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT PROVIDED. AND, DETAILS DON'T |
| | SHOW HOW ARE THE PICKETS ATTACHED TO THE GUARDRAIL. |
| | ALSO, THERE ARE NOT DETAILS SHOWING ATTACHMENT OF |
| | HANDRAILS TO GUARDRAILS. SHOW HANDRAIL ON DETAIL 3/A1. |
| | ALSO, COORDINATE DETAIL 3/A1 WITH DETAIL A/SP (SEE BEAM |
| | CONNECTION). |
| | |
| | 5- HANDRAILS NEED TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 11-4.9.4(2) AND |
| | FIGURE 19 OF CHAPTER 11 FBC 2004. |
| | ***NOTE: CHECK TOP AND BOTTOM HANDRAIL ENDING. (REPEAT |
| | COMMENT). HANDRAIL DOENS'T COMPLY AT TOP AND BOTTOM. |
| | ALSO, FLOOR PLANS ON SHEET SP DON'T SHOW THE HANDRAIL |
| | EXTENSIONS AT TOP AND BOTTOM. |
| | |
| | 6- TYPICAL STAIR DETAILS ON SHEET A1 DON'T APPLY TO |
| | THIS PROJECT. THEY ARE FOR STAIRS ATTACHED TO A WALL. |
| | SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. ALSO, REVISE SIZE OF |
| | HANDRAIL TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 11-4.26.2 FBC 2004. |
| | (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE DETAILS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | GUARDRAIL OPENINGS LIMITATIONS, SEC 1012.3 FBC 2004. |
| | (REPEAT COMMENT). OPENING NOT TO ALLOW 4" SPHERE TO |
| | PASS THRU. NO 4" MAXIMUM. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 8- PROVIDE PLANS SHOWING EXISTING STAIRS AND LANDINGS |
| | TO BE REMOVED. ACCORDING TO PICTURE PROVIDED IT LOOKS |
| | LIKE THE SWING OF THE DOOR IS GOING TO INTERFERE WITH |
| | THE EGRESS SINCE PROPOSED STAIRS ARE ORIENTED ON THE |
| | OTHER WAY SO THE SWING OF THE DOOR WILL BE IN THE |
| | EGRESS DIRECTION. CLARIFY HOW DEALING WITH THIS ISSUE. |
| | IF NEW DOOR WILL BE INSTALLED, THEN ADD TO THE SCOPE OF |
| | WORK AND PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE DOOR. |
| | |
| | 9- OWES $80.80 FOR UPDATED VALUATION. |
| | |
| | 10- SPECIFY TYPE OF ALTERATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. (REPEAT |
| | COMMENT). THIS IS NOT LEVEL 1. REVIEW SEC. 301.5 AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. CHANGING CONFIGURATION OF STAIRS. |
| | |
| | 11- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED |
| | BY DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS |
| | SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER |
| | PAGE AND PAGE WHERE CONNECTOR IS SHOWN. NO NEED TO |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE REPORT. (REPEAT COMMENT). MISSING |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR CONNECTOR #4 SIMPSON TA10 SHOWN ON |
| | CONNECTOR SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | 12- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | (REPEAT COMMENT). INFORMATION SUBMITTED SAYS "REVIEWED |
| | AND APPROVED" AND THEN THE DATE. BUT IT DOESN'T |
| | IDENTIFY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD WHO REVIEWED IT. |
| | ANYBODY CAN WRITE "REVIEWED AND APPROVED". CLARIFY |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY WHOM?. THE NAME OF THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD IS NOT SHOWN. USE STANDARD SHOP |
| | DRAWINGS STAMP WITH COMPANY'S NAME OR WRITE IT DOWN ON. |
| | AND, SIGN IT RESPECTIVELY. |
| | |
| | 13- DETAIL A/A1: CONNECTOR "TA10" SPECIFIED AT THE |
| | BOTTOM OF STAIRS DOESN'T WORK. THIS IS A CONNECTOR |
| | DESIGNED TO SUPPORT THE STAIR TREADS NOT THE WHOLE |
| | STAIR ASSEMBLY. SEE SIMPSON CATALOG AND REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 14- DETAIL 1/SP: CLARIFY WHAT'S THE DOUBLE LINE SHOWN |
| | IN THE MIDDLE OF STAIRS FROM INTERMEDIATE STAIR LANDING |
| | TO UPPER STAIR LANDING FOR?. SEE COMMENTS ON PLANS AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: ONE SET OF PLANS WILL BE RETAINED IN THIS |
| | OFFICE TO VERIFY CHANGES AT TIME OF RE-SUBMITTAL. |
| | ARCHITECT TO REVIEW ATTACHED COPY OF FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | SEC. 553.80(2)(B) REGARDING DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AND |
| | MULTIPLE REVIEWS. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
